Exploratory factor analysis on Hurtt’s professional skepticism scale:a Malaysian perspective

In auditing, professional skepticism refers to an attitude that requires ongoing questioning and critical assessment of evidence. An auditor needs to exercise professional skepticism to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to determine whether financial statements are free from material...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sayed Alwee Hussnie Sayed Hussin, Takiah Mohd Iskandar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: FEP 2013
Online Access:http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7018/1/vol4ch2.pdf
_version_ 1825725926707560448
author Sayed Alwee Hussnie Sayed Hussin,
Takiah Mohd Iskandar,
author_facet Sayed Alwee Hussnie Sayed Hussin,
Takiah Mohd Iskandar,
author_sort Sayed Alwee Hussnie Sayed Hussin,
collection UKM
description In auditing, professional skepticism refers to an attitude that requires ongoing questioning and critical assessment of evidence. An auditor needs to exercise professional skepticism to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to determine whether financial statements are free from material misstatements due to errors or frauds. Hurtt (2010) developed a professional skepticism scale to measure the level of an auditor’s skepticism. However, the exercise of professional skepticism among auditors is very subjective and difficult to measure. The validity of the Hurtt skepticism scale in the context of different countries requires further examination. A factor analysis study is conducted to validate the suitability of the instrument based on Malaysian data. The results indicate that only five of the Hurtt (2010) skepticism traits are relevant in determining professional skepticism in the Malaysian environment. The suspension of judgment trait seems to be irrelevant since respondents feel that this trait requires more time to make audit decisions and may delay audit work. Malaysian auditors are not likely to possess such a trait because they are burdened with numerous audit tasks that must be completed by a deadline. The results suggest that variances may exist across different countries due to differences in environment.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T04:03:06Z
format Article
id ukm.eprints-7018
institution Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T04:03:06Z
publishDate 2013
publisher FEP
record_format dspace
spelling ukm.eprints-70182016-12-14T06:42:52Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7018/ Exploratory factor analysis on Hurtt’s professional skepticism scale:a Malaysian perspective Sayed Alwee Hussnie Sayed Hussin, Takiah Mohd Iskandar, In auditing, professional skepticism refers to an attitude that requires ongoing questioning and critical assessment of evidence. An auditor needs to exercise professional skepticism to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence to determine whether financial statements are free from material misstatements due to errors or frauds. Hurtt (2010) developed a professional skepticism scale to measure the level of an auditor’s skepticism. However, the exercise of professional skepticism among auditors is very subjective and difficult to measure. The validity of the Hurtt skepticism scale in the context of different countries requires further examination. A factor analysis study is conducted to validate the suitability of the instrument based on Malaysian data. The results indicate that only five of the Hurtt (2010) skepticism traits are relevant in determining professional skepticism in the Malaysian environment. The suspension of judgment trait seems to be irrelevant since respondents feel that this trait requires more time to make audit decisions and may delay audit work. Malaysian auditors are not likely to possess such a trait because they are burdened with numerous audit tasks that must be completed by a deadline. The results suggest that variances may exist across different countries due to differences in environment. FEP 2013 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7018/1/vol4ch2.pdf Sayed Alwee Hussnie Sayed Hussin, and Takiah Mohd Iskandar, (2013) Exploratory factor analysis on Hurtt’s professional skepticism scale:a Malaysian perspective. Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 4 . pp. 11-19. ISSN 2180-3838 http://www.ukm.my/ajag/index.html
spellingShingle Sayed Alwee Hussnie Sayed Hussin,
Takiah Mohd Iskandar,
Exploratory factor analysis on Hurtt’s professional skepticism scale:a Malaysian perspective
title Exploratory factor analysis on Hurtt’s professional skepticism scale:a Malaysian perspective
title_full Exploratory factor analysis on Hurtt’s professional skepticism scale:a Malaysian perspective
title_fullStr Exploratory factor analysis on Hurtt’s professional skepticism scale:a Malaysian perspective
title_full_unstemmed Exploratory factor analysis on Hurtt’s professional skepticism scale:a Malaysian perspective
title_short Exploratory factor analysis on Hurtt’s professional skepticism scale:a Malaysian perspective
title_sort exploratory factor analysis on hurtt s professional skepticism scale a malaysian perspective
url http://journalarticle.ukm.my/7018/1/vol4ch2.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sayedalweehussniesayedhussin exploratoryfactoranalysisonhurttsprofessionalskepticismscaleamalaysianperspective
AT takiahmohdiskandar exploratoryfactoranalysisonhurttsprofessionalskepticismscaleamalaysianperspective