The Institutional Framing of Policy Debates: Economics vs. Environment

By framing the economics versus environment debate as a mixed-motive situation, opportunities become visible that allow greater benefits to all interests in the debate. Yet, social, cultural, and institutional arrangements frame how these interests see these opportunities, creating a barrier to mixe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ventresca, M, Hoffman, A
Format: Journal article
Published: 1999
_version_ 1797106308483121152
author Ventresca, M
Hoffman, A
author_facet Ventresca, M
Hoffman, A
author_sort Ventresca, M
collection OXFORD
description By framing the economics versus environment debate as a mixed-motive situation, opportunities become visible that allow greater benefits to all interests in the debate. Yet, social, cultural, and institutional arrangements frame how these interests see these opportunities, creating a barrier to mixed-motive analyses. In this article, the authors use an institutional perspective to analyze how the economics versus environment debate emerges from institutions as presently structured. They present an analysis of its present framing based on three aspects of institutions-regulative, normative, and cognitive-and consider the prescriptive implications they expose at the managerial and organizational level of action. The authors conclude with an analysis of possible solutions to overcome them.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T06:59:54Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ff6006f1-6e8d-4932-b34f-1e6703b99532
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T06:59:54Z
publishDate 1999
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ff6006f1-6e8d-4932-b34f-1e6703b995322022-03-27T13:44:28ZThe Institutional Framing of Policy Debates: Economics vs. EnvironmentJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ff6006f1-6e8d-4932-b34f-1e6703b99532Saïd Business School - Eureka1999Ventresca, MHoffman, ABy framing the economics versus environment debate as a mixed-motive situation, opportunities become visible that allow greater benefits to all interests in the debate. Yet, social, cultural, and institutional arrangements frame how these interests see these opportunities, creating a barrier to mixed-motive analyses. In this article, the authors use an institutional perspective to analyze how the economics versus environment debate emerges from institutions as presently structured. They present an analysis of its present framing based on three aspects of institutions-regulative, normative, and cognitive-and consider the prescriptive implications they expose at the managerial and organizational level of action. The authors conclude with an analysis of possible solutions to overcome them.
spellingShingle Ventresca, M
Hoffman, A
The Institutional Framing of Policy Debates: Economics vs. Environment
title The Institutional Framing of Policy Debates: Economics vs. Environment
title_full The Institutional Framing of Policy Debates: Economics vs. Environment
title_fullStr The Institutional Framing of Policy Debates: Economics vs. Environment
title_full_unstemmed The Institutional Framing of Policy Debates: Economics vs. Environment
title_short The Institutional Framing of Policy Debates: Economics vs. Environment
title_sort institutional framing of policy debates economics vs environment
work_keys_str_mv AT ventrescam theinstitutionalframingofpolicydebateseconomicsvsenvironment
AT hoffmana theinstitutionalframingofpolicydebateseconomicsvsenvironment
AT ventrescam institutionalframingofpolicydebateseconomicsvsenvironment
AT hoffmana institutionalframingofpolicydebateseconomicsvsenvironment