The hau of the paper and dividual authors: reimagining authorship in anthropology

<p>Despite repeated calls for change, social and cultural anthropology is still dominated by single authored works. I consider two thought experiments that might disturb the status quo in interesting ways. Anthropologists could publish anonymously, treating ourselves in the same way as we trea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Blisset, L
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024
_version_ 1811139985016881152
author Blisset, L
author_facet Blisset, L
author_sort Blisset, L
collection OXFORD
description <p>Despite repeated calls for change, social and cultural anthropology is still dominated by single authored works. I consider two thought experiments that might disturb the status quo in interesting ways. Anthropologists could publish anonymously, treating ourselves in the same way as we treat our anonymised informants, for example, using pseudonyms. Alternatively, we could treat our colleagues in the field not only as equals but also as co-authors. Both these options have implications concerning the ‘dividual’ author (perhaps now thought of as an ‘auth’), and involve rethinking the ‘hau’ of publication.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:27:02Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:ffda8fe4-0d28-4415-96a1-ec3737a34706
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:14:47Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:ffda8fe4-0d28-4415-96a1-ec3737a347062024-07-09T11:40:48ZThe hau of the paper and dividual authors: reimagining authorship in anthropologyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:ffda8fe4-0d28-4415-96a1-ec3737a34706EnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley2024Blisset, L<p>Despite repeated calls for change, social and cultural anthropology is still dominated by single authored works. I consider two thought experiments that might disturb the status quo in interesting ways. Anthropologists could publish anonymously, treating ourselves in the same way as we treat our anonymised informants, for example, using pseudonyms. Alternatively, we could treat our colleagues in the field not only as equals but also as co-authors. Both these options have implications concerning the ‘dividual’ author (perhaps now thought of as an ‘auth’), and involve rethinking the ‘hau’ of publication.</p>
spellingShingle Blisset, L
The hau of the paper and dividual authors: reimagining authorship in anthropology
title The hau of the paper and dividual authors: reimagining authorship in anthropology
title_full The hau of the paper and dividual authors: reimagining authorship in anthropology
title_fullStr The hau of the paper and dividual authors: reimagining authorship in anthropology
title_full_unstemmed The hau of the paper and dividual authors: reimagining authorship in anthropology
title_short The hau of the paper and dividual authors: reimagining authorship in anthropology
title_sort hau of the paper and dividual authors reimagining authorship in anthropology
work_keys_str_mv AT blissetl thehauofthepaperanddividualauthorsreimaginingauthorshipinanthropology
AT blissetl hauofthepaperanddividualauthorsreimaginingauthorshipinanthropology