Milk thistle and indinavir: a randomized controlled pharmacokinetics study and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether ingestion of milk thistle affects the pharmacokinetics of indinavir. METHODS: We conducted a three-period, randomized controlled trial with 16 healthy participants. We randomized participants to milk thistle or control. All participants received initial dosing of in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mills, E, Wilson, K, Clarke, M, Foster, B, Walker, S, Rachlis, B, DeGroot, N, Montori, V, Gold, W, Phillips, E, Myers, S, Gallicano, K
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2005
_version_ 1797106226460360704
author Mills, E
Wilson, K
Clarke, M
Foster, B
Walker, S
Rachlis, B
DeGroot, N
Montori, V
Gold, W
Phillips, E
Myers, S
Gallicano, K
author_facet Mills, E
Wilson, K
Clarke, M
Foster, B
Walker, S
Rachlis, B
DeGroot, N
Montori, V
Gold, W
Phillips, E
Myers, S
Gallicano, K
author_sort Mills, E
collection OXFORD
description OBJECTIVES: To determine whether ingestion of milk thistle affects the pharmacokinetics of indinavir. METHODS: We conducted a three-period, randomized controlled trial with 16 healthy participants. We randomized participants to milk thistle or control. All participants received initial dosing of indinavir, and baseline indinavir levels were obtained (AUC(0-8)) (phase I). The active group were then given 450 mg milk-thistle extract capsules to be taken t.i.d. from day 2 to day 30. The control group received no plant extract. On day 29 and day 30, indinavir dosing and sampling was repeated in both groups as before (phase II). After a wash-out period of 7 days, indinavir dosing and sampling were repeated as before (phase III). RESULTS: All participants completed the trial, but two were excluded from analysis due to protocol violation. There were no significant between-group differences. Active group mean AUC(0-8) indinavir decreased by 4.4% (90% CI, -27.5% to -26%, P=0.78) from phase I to phase II in the active group, and by 17.3% (90% CI, -37.3% to +9%, P=0.25) in phase III. Control group mean AUC(0-8) decreased by 21.5% (90% CI, -43% to +8%, P=0.2) from phase I to phase II and by 38.5% (90% CI, -55.3% to -15.3%, P=0.01) of baseline at phase III. To place our findings in context, milk thistle-indinavir trials were identified through systematic searches of the literature. A meta-analysis of three milk thistle-indinavir trials revealed a non-significant pooled mean difference of 1% in AUC(0-8) (95% CI, -53% to 55%, P=0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Indinavir levels were not reduced significantly in the presence of milk thistle.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:58:41Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ff024396-418b-4cf3-9c9e-1e6ff8ee112e
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:58:41Z
publishDate 2005
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ff024396-418b-4cf3-9c9e-1e6ff8ee112e2022-03-27T13:41:09ZMilk thistle and indinavir: a randomized controlled pharmacokinetics study and meta-analysis.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ff024396-418b-4cf3-9c9e-1e6ff8ee112eEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2005Mills, EWilson, KClarke, MFoster, BWalker, SRachlis, BDeGroot, NMontori, VGold, WPhillips, EMyers, SGallicano, K OBJECTIVES: To determine whether ingestion of milk thistle affects the pharmacokinetics of indinavir. METHODS: We conducted a three-period, randomized controlled trial with 16 healthy participants. We randomized participants to milk thistle or control. All participants received initial dosing of indinavir, and baseline indinavir levels were obtained (AUC(0-8)) (phase I). The active group were then given 450 mg milk-thistle extract capsules to be taken t.i.d. from day 2 to day 30. The control group received no plant extract. On day 29 and day 30, indinavir dosing and sampling was repeated in both groups as before (phase II). After a wash-out period of 7 days, indinavir dosing and sampling were repeated as before (phase III). RESULTS: All participants completed the trial, but two were excluded from analysis due to protocol violation. There were no significant between-group differences. Active group mean AUC(0-8) indinavir decreased by 4.4% (90% CI, -27.5% to -26%, P=0.78) from phase I to phase II in the active group, and by 17.3% (90% CI, -37.3% to +9%, P=0.25) in phase III. Control group mean AUC(0-8) decreased by 21.5% (90% CI, -43% to +8%, P=0.2) from phase I to phase II and by 38.5% (90% CI, -55.3% to -15.3%, P=0.01) of baseline at phase III. To place our findings in context, milk thistle-indinavir trials were identified through systematic searches of the literature. A meta-analysis of three milk thistle-indinavir trials revealed a non-significant pooled mean difference of 1% in AUC(0-8) (95% CI, -53% to 55%, P=0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Indinavir levels were not reduced significantly in the presence of milk thistle.
spellingShingle Mills, E
Wilson, K
Clarke, M
Foster, B
Walker, S
Rachlis, B
DeGroot, N
Montori, V
Gold, W
Phillips, E
Myers, S
Gallicano, K
Milk thistle and indinavir: a randomized controlled pharmacokinetics study and meta-analysis.
title Milk thistle and indinavir: a randomized controlled pharmacokinetics study and meta-analysis.
title_full Milk thistle and indinavir: a randomized controlled pharmacokinetics study and meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Milk thistle and indinavir: a randomized controlled pharmacokinetics study and meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Milk thistle and indinavir: a randomized controlled pharmacokinetics study and meta-analysis.
title_short Milk thistle and indinavir: a randomized controlled pharmacokinetics study and meta-analysis.
title_sort milk thistle and indinavir a randomized controlled pharmacokinetics study and meta analysis
work_keys_str_mv AT millse milkthistleandindinavirarandomizedcontrolledpharmacokineticsstudyandmetaanalysis
AT wilsonk milkthistleandindinavirarandomizedcontrolledpharmacokineticsstudyandmetaanalysis
AT clarkem milkthistleandindinavirarandomizedcontrolledpharmacokineticsstudyandmetaanalysis
AT fosterb milkthistleandindinavirarandomizedcontrolledpharmacokineticsstudyandmetaanalysis
AT walkers milkthistleandindinavirarandomizedcontrolledpharmacokineticsstudyandmetaanalysis
AT rachlisb milkthistleandindinavirarandomizedcontrolledpharmacokineticsstudyandmetaanalysis
AT degrootn milkthistleandindinavirarandomizedcontrolledpharmacokineticsstudyandmetaanalysis
AT montoriv milkthistleandindinavirarandomizedcontrolledpharmacokineticsstudyandmetaanalysis
AT goldw milkthistleandindinavirarandomizedcontrolledpharmacokineticsstudyandmetaanalysis
AT phillipse milkthistleandindinavirarandomizedcontrolledpharmacokineticsstudyandmetaanalysis
AT myerss milkthistleandindinavirarandomizedcontrolledpharmacokineticsstudyandmetaanalysis
AT gallicanok milkthistleandindinavirarandomizedcontrolledpharmacokineticsstudyandmetaanalysis