Lying for Strategic Advantage: Rational and Boundedly Rational Misrepresentation of Intentions.
Starting from an example of the Allies’ decision to feint at Calais and attack Normandy on D-Day, this paper models misrepresentation of intentions to competitors or enemies. Allowing for the possibility of bounded strategic rationality and rational players’ responses to it yields a sensible account...
Autor principal: | Crawford, V |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado em: |
AEA
2003
|
Registos relacionados
-
Large losses from little lies: strategic gender misrepresentation and cooperation
Por: Drouvelis, Michalis, et al.
Publicado em: (2023) -
Large losses from little lies: Strategic gender misrepresentation and cooperation.
Por: Michalis Drouvelis, et al.
Publicado em: (2023-01-01) -
Does Economic Knowledge Create Advantage in Improving Bounded Rationality?
Por: Bora Süslü, et al.
Publicado em: (2020-06-01) -
Rational methods in lie algebras /
Por: Seligman, George B., 1927-
Publicado em: (1976) -
Level-k Auctions: Can Boundedly Rational Strategic Thinking Explain the Winner's Curse and Overbidding in Private-Value Auctions?
Por: Crawford, V, et al.
Publicado em: (2007)