Crossing ethnic borders in Malaysia measuring the fluidity of ethnic identity and group formation

Scholar studying ethnic and race relations often locate the question of identity and group formation as given and unaltered (Geertz 1963) while Barth (1969), Banton (1983) and Shamsul (1996) have been arguing that no group maintains itself. This article belongs to the latter academic tradition in tr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mansor Mohd Noor
Format: Article
Published: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 1999
_version_ 1796928008039170048
author Mansor Mohd Noor,
author_facet Mansor Mohd Noor,
author_sort Mansor Mohd Noor,
collection UKM
description Scholar studying ethnic and race relations often locate the question of identity and group formation as given and unaltered (Geertz 1963) while Barth (1969), Banton (1983) and Shamsul (1996) have been arguing that no group maintains itself. This article belongs to the latter academic tradition in trying also the micro levels; it analyses both the group and individual alignments, as well as the authority-defined and the everyday defined identities. Data colleted from five studies carried out in the Klang Valley and Penang between 1990 and 1988 is utilised to show that universalistic norms of self interest over-ride the concern for ethnic preference. Respondents show that they share some common values and their interactions cross ethnic borders. Pluralism is an accepted social reality in Malaysia and ehnicity is secondary rather than primary.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T03:52:47Z
format Article
id ukm.eprints-4170
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
last_indexed 2024-03-06T03:52:47Z
publishDate 1999
publisher Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
record_format dspace
spelling ukm.eprints-41702012-05-23T07:38:25Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/4170/ Crossing ethnic borders in Malaysia measuring the fluidity of ethnic identity and group formation Mansor Mohd Noor, Scholar studying ethnic and race relations often locate the question of identity and group formation as given and unaltered (Geertz 1963) while Barth (1969), Banton (1983) and Shamsul (1996) have been arguing that no group maintains itself. This article belongs to the latter academic tradition in trying also the micro levels; it analyses both the group and individual alignments, as well as the authority-defined and the everyday defined identities. Data colleted from five studies carried out in the Klang Valley and Penang between 1990 and 1988 is utilised to show that universalistic norms of self interest over-ride the concern for ethnic preference. Respondents show that they share some common values and their interactions cross ethnic borders. Pluralism is an accepted social reality in Malaysia and ehnicity is secondary rather than primary. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 1999-07 Article PeerReviewed Mansor Mohd Noor, (1999) Crossing ethnic borders in Malaysia measuring the fluidity of ethnic identity and group formation. AKADEMIKA, 55 . pp. 61-82. ISSN 0126-5008 http://pkukmweb.ukm.my/penerbit/jdem55-03.html
spellingShingle Mansor Mohd Noor,
Crossing ethnic borders in Malaysia measuring the fluidity of ethnic identity and group formation
title Crossing ethnic borders in Malaysia measuring the fluidity of ethnic identity and group formation
title_full Crossing ethnic borders in Malaysia measuring the fluidity of ethnic identity and group formation
title_fullStr Crossing ethnic borders in Malaysia measuring the fluidity of ethnic identity and group formation
title_full_unstemmed Crossing ethnic borders in Malaysia measuring the fluidity of ethnic identity and group formation
title_short Crossing ethnic borders in Malaysia measuring the fluidity of ethnic identity and group formation
title_sort crossing ethnic borders in malaysia measuring the fluidity of ethnic identity and group formation
work_keys_str_mv AT mansormohdnoor crossingethnicbordersinmalaysiameasuringthefluidityofethnicidentityandgroupformation