Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal

Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of covid-19 infection: systematic review and critical appraisal

<p><strong>Objective:</strong> To review and critically appraise published and preprint reports of prediction models for diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) in patients with suspected infection, for prognosis of patients with covid-19, and for detecting people in the gen...

Descrizione completa

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Wynants, L, Van Calster, B, Bonten, MMJ, Collins, GS, Debray, TBA, De Vos, M, C Haller, M, Heinze, G, Moons, KGM, Riley, RD, Schuit, E, Smits, LJM, Snell, KIE, Steyerberg, EW, Wallisch, C, van Smeden, M
Natura:	Journal article
Lingua:	English
Pubblicazione:	BMJ 2020

Documenti analoghi

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data: TRIPOD-Cluster checklist
di: Debray, TPA, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models developed or validated using clustered data (TRIPOD-Cluster): explanation and elaboration
di: Debray, TPA, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Methodology over metrics: current scientific standards are a disservice to patients and society
di: Van Calster, B, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a binary outcome
di: Riley, RD, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model
di: Riley, RD, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020)

ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 3. The ROC plot: a picture that needs a 1000 words
di: Van Calster, B, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020)

There is no such thing as a validated prediction model
di: Ben Van Calster, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023-02-01)

Transparent reporting of multivariable prediction models for individual prognosis or diagnosis: checklist for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (TRIPOD-SRMA)
di: Snell, KIE, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 1): from development to external validation
di: Collins, GS, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction models
di: Verbakel, JY, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020)

Risk of bias assessments in individual participant data meta-analyses of test accuracy and prediction models: a review shows improvements are needed
di: Levis, B, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

COVID-19 prediction models should adhere to methodological and reporting standards
di: Collins, GS, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020)

Flaws in the development and validation of a covid-19 prediction model
di: Collins, GS, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020)

Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model using multinomial logistic regression
di: Pate, A, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

On the aggregation of published prognostic scores for causal inference in observational studies
di: Nguyen, T-L, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020)

Statistics versus machine learning: definitions are interesting (but understanding, methodology, and reporting are more important)
di: Van Calster, B, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2019)

Minimum sample size calculations for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a time-to-event outcome
di: Riley, RD, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

A note on estimating the Cox-Snell R2 from a reported C statistic (AUROC) to inform sample size calculations for developing a prediction model with a binary outcome
di: Riley, RD, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020)

External validation of clinical prediction models: simulation-based sample size calculations were more reliable than rules-of-thumb
di: Snell, KIE, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

Predictive analytics in health care: how can we know it works?
di: Van Calster, B, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2019)

Systematic review identifies the design and methodological conduct of studies on machine learning-based prediction models
di: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Reporting of prognostic clinical prediction models based on machine learning methods in oncology needs to be improved
di: Dhiman, P, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

TRIPOD statement: a preliminary pre-post analysis of reporting and methods of prediction models
di: Zamanipoor Najafabadi, AH, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020)

Consequences of relying on statistical significance: some illustrations
di: Van Calster, B, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2018)

Overinterpretation of findings in machine learning prediction model studies in oncology: a systematic review
di: Dhiman, P, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Risk of bias of prognostic models developed using machine learning: a systematic review in oncology
di: Dhiman, P, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review
di: Dhiman, P, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)

Protocol for development of a reporting guideline (TRIPOD-AI) and risk of bias tool (PROBAST-AI) for diagnostic and prognostic prediction model studies based on artificial intelligence
di: Collins, GS, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021)

Minimum sample size for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a continuous outcome
di: Archer, L, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020)

Three myths about risk thresholds for prediction models
di: Laure Wynants, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2019-10-01)

Penalization and shrinkage methods produced unreliable clinical prediction models especially when sample size was small
di: Riley, RD, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2020)

Adaptive sample size determination for the development of clinical prediction models
di: Evangelia Christodoulou, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2021-03-01)

PROBAST: A tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies
di: Wolff, RF, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2019)

TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods
di: Collins, GS, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

External validation of clinical prediction models using big datasets from e-health records or IPD meta-analysis: opportunities and challenges
di: Riley, R, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2016)

Poor handling of continuous predictors in clinical prediction models using logistic regression: a systematic review
di: Ma, J, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)

Artificial intelligence algorithms for medical prediction should be nonproprietary and readily available
di: Van Calster, B, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2019)

A framework for meta-analysis of prediction model studies with binary and time-to-event outcomes
di: Debray, T, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2018)

Evaluation of clinical prediction models (part 2): how to undertake an external validation study
di: Riley, RD, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Systematic review finds "spin" practices and poor reporting standards in studies on machine learning-based prediction models
di: Andaur Navarro, CL, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2023)