An asymmetry in the spoken production of number agreement in second language English : adjacency or locality?

In English, subject-verb agreement is deemed to be ‘local’ if the controller (i.e., the subject) and the target (i.e., the main verb) are adjacent, but ‘non-local’ if these items are separated by one or more terminal nodes. Previous research indicates that second language English learners whose firs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Austin, Gavin, Huong Thi Linh Nguyen, Huong Thi Thu Nguyen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2023
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/21599/1/57789-204825-1-PB.pdf
_version_ 1796933459403341824
author Austin, Gavin
Huong Thi Linh Nguyen,
Huong Thi Thu Nguyen,
author_facet Austin, Gavin
Huong Thi Linh Nguyen,
Huong Thi Thu Nguyen,
author_sort Austin, Gavin
collection UKM
description In English, subject-verb agreement is deemed to be ‘local’ if the controller (i.e., the subject) and the target (i.e., the main verb) are adjacent, but ‘non-local’ if these items are separated by one or more terminal nodes. Previous research indicates that second language English learners whose first languages lack subject-verb agreement tend to supply inflection for this functional category less accurately in non-adjacent than adjacent contexts in spoken production. This asymmetry could be driven by either adjacency or locality, since, for subject-verb agreement at least, these two properties are aligned with each other. Phrase-internal agreement, by contrast, is local regardless of whether the controller (i.e., a determiner or quantifier) and the target (i.e., a noun) are adjacent or non-adjacent; hence, for this type of agreement, adjacency and locality are not aligned with each other. In the present study, we gave a sentence-construction task to 64 native speakers of Vietnamese, a language without inflection for number agreement. Suppliance of inflection was lower in non-adjacent than adjacent contexts phrase-internally, and therefore within the local domain itself. We concluded that what gave rise to the asymmetries in inflectional production in our study, and, by extension, also in previous research on subject-verb agreement, was not the distinction between local and non-local domains, but rather the one between adjacent and nonadjacent contexts for agreement. In so doing, we present a more parsimonious analysis of asymmetries in the spoken production of agreement inflection than the one currently available.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T04:47:32Z
format Article
id ukm.eprints-21599
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T04:47:32Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
record_format dspace
spelling ukm.eprints-215992023-05-19T08:58:30Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/21599/ An asymmetry in the spoken production of number agreement in second language English : adjacency or locality? Austin, Gavin Huong Thi Linh Nguyen, Huong Thi Thu Nguyen, In English, subject-verb agreement is deemed to be ‘local’ if the controller (i.e., the subject) and the target (i.e., the main verb) are adjacent, but ‘non-local’ if these items are separated by one or more terminal nodes. Previous research indicates that second language English learners whose first languages lack subject-verb agreement tend to supply inflection for this functional category less accurately in non-adjacent than adjacent contexts in spoken production. This asymmetry could be driven by either adjacency or locality, since, for subject-verb agreement at least, these two properties are aligned with each other. Phrase-internal agreement, by contrast, is local regardless of whether the controller (i.e., a determiner or quantifier) and the target (i.e., a noun) are adjacent or non-adjacent; hence, for this type of agreement, adjacency and locality are not aligned with each other. In the present study, we gave a sentence-construction task to 64 native speakers of Vietnamese, a language without inflection for number agreement. Suppliance of inflection was lower in non-adjacent than adjacent contexts phrase-internally, and therefore within the local domain itself. We concluded that what gave rise to the asymmetries in inflectional production in our study, and, by extension, also in previous research on subject-verb agreement, was not the distinction between local and non-local domains, but rather the one between adjacent and nonadjacent contexts for agreement. In so doing, we present a more parsimonious analysis of asymmetries in the spoken production of agreement inflection than the one currently available. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2023-02 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/21599/1/57789-204825-1-PB.pdf Austin, Gavin and Huong Thi Linh Nguyen, and Huong Thi Thu Nguyen, (2023) An asymmetry in the spoken production of number agreement in second language English : adjacency or locality? GEMA ; Online Journal of Language Studies, 23 (1). pp. 1-16. ISSN 1675-8021 https://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/issue/view/1578
spellingShingle Austin, Gavin
Huong Thi Linh Nguyen,
Huong Thi Thu Nguyen,
An asymmetry in the spoken production of number agreement in second language English : adjacency or locality?
title An asymmetry in the spoken production of number agreement in second language English : adjacency or locality?
title_full An asymmetry in the spoken production of number agreement in second language English : adjacency or locality?
title_fullStr An asymmetry in the spoken production of number agreement in second language English : adjacency or locality?
title_full_unstemmed An asymmetry in the spoken production of number agreement in second language English : adjacency or locality?
title_short An asymmetry in the spoken production of number agreement in second language English : adjacency or locality?
title_sort asymmetry in the spoken production of number agreement in second language english adjacency or locality
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/21599/1/57789-204825-1-PB.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT austingavin anasymmetryinthespokenproductionofnumberagreementinsecondlanguageenglishadjacencyorlocality
AT huongthilinhnguyen anasymmetryinthespokenproductionofnumberagreementinsecondlanguageenglishadjacencyorlocality
AT huongthithunguyen anasymmetryinthespokenproductionofnumberagreementinsecondlanguageenglishadjacencyorlocality
AT austingavin asymmetryinthespokenproductionofnumberagreementinsecondlanguageenglishadjacencyorlocality
AT huongthilinhnguyen asymmetryinthespokenproductionofnumberagreementinsecondlanguageenglishadjacencyorlocality
AT huongthithunguyen asymmetryinthespokenproductionofnumberagreementinsecondlanguageenglishadjacencyorlocality