The potential hazards of fake accounts and buzzer behaviour on deliberative democracy

The most famous political system globally is deliberative democracy, which involves the participatory engagement of free and fair citizens to achieve common interests through discussion-based reasoning and societal consensus. This system places all citizens on an equal footing in expressing their op...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rendra Widyatama, Maizatul Haizan Mahbob
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2024
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23842/1/komunikasi_18.pdf
_version_ 1811136866146058240
author Rendra Widyatama,
Maizatul Haizan Mahbob,
author_facet Rendra Widyatama,
Maizatul Haizan Mahbob,
author_sort Rendra Widyatama,
collection UKM
description The most famous political system globally is deliberative democracy, which involves the participatory engagement of free and fair citizens to achieve common interests through discussion-based reasoning and societal consensus. This system places all citizens on an equal footing in expressing their opinions and is a crucial indicator of the quality of deliberative democracy. The dynamics of deliberative democracy are also mirrored in the digital realm and often serve as indicators of public support. However, the digital sphere of democracy faces a severe threat today due to the proliferation of fake accounts and the practice of paying for buzzer behaviour. This phenomenon necessitates stringent regulation to ensure the continued quality and authenticity of deliberative democracy. This research describes the potential dangers of using fake accounts and paying for buzzer behaviour in politics concerning deliberative democracy. The researchers adopted an interpretive phenomenology approach, drawing data from various relevant sources. The research findings reveal that using fake accounts and paying for buzzer behaviour undermine deliberative democracy as they generate false information, manipulate public opinion, and hinder healthy dialogue. Additionally, using fake accounts and buzzer behaviour has severe psychological and social repercussions, including a decline in public trust and an increase in political polarization, all threatening the quality of democratic decision-making. The results of this research carry significant implications for designing relevant regulations to safeguard the agreed-upon and high-quality deliberative democracy, a vital asset of public governance.
first_indexed 2024-09-24T01:29:30Z
format Article
id ukm.eprints-23842
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-24T01:29:30Z
publishDate 2024
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
record_format dspace
spelling ukm.eprints-238422024-07-12T06:54:44Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23842/ The potential hazards of fake accounts and buzzer behaviour on deliberative democracy Rendra Widyatama, Maizatul Haizan Mahbob, The most famous political system globally is deliberative democracy, which involves the participatory engagement of free and fair citizens to achieve common interests through discussion-based reasoning and societal consensus. This system places all citizens on an equal footing in expressing their opinions and is a crucial indicator of the quality of deliberative democracy. The dynamics of deliberative democracy are also mirrored in the digital realm and often serve as indicators of public support. However, the digital sphere of democracy faces a severe threat today due to the proliferation of fake accounts and the practice of paying for buzzer behaviour. This phenomenon necessitates stringent regulation to ensure the continued quality and authenticity of deliberative democracy. This research describes the potential dangers of using fake accounts and paying for buzzer behaviour in politics concerning deliberative democracy. The researchers adopted an interpretive phenomenology approach, drawing data from various relevant sources. The research findings reveal that using fake accounts and paying for buzzer behaviour undermine deliberative democracy as they generate false information, manipulate public opinion, and hinder healthy dialogue. Additionally, using fake accounts and buzzer behaviour has severe psychological and social repercussions, including a decline in public trust and an increase in political polarization, all threatening the quality of democratic decision-making. The results of this research carry significant implications for designing relevant regulations to safeguard the agreed-upon and high-quality deliberative democracy, a vital asset of public governance. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2024 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23842/1/komunikasi_18.pdf Rendra Widyatama, and Maizatul Haizan Mahbob, (2024) The potential hazards of fake accounts and buzzer behaviour on deliberative democracy. Jurnal Komunikasi ; Malaysian Journal of Communication, 40 (1). pp. 324-341. ISSN 0128-1496 https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/issue/view/1644
spellingShingle Rendra Widyatama,
Maizatul Haizan Mahbob,
The potential hazards of fake accounts and buzzer behaviour on deliberative democracy
title The potential hazards of fake accounts and buzzer behaviour on deliberative democracy
title_full The potential hazards of fake accounts and buzzer behaviour on deliberative democracy
title_fullStr The potential hazards of fake accounts and buzzer behaviour on deliberative democracy
title_full_unstemmed The potential hazards of fake accounts and buzzer behaviour on deliberative democracy
title_short The potential hazards of fake accounts and buzzer behaviour on deliberative democracy
title_sort potential hazards of fake accounts and buzzer behaviour on deliberative democracy
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/23842/1/komunikasi_18.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rendrawidyatama thepotentialhazardsoffakeaccountsandbuzzerbehaviourondeliberativedemocracy
AT maizatulhaizanmahbob thepotentialhazardsoffakeaccountsandbuzzerbehaviourondeliberativedemocracy
AT rendrawidyatama potentialhazardsoffakeaccountsandbuzzerbehaviourondeliberativedemocracy
AT maizatulhaizanmahbob potentialhazardsoffakeaccountsandbuzzerbehaviourondeliberativedemocracy