An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India
Introduction: Mass drug administration (MDA) means once-in-a-year administration of Diethyl Carbamazine (DEC) tablet to all people (excluding children under 2 years, pregnant women and severely ill persons) in identified endemic areas. It aims at cessation of transmission of Lymphatic Filariasis. T...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
2015
|
| Online Access: | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8829/1/vol_5_no_1_2015_69_%281%29.pdf |
| _version_ | 1796930849715781632 |
|---|---|
| author | Rohit, Trivedi, Sandeep, Singh Paharam, Adhikari Sukhendra, Pratap Singh Manoj, Saxena |
| author_facet | Rohit, Trivedi, Sandeep, Singh Paharam, Adhikari Sukhendra, Pratap Singh Manoj, Saxena |
| author_sort | Rohit, Trivedi, |
| collection | UKM |
| description | Introduction: Mass drug administration (MDA) means once-in-a-year administration of Diethyl Carbamazine (DEC) tablet to all people (excluding children under 2 years, pregnant women and severely ill persons) in identified endemic areas.
It aims at cessation of transmission of Lymphatic Filariasis. To study the coverage and compliance of MDA in Satna district during the campaign in June 2013.
Methods: Cross-sectional observational study. Setting: Urban And Rural Areas In Satna District Identified As Endemic For Filariasis Where MDA 2013 Was Undertaken. Study Variables: Exploratory - Rural and urban clusters of Satna
district; Outcome - coverage, compliance, actual coverage, side effects.
Results: Four clusters, each comprising 30 households from the Satna endemic district, yielded an eligible population of 650 (95.87%) of total 678. The coverage was 586 (90.15% out of eligible population) with variation across different areas. The compliance with drug ingestion was 88.05% with a gap of 11.95% to be targeted by intensive IEC. The effective coverage (79.38%) was below the target (85%). Side effects of DEC were minimum, transient and drug-specific.
Conclusions: Overall coverage was marginally better in rural areas. The causes of poor coverage and compliance have been discussed and relevant suggestions have been made. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T04:09:17Z |
| format | Article |
| id | ukm.eprints-8829 |
| institution | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T04:09:17Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | ukm.eprints-88292016-12-14T06:48:10Z http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8829/ An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India Rohit, Trivedi, Sandeep, Singh Paharam, Adhikari Sukhendra, Pratap Singh Manoj, Saxena Introduction: Mass drug administration (MDA) means once-in-a-year administration of Diethyl Carbamazine (DEC) tablet to all people (excluding children under 2 years, pregnant women and severely ill persons) in identified endemic areas. It aims at cessation of transmission of Lymphatic Filariasis. To study the coverage and compliance of MDA in Satna district during the campaign in June 2013. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study. Setting: Urban And Rural Areas In Satna District Identified As Endemic For Filariasis Where MDA 2013 Was Undertaken. Study Variables: Exploratory - Rural and urban clusters of Satna district; Outcome - coverage, compliance, actual coverage, side effects. Results: Four clusters, each comprising 30 households from the Satna endemic district, yielded an eligible population of 650 (95.87%) of total 678. The coverage was 586 (90.15% out of eligible population) with variation across different areas. The compliance with drug ingestion was 88.05% with a gap of 11.95% to be targeted by intensive IEC. The effective coverage (79.38%) was below the target (85%). Side effects of DEC were minimum, transient and drug-specific. Conclusions: Overall coverage was marginally better in rural areas. The causes of poor coverage and compliance have been discussed and relevant suggestions have been made. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2015-06-19 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8829/1/vol_5_no_1_2015_69_%281%29.pdf Rohit, Trivedi, and Sandeep, Singh and Paharam, Adhikari and Sukhendra, Pratap Singh and Manoj, Saxena (2015) An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India. International Journal of Public Health Research, 5 (1). pp. 538-542. ISSN 2232-0245 www.ijphr.ukm.my |
| spellingShingle | Rohit, Trivedi, Sandeep, Singh Paharam, Adhikari Sukhendra, Pratap Singh Manoj, Saxena An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India |
| title | An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India |
| title_full | An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India |
| title_fullStr | An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India |
| title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India |
| title_short | An evaluation of compliance of Mass Drug Administration (MDA) against Lymphatic Filariasis of Satna district of Madhya Pradesh, India |
| title_sort | evaluation of compliance of mass drug administration mda against lymphatic filariasis of satna district of madhya pradesh india |
| url | http://journalarticle.ukm.my/8829/1/vol_5_no_1_2015_69_%281%29.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rohittrivedi anevaluationofcomplianceofmassdrugadministrationmdaagainstlymphaticfilariasisofsatnadistrictofmadhyapradeshindia AT sandeepsingh anevaluationofcomplianceofmassdrugadministrationmdaagainstlymphaticfilariasisofsatnadistrictofmadhyapradeshindia AT paharamadhikari anevaluationofcomplianceofmassdrugadministrationmdaagainstlymphaticfilariasisofsatnadistrictofmadhyapradeshindia AT sukhendrapratapsingh anevaluationofcomplianceofmassdrugadministrationmdaagainstlymphaticfilariasisofsatnadistrictofmadhyapradeshindia AT manojsaxena anevaluationofcomplianceofmassdrugadministrationmdaagainstlymphaticfilariasisofsatnadistrictofmadhyapradeshindia AT rohittrivedi evaluationofcomplianceofmassdrugadministrationmdaagainstlymphaticfilariasisofsatnadistrictofmadhyapradeshindia AT sandeepsingh evaluationofcomplianceofmassdrugadministrationmdaagainstlymphaticfilariasisofsatnadistrictofmadhyapradeshindia AT paharamadhikari evaluationofcomplianceofmassdrugadministrationmdaagainstlymphaticfilariasisofsatnadistrictofmadhyapradeshindia AT sukhendrapratapsingh evaluationofcomplianceofmassdrugadministrationmdaagainstlymphaticfilariasisofsatnadistrictofmadhyapradeshindia AT manojsaxena evaluationofcomplianceofmassdrugadministrationmdaagainstlymphaticfilariasisofsatnadistrictofmadhyapradeshindia |