Misinformation in communication studies: a review and bibliometric analysis

The dissemination of misinformation is a concern for political parties, news consumers and scholars of communication, and the purpose of this paper is to explore the current state, development, and important issues of misinformation research in the field of communication over the past decade. This s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xinyu, Li, Weize, Lyu, Sabariah Mohamed Salleh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2023
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23181/1/komunikasi_25.pdf
_version_ 1796933740764594176
author Xinyu, Li
Weize, Lyu
Sabariah Mohamed Salleh,
author_facet Xinyu, Li
Weize, Lyu
Sabariah Mohamed Salleh,
author_sort Xinyu, Li
collection UKM
description The dissemination of misinformation is a concern for political parties, news consumers and scholars of communication, and the purpose of this paper is to explore the current state, development, and important issues of misinformation research in the field of communication over the past decade. This study analysed 768 SSCI articles from the year 2014-2023 through the Web of Science database using bibliometrics. The study found that the number of published papers peaked in 2022 with 191 SSCI papers, and is considered the highest number recorded. Michael Hameleers, a scholar from the University of Amsterdam, U.S., are the largest contributor in research literature on misinformation in the field of communication at the macro, meso, and micro levels, respectively; meanwhile, "Health Communication" was the largest contributing journal. Three national level cooperation networks were seen through the cooperation network analysis, which were the United States of America, European and Asian cooperation networks; and from the institutional perspective, four basic cooperation networks were formed; whilst from the author perspective, the largest cooperation network had 22 researchers. These findings indicated that there is well-established cooperation network of authors research about misinformation in communication field. Through the citation and co-citation analysis, it was concluded that the most influential researcher in the field of communication is Emily K. Vraga. Through the cluster analysis of communication area, the misinformation studies was mainly found in the research of sharing information, governance, health, and politics. This study provides a macro framework for future researchers to examine pertinent issues of misinformation in the field of communication.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T03:47:03Z
format Article
id ukm.eprints-23181
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T03:47:03Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
record_format dspace
spelling ukm.eprints-231812024-03-11T08:13:35Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23181/ Misinformation in communication studies: a review and bibliometric analysis Xinyu, Li Weize, Lyu Sabariah Mohamed Salleh, The dissemination of misinformation is a concern for political parties, news consumers and scholars of communication, and the purpose of this paper is to explore the current state, development, and important issues of misinformation research in the field of communication over the past decade. This study analysed 768 SSCI articles from the year 2014-2023 through the Web of Science database using bibliometrics. The study found that the number of published papers peaked in 2022 with 191 SSCI papers, and is considered the highest number recorded. Michael Hameleers, a scholar from the University of Amsterdam, U.S., are the largest contributor in research literature on misinformation in the field of communication at the macro, meso, and micro levels, respectively; meanwhile, "Health Communication" was the largest contributing journal. Three national level cooperation networks were seen through the cooperation network analysis, which were the United States of America, European and Asian cooperation networks; and from the institutional perspective, four basic cooperation networks were formed; whilst from the author perspective, the largest cooperation network had 22 researchers. These findings indicated that there is well-established cooperation network of authors research about misinformation in communication field. Through the citation and co-citation analysis, it was concluded that the most influential researcher in the field of communication is Emily K. Vraga. Through the cluster analysis of communication area, the misinformation studies was mainly found in the research of sharing information, governance, health, and politics. This study provides a macro framework for future researchers to examine pertinent issues of misinformation in the field of communication. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2023 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23181/1/komunikasi_25.pdf Xinyu, Li and Weize, Lyu and Sabariah Mohamed Salleh, (2023) Misinformation in communication studies: a review and bibliometric analysis. Jurnal Komunikasi ; Malaysian Journal of Communication, 39 (4). pp. 467-488. ISSN 0128-1496 https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/issue/view/1610
spellingShingle Xinyu, Li
Weize, Lyu
Sabariah Mohamed Salleh,
Misinformation in communication studies: a review and bibliometric analysis
title Misinformation in communication studies: a review and bibliometric analysis
title_full Misinformation in communication studies: a review and bibliometric analysis
title_fullStr Misinformation in communication studies: a review and bibliometric analysis
title_full_unstemmed Misinformation in communication studies: a review and bibliometric analysis
title_short Misinformation in communication studies: a review and bibliometric analysis
title_sort misinformation in communication studies a review and bibliometric analysis
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23181/1/komunikasi_25.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT xinyuli misinformationincommunicationstudiesareviewandbibliometricanalysis
AT weizelyu misinformationincommunicationstudiesareviewandbibliometricanalysis
AT sabariahmohamedsalleh misinformationincommunicationstudiesareviewandbibliometricanalysis