Performance comparisons of AOMDV and OLSR routing protocols for mobile ad hoc network

A Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) eliminates the complexity of an infrastructured configuration and allows wireless devices to communicate with each other on the fly for any application. It does not rely on a base station to coordinate the flow of messages to nodes in the network. A primary challenge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oo, M.Z., Othman, M.
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/11132/1/Performance_Comparisons_of_AOMDV_and_OLSR.pdf
_version_ 1825719969986379776
author Oo, M.Z.
Othman, M.
author_facet Oo, M.Z.
Othman, M.
author_sort Oo, M.Z.
collection UM
description A Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) eliminates the complexity of an infrastructured configuration and allows wireless devices to communicate with each other on the fly for any application. It does not rely on a base station to coordinate the flow of messages to nodes in the network. A primary challenge is for each device to maintain the information to properly route traffic and data packets. In this paper, we analyze the performance differences of Ad hoc On-demand Multi-path Distance Vector (AOMDV) and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) routing protocols. We evaluate their performance through simulation using network simulator (ns- 2). We analyse the strengths and weaknesses of these two protocols by measuring packet loss rates (%), average end to end delay (sec), and normalized routing load.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T05:27:51Z
format Conference or Workshop Item
id um.eprints-11132
institution Universiti Malaya
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T05:27:51Z
publishDate 2010
record_format dspace
spelling um.eprints-111322014-12-17T03:21:28Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/11132/ Performance comparisons of AOMDV and OLSR routing protocols for mobile ad hoc network Oo, M.Z. Othman, M. QA Mathematics A Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) eliminates the complexity of an infrastructured configuration and allows wireless devices to communicate with each other on the fly for any application. It does not rely on a base station to coordinate the flow of messages to nodes in the network. A primary challenge is for each device to maintain the information to properly route traffic and data packets. In this paper, we analyze the performance differences of Ad hoc On-demand Multi-path Distance Vector (AOMDV) and Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) routing protocols. We evaluate their performance through simulation using network simulator (ns- 2). We analyse the strengths and weaknesses of these two protocols by measuring packet loss rates (%), average end to end delay (sec), and normalized routing load. 2010-03 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.um.edu.my/11132/1/Performance_Comparisons_of_AOMDV_and_OLSR.pdf Oo, M.Z. and Othman, M. (2010) Performance comparisons of AOMDV and OLSR routing protocols for mobile ad hoc network. In: 2010 Second International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications, 19-21 March 2010, Bali, Indonesia.
spellingShingle QA Mathematics
Oo, M.Z.
Othman, M.
Performance comparisons of AOMDV and OLSR routing protocols for mobile ad hoc network
title Performance comparisons of AOMDV and OLSR routing protocols for mobile ad hoc network
title_full Performance comparisons of AOMDV and OLSR routing protocols for mobile ad hoc network
title_fullStr Performance comparisons of AOMDV and OLSR routing protocols for mobile ad hoc network
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparisons of AOMDV and OLSR routing protocols for mobile ad hoc network
title_short Performance comparisons of AOMDV and OLSR routing protocols for mobile ad hoc network
title_sort performance comparisons of aomdv and olsr routing protocols for mobile ad hoc network
topic QA Mathematics
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/11132/1/Performance_Comparisons_of_AOMDV_and_OLSR.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT oomz performancecomparisonsofaomdvandolsrroutingprotocolsformobileadhocnetwork
AT othmanm performancecomparisonsofaomdvandolsrroutingprotocolsformobileadhocnetwork