The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: a randomized controlled trial
Background. Non-attendance is common in primary care and previous studies have reported that reminders were useful in reducing broken appointments. Objective. To determine the effectiveness of a text messaging reminder in improving attendance in primary care. Design. Multicentre three-arm randomized...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.um.edu.my/10332/1/Leong-2006-The_use_of_text_mess.pdf |
_version_ | 1796946056970240000 |
---|---|
author | Leong, K.C. Chen, W.S. Leong, K.W. Mastura, I. Mimi, O. Sheikh, M.A. Zailinawati, A.H. Ng, C.J. Phua, K.L. Teng, C.L. |
author_facet | Leong, K.C. Chen, W.S. Leong, K.W. Mastura, I. Mimi, O. Sheikh, M.A. Zailinawati, A.H. Ng, C.J. Phua, K.L. Teng, C.L. |
author_sort | Leong, K.C. |
collection | UM |
description | Background. Non-attendance is common in primary care and previous studies have reported that reminders were useful in reducing broken appointments. Objective. To determine the effectiveness of a text messaging reminder in improving attendance in primary care. Design. Multicentre three-arm randomized controlled trial. Setting. Seven primary care clinics in Malaysia. Participants. Patients (or their caregivers) who required follow-up at the clinics between 48 hours and 3 months from the recruitment date. Interventions. Two intervention arms consisted of text messaging and mobile phone reminders 24-48 hours prior to scheduled appointments. Control group did not receive any intervention. Outcome measures. Attendance rates and costs of interventions. Results. A total of 993 participants were eligible for analysis. Attendance rates of control, text messaging and mobile phone reminder groups were 48.1, 59.0 and 59.6, respectively. The attendance rate of the text messaging reminder group was significantly higher compared with that of the control group (odds ratio 1.59, 95 confidence interval 1.17 to 2.17, P = 0.005). There was no statistically significant difference in attendance rates between text messaging and mobile phone reminder groups. The cost of text messaging reminder (RM 0.45 per attendance) was lower than mobile phone reminder (RM 0.82 per attendance). Conclusions. Text messaging reminder system was effective in improving attendance rate in primary care. It was more cost-effective compared with the mobile phone reminder. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-06T05:25:54Z |
format | Article |
id | um.eprints-10332 |
institution | Universiti Malaya |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-06T05:25:54Z |
publishDate | 2006 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | um.eprints-103322019-08-08T01:48:34Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/10332/ The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: a randomized controlled trial Leong, K.C. Chen, W.S. Leong, K.W. Mastura, I. Mimi, O. Sheikh, M.A. Zailinawati, A.H. Ng, C.J. Phua, K.L. Teng, C.L. R Medicine Background. Non-attendance is common in primary care and previous studies have reported that reminders were useful in reducing broken appointments. Objective. To determine the effectiveness of a text messaging reminder in improving attendance in primary care. Design. Multicentre three-arm randomized controlled trial. Setting. Seven primary care clinics in Malaysia. Participants. Patients (or their caregivers) who required follow-up at the clinics between 48 hours and 3 months from the recruitment date. Interventions. Two intervention arms consisted of text messaging and mobile phone reminders 24-48 hours prior to scheduled appointments. Control group did not receive any intervention. Outcome measures. Attendance rates and costs of interventions. Results. A total of 993 participants were eligible for analysis. Attendance rates of control, text messaging and mobile phone reminder groups were 48.1, 59.0 and 59.6, respectively. The attendance rate of the text messaging reminder group was significantly higher compared with that of the control group (odds ratio 1.59, 95 confidence interval 1.17 to 2.17, P = 0.005). There was no statistically significant difference in attendance rates between text messaging and mobile phone reminder groups. The cost of text messaging reminder (RM 0.45 per attendance) was lower than mobile phone reminder (RM 0.82 per attendance). Conclusions. Text messaging reminder system was effective in improving attendance rate in primary care. It was more cost-effective compared with the mobile phone reminder. Oxford University Press 2006 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.um.edu.my/10332/1/Leong-2006-The_use_of_text_mess.pdf Leong, K.C. and Chen, W.S. and Leong, K.W. and Mastura, I. and Mimi, O. and Sheikh, M.A. and Zailinawati, A.H. and Ng, C.J. and Phua, K.L. and Teng, C.L. (2006) The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Family Practice, 23 (6). pp. 699-705. ISSN 0263-2136, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16916871 |
spellingShingle | R Medicine Leong, K.C. Chen, W.S. Leong, K.W. Mastura, I. Mimi, O. Sheikh, M.A. Zailinawati, A.H. Ng, C.J. Phua, K.L. Teng, C.L. The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: a randomized controlled trial |
title | The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | The use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | use of text messaging to improve attendance in primary care a randomized controlled trial |
topic | R Medicine |
url | http://eprints.um.edu.my/10332/1/Leong-2006-The_use_of_text_mess.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leongkc theuseoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenws theuseoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leongkw theuseoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT masturai theuseoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mimio theuseoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sheikhma theuseoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zailinawatiah theuseoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ngcj theuseoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT phuakl theuseoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tengcl theuseoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leongkc useoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chenws useoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leongkw useoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT masturai useoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mimio useoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sheikhma useoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zailinawatiah useoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ngcj useoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT phuakl useoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tengcl useoftextmessagingtoimproveattendanceinprimarycarearandomizedcontrolledtrial |