Interactional inhospitableness : a re-analysis of the mansplaining incident in Rebecca Solnit’s (2008) essay “Men Explain Things to Me”

The neologism “mansplaining” refers to a specific type of social behaviour in which “men [are] unnecessarily explaining things to women” (Bridges, 2021, p. 3). With the focus on “unnecessarily,” the verb “to mansplain” calls attention to cases of socio-pragmatic inappropriateness and more specifical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rycker, Teun De
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2022
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/21280/1/TE%2010.pdf
_version_ 1796933404414967808
author Rycker, Teun De
author_facet Rycker, Teun De
author_sort Rycker, Teun De
collection UKM
description The neologism “mansplaining” refers to a specific type of social behaviour in which “men [are] unnecessarily explaining things to women” (Bridges, 2021, p. 3). With the focus on “unnecessarily,” the verb “to mansplain” calls attention to cases of socio-pragmatic inappropriateness and more specifically to violations of the Gricean Maxim of Quantity. In addition, the creative use of the “man-” morpheme highlights the problematic gendered nature of the phenomenon. This article is an attempt to interpret mansplaining in terms of a notion of interactional inhospitableness. Using a broad-based socio-pragmatic, conversational, discourse-analytical, and praxeological perspective, it will explore the mansplaining interaction (henceforth, the incident) that was recounted and recontextualised in Solnit’s (2008) famous essay, “Men Explain Things to Me: Facts Didn’t Get in Their Way.” The main finding is that though manipulative turn-taking and exploitative epistemic authority played an important role, it was affective asymmetries that made Solnit’s (2008) mansplaining episode uniquely “noticeable.” At the party where the incident occurred, hospitableness and high-culture competition appeared as two defining but conflicting features. This conflict cast the three main participants – not only as reductively gendered interlocutors but – as a failed and failing host (referred to as “Mr. Very Important” in the essay) and two of his guests (Rebecca Solnit and Sallie). The wider relevance and application of a notion of interactional (in)hospitableness will be discussed.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T04:46:39Z
format Article
id ukm.eprints-21280
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T04:46:39Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
record_format dspace
spelling ukm.eprints-212802023-03-07T03:21:32Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/21280/ Interactional inhospitableness : a re-analysis of the mansplaining incident in Rebecca Solnit’s (2008) essay “Men Explain Things to Me” Rycker, Teun De The neologism “mansplaining” refers to a specific type of social behaviour in which “men [are] unnecessarily explaining things to women” (Bridges, 2021, p. 3). With the focus on “unnecessarily,” the verb “to mansplain” calls attention to cases of socio-pragmatic inappropriateness and more specifically to violations of the Gricean Maxim of Quantity. In addition, the creative use of the “man-” morpheme highlights the problematic gendered nature of the phenomenon. This article is an attempt to interpret mansplaining in terms of a notion of interactional inhospitableness. Using a broad-based socio-pragmatic, conversational, discourse-analytical, and praxeological perspective, it will explore the mansplaining interaction (henceforth, the incident) that was recounted and recontextualised in Solnit’s (2008) famous essay, “Men Explain Things to Me: Facts Didn’t Get in Their Way.” The main finding is that though manipulative turn-taking and exploitative epistemic authority played an important role, it was affective asymmetries that made Solnit’s (2008) mansplaining episode uniquely “noticeable.” At the party where the incident occurred, hospitableness and high-culture competition appeared as two defining but conflicting features. This conflict cast the three main participants – not only as reductively gendered interlocutors but – as a failed and failing host (referred to as “Mr. Very Important” in the essay) and two of his guests (Rebecca Solnit and Sallie). The wider relevance and application of a notion of interactional (in)hospitableness will be discussed. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2022 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/21280/1/TE%2010.pdf Rycker, Teun De (2022) Interactional inhospitableness : a re-analysis of the mansplaining incident in Rebecca Solnit’s (2008) essay “Men Explain Things to Me”. 3L; Language, Linguistics and Literature, 28 (4). pp. 137-151. ISSN 0128-5157 https://ejournal.ukm.my/3l/index
spellingShingle Rycker, Teun De
Interactional inhospitableness : a re-analysis of the mansplaining incident in Rebecca Solnit’s (2008) essay “Men Explain Things to Me”
title Interactional inhospitableness : a re-analysis of the mansplaining incident in Rebecca Solnit’s (2008) essay “Men Explain Things to Me”
title_full Interactional inhospitableness : a re-analysis of the mansplaining incident in Rebecca Solnit’s (2008) essay “Men Explain Things to Me”
title_fullStr Interactional inhospitableness : a re-analysis of the mansplaining incident in Rebecca Solnit’s (2008) essay “Men Explain Things to Me”
title_full_unstemmed Interactional inhospitableness : a re-analysis of the mansplaining incident in Rebecca Solnit’s (2008) essay “Men Explain Things to Me”
title_short Interactional inhospitableness : a re-analysis of the mansplaining incident in Rebecca Solnit’s (2008) essay “Men Explain Things to Me”
title_sort interactional inhospitableness a re analysis of the mansplaining incident in rebecca solnit s 2008 essay men explain things to me
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/21280/1/TE%2010.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ryckerteunde interactionalinhospitablenessareanalysisofthemansplainingincidentinrebeccasolnits2008essaymenexplainthingstome