Biomechanical stress distribution on fixation screws used in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Assessment of 9 methods via finite element method

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the biomechanical stress tolerance of screws used in 9 fixation methods after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy to determine which configuration leads to lesser force load on the cortical bone at fixation points. Materials and Methods: A 3-dimensio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bohluli, B., Motamedi, M.H.K.., Bohluli, P., Sarkarat, F., Moharamnejad, N., Tabrizi, M.H.S.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 2010
Subjects:
_version_ 1825720133913411584
author Bohluli, B.
Motamedi, M.H.K..
Bohluli, P.
Sarkarat, F.
Moharamnejad, N.
Tabrizi, M.H.S.
author_facet Bohluli, B.
Motamedi, M.H.K..
Bohluli, P.
Sarkarat, F.
Moharamnejad, N.
Tabrizi, M.H.S.
author_sort Bohluli, B.
collection UM
description Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the biomechanical stress tolerance of screws used in 9 fixation methods after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy to determine which configuration leads to lesser force load on the cortical bone at fixation points. Materials and Methods: A 3-dimensional computerized model of a human mandible with posterior teeth was generated. The bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy was virtually performed on this model. The separated model was assembled with 9 fixation methods: single screw, 2 screws one behind the other, 2 screws one below the other, 3 screws in an L configuration, 3 screws in an inverted backward L configuration, miniplate with 2 screws, miniplate with 4 screws, 2 parallel plates (upper + lower border), and square miniplate with 4 screws. Then, 75-, 135-, and 600-N vertical loads were applied on the posterior teeth of these models. The stress distribution on the screw sites on the buccal cortex was measured by the finite element method. Results: In this model all the fixation methods withstood forces between 75 and 135 N. However, the single-screw and the 2-hole miniplate models showed that the stress distributions in the configurations were intolerable when 600 N of posterior force was applied. The results of this study indicated that the inverted backward L configuration with 3 bicortical screws was the most stable. Conclusion: Although this study indicated that the inverted backward L configuration with 3 bicortical screws was the most stable pattern, most of the patterns had adequate stability for clinical applications (mean, 125 N). (c) 2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:2765-2769, 2010
first_indexed 2024-03-06T05:30:23Z
format Article
id um.eprints-12105
institution Universiti Malaya
last_indexed 2024-03-06T05:30:23Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling um.eprints-121052015-01-16T02:28:12Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/12105/ Biomechanical stress distribution on fixation screws used in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Assessment of 9 methods via finite element method Bohluli, B. Motamedi, M.H.K.. Bohluli, P. Sarkarat, F. Moharamnejad, N. Tabrizi, M.H.S. Q Science (General) Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the biomechanical stress tolerance of screws used in 9 fixation methods after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy to determine which configuration leads to lesser force load on the cortical bone at fixation points. Materials and Methods: A 3-dimensional computerized model of a human mandible with posterior teeth was generated. The bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy was virtually performed on this model. The separated model was assembled with 9 fixation methods: single screw, 2 screws one behind the other, 2 screws one below the other, 3 screws in an L configuration, 3 screws in an inverted backward L configuration, miniplate with 2 screws, miniplate with 4 screws, 2 parallel plates (upper + lower border), and square miniplate with 4 screws. Then, 75-, 135-, and 600-N vertical loads were applied on the posterior teeth of these models. The stress distribution on the screw sites on the buccal cortex was measured by the finite element method. Results: In this model all the fixation methods withstood forces between 75 and 135 N. However, the single-screw and the 2-hole miniplate models showed that the stress distributions in the configurations were intolerable when 600 N of posterior force was applied. The results of this study indicated that the inverted backward L configuration with 3 bicortical screws was the most stable. Conclusion: Although this study indicated that the inverted backward L configuration with 3 bicortical screws was the most stable pattern, most of the patterns had adequate stability for clinical applications (mean, 125 N). (c) 2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:2765-2769, 2010 Elsevier 2010 Article PeerReviewed Bohluli, B. and Motamedi, M.H.K.. and Bohluli, P. and Sarkarat, F. and Moharamnejad, N. and Tabrizi, M.H.S. (2010) Biomechanical stress distribution on fixation screws used in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Assessment of 9 methods via finite element method. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 68 (11). pp. 2765-2769.
spellingShingle Q Science (General)
Bohluli, B.
Motamedi, M.H.K..
Bohluli, P.
Sarkarat, F.
Moharamnejad, N.
Tabrizi, M.H.S.
Biomechanical stress distribution on fixation screws used in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Assessment of 9 methods via finite element method
title Biomechanical stress distribution on fixation screws used in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Assessment of 9 methods via finite element method
title_full Biomechanical stress distribution on fixation screws used in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Assessment of 9 methods via finite element method
title_fullStr Biomechanical stress distribution on fixation screws used in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Assessment of 9 methods via finite element method
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical stress distribution on fixation screws used in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Assessment of 9 methods via finite element method
title_short Biomechanical stress distribution on fixation screws used in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: Assessment of 9 methods via finite element method
title_sort biomechanical stress distribution on fixation screws used in bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy assessment of 9 methods via finite element method
topic Q Science (General)
work_keys_str_mv AT bohlulib biomechanicalstressdistributiononfixationscrewsusedinbilateralsagittalsplitramusosteotomyassessmentof9methodsviafiniteelementmethod
AT motamedimhk biomechanicalstressdistributiononfixationscrewsusedinbilateralsagittalsplitramusosteotomyassessmentof9methodsviafiniteelementmethod
AT bohlulip biomechanicalstressdistributiononfixationscrewsusedinbilateralsagittalsplitramusosteotomyassessmentof9methodsviafiniteelementmethod
AT sarkaratf biomechanicalstressdistributiononfixationscrewsusedinbilateralsagittalsplitramusosteotomyassessmentof9methodsviafiniteelementmethod
AT moharamnejadn biomechanicalstressdistributiononfixationscrewsusedinbilateralsagittalsplitramusosteotomyassessmentof9methodsviafiniteelementmethod
AT tabrizimhs biomechanicalstressdistributiononfixationscrewsusedinbilateralsagittalsplitramusosteotomyassessmentof9methodsviafiniteelementmethod