Attributing the 2017 Bangladesh floods from meteorological and hydrological perspectives

<p>In August 2017 Bangladesh faced one of its worst river flooding events in recent history. This paper presents, for the first time, an attribution of this precipitation-induced flooding to anthropogenic climate change from a combined meteorological and hydrological perspective. Experiments w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philip, S, Sparrow, S, Kew, S, Van Der Weil, K, Wanders, N, Singh, R, Hassan, A, Mohammed, K, Javid, H, Haustein, K, Otto, F, Hirpa, F, Rimi, R, Islam, AKMS, Wallom, D, Van Olenborgh, GJ
Format: Journal article
Published: European Geosciences Union 2019
_version_ 1797106260010598400
author Philip, S
Sparrow, S
Kew, S
Van Der Weil, K
Wanders, N
Singh, R
Hassan, A
Mohammed, K
Javid, H
Haustein, K
Otto, F
Hirpa, F
Rimi, R
Islam, AKMS
Wallom, D
Van Olenborgh, GJ
author_facet Philip, S
Sparrow, S
Kew, S
Van Der Weil, K
Wanders, N
Singh, R
Hassan, A
Mohammed, K
Javid, H
Haustein, K
Otto, F
Hirpa, F
Rimi, R
Islam, AKMS
Wallom, D
Van Olenborgh, GJ
author_sort Philip, S
collection OXFORD
description <p>In August 2017 Bangladesh faced one of its worst river flooding events in recent history. This paper presents, for the first time, an attribution of this precipitation-induced flooding to anthropogenic climate change from a combined meteorological and hydrological perspective. Experiments were conducted with three observational datasets and two climate models to estimate changes in the extreme 10-day precipitation event frequency over the Brahmaputra basin up to the present and, additionally, an outlook to 2 ∘C warming since pre-industrial times. The precipitation fields were then used as meteorological input for four different hydrological models to estimate the corresponding changes in river discharge, allowing for comparison between approaches and for the robustness of the attribution results to be assessed.</p> <p>In all three observational precipitation datasets the climate change trends for extreme precipitation similar to that observed in August 2017 are not significant, however in two out of three series, the sign of this insignificant trend is positive. One climate model ensemble shows a significant positive influence of anthropogenic climate change, whereas the other large ensemble model simulates a cancellation between the increase due to greenhouse gases (GHGs) and a decrease due to sulfate aerosols. Considering discharge rather than precipitation, the hydrological models show that attribution of the change in discharge towards higher values is somewhat less uncertain than in precipitation, but the 95 % confidence intervals still encompass no change in risk. Extending the analysis to the future, all models project an increase in probability of extreme events at 2 ∘C global heating since pre-industrial times, becoming more than 1.7 times more likely for high 10-day precipitation and being more likely by a factor of about 1.5 for discharge. Our best estimate on the trend in flooding events similar to the Brahmaputra event of August 2017 is derived by synthesizing the observational and model results: we find the change in risk to be greater than 1 and of a similar order of magnitude (between 1 and 2) for both the meteorological and hydrological approach. This study shows that, for precipitation-induced flooding events, investigating changes in precipitation is useful, either as an alternative when hydrological models are not available or as an additional measure to confirm qualitative conclusions. Besides this, it highlights the importance of using multiple models in attribution studies, particularly where the climate change signal is not strong relative to natural variability or is confounded by other factors such as aerosols.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:59:11Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ff256ebb-e17b-4c75-b9ee-0ab8cb3ca00a
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:59:11Z
publishDate 2019
publisher European Geosciences Union
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ff256ebb-e17b-4c75-b9ee-0ab8cb3ca00a2022-03-27T13:42:34ZAttributing the 2017 Bangladesh floods from meteorological and hydrological perspectivesJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ff256ebb-e17b-4c75-b9ee-0ab8cb3ca00aSymplectic Elements at OxfordEuropean Geosciences Union2019Philip, SSparrow, SKew, SVan Der Weil, KWanders, NSingh, RHassan, AMohammed, KJavid, HHaustein, KOtto, FHirpa, FRimi, RIslam, AKMSWallom, DVan Olenborgh, GJ<p>In August 2017 Bangladesh faced one of its worst river flooding events in recent history. This paper presents, for the first time, an attribution of this precipitation-induced flooding to anthropogenic climate change from a combined meteorological and hydrological perspective. Experiments were conducted with three observational datasets and two climate models to estimate changes in the extreme 10-day precipitation event frequency over the Brahmaputra basin up to the present and, additionally, an outlook to 2 ∘C warming since pre-industrial times. The precipitation fields were then used as meteorological input for four different hydrological models to estimate the corresponding changes in river discharge, allowing for comparison between approaches and for the robustness of the attribution results to be assessed.</p> <p>In all three observational precipitation datasets the climate change trends for extreme precipitation similar to that observed in August 2017 are not significant, however in two out of three series, the sign of this insignificant trend is positive. One climate model ensemble shows a significant positive influence of anthropogenic climate change, whereas the other large ensemble model simulates a cancellation between the increase due to greenhouse gases (GHGs) and a decrease due to sulfate aerosols. Considering discharge rather than precipitation, the hydrological models show that attribution of the change in discharge towards higher values is somewhat less uncertain than in precipitation, but the 95 % confidence intervals still encompass no change in risk. Extending the analysis to the future, all models project an increase in probability of extreme events at 2 ∘C global heating since pre-industrial times, becoming more than 1.7 times more likely for high 10-day precipitation and being more likely by a factor of about 1.5 for discharge. Our best estimate on the trend in flooding events similar to the Brahmaputra event of August 2017 is derived by synthesizing the observational and model results: we find the change in risk to be greater than 1 and of a similar order of magnitude (between 1 and 2) for both the meteorological and hydrological approach. This study shows that, for precipitation-induced flooding events, investigating changes in precipitation is useful, either as an alternative when hydrological models are not available or as an additional measure to confirm qualitative conclusions. Besides this, it highlights the importance of using multiple models in attribution studies, particularly where the climate change signal is not strong relative to natural variability or is confounded by other factors such as aerosols.</p>
spellingShingle Philip, S
Sparrow, S
Kew, S
Van Der Weil, K
Wanders, N
Singh, R
Hassan, A
Mohammed, K
Javid, H
Haustein, K
Otto, F
Hirpa, F
Rimi, R
Islam, AKMS
Wallom, D
Van Olenborgh, GJ
Attributing the 2017 Bangladesh floods from meteorological and hydrological perspectives
title Attributing the 2017 Bangladesh floods from meteorological and hydrological perspectives
title_full Attributing the 2017 Bangladesh floods from meteorological and hydrological perspectives
title_fullStr Attributing the 2017 Bangladesh floods from meteorological and hydrological perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Attributing the 2017 Bangladesh floods from meteorological and hydrological perspectives
title_short Attributing the 2017 Bangladesh floods from meteorological and hydrological perspectives
title_sort attributing the 2017 bangladesh floods from meteorological and hydrological perspectives
work_keys_str_mv AT philips attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT sparrows attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT kews attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT vanderweilk attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT wandersn attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT singhr attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT hassana attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT mohammedk attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT javidh attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT hausteink attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT ottof attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT hirpaf attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT rimir attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT islamakms attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT wallomd attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives
AT vanolenborghgj attributingthe2017bangladeshfloodsfrommeteorologicalandhydrologicalperspectives