Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal
Various peak models have been introduced to detect and analyze peaks in the time domain analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In general, peak model in the time domain analysis consists of a set of signal parameters, such as amplitude, width, and slope. Models including those proposed by D...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
SpringerOpen
2016
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1825721041881661440 |
|---|---|
| author | Adam, A. Ibrahim, Z. Mokhtar, N. Shapiai, M.I. Cumming, P. Mubin, M. |
| author_facet | Adam, A. Ibrahim, Z. Mokhtar, N. Shapiai, M.I. Cumming, P. Mubin, M. |
| author_sort | Adam, A. |
| collection | UM |
| description | Various peak models have been introduced to detect and analyze peaks in the time domain analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In general, peak model in the time domain analysis consists of a set of signal parameters, such as amplitude, width, and slope. Models including those proposed by Dumpala, Acir, Liu, and Dingle are routinely used to detect peaks in EEG signals acquired in clinical studies of epilepsy or eye blink. The optimal peak model is the most reliable peak detection performance in a particular application. A fair measure of performance of different models requires a common and unbiased platform. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the four different peak models using the extreme learning machine (ELM)-based peak detection algorithm. We found that the Dingle model gave the best performance, with 72 % accuracy in the analysis of real EEG data. Statistical analysis conferred that the Dingle model afforded significantly better mean testing accuracy than did the Acir and Liu models, which were in the range 37–52 %. Meanwhile, the Dingle model has no significant difference compared to Dumpala model. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T05:44:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | um.eprints-18054 |
| institution | Universiti Malaya |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T05:44:19Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | SpringerOpen |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | um.eprints-180542017-10-23T04:20:48Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/18054/ Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal Adam, A. Ibrahim, Z. Mokhtar, N. Shapiai, M.I. Cumming, P. Mubin, M. TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering Various peak models have been introduced to detect and analyze peaks in the time domain analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. In general, peak model in the time domain analysis consists of a set of signal parameters, such as amplitude, width, and slope. Models including those proposed by Dumpala, Acir, Liu, and Dingle are routinely used to detect peaks in EEG signals acquired in clinical studies of epilepsy or eye blink. The optimal peak model is the most reliable peak detection performance in a particular application. A fair measure of performance of different models requires a common and unbiased platform. In this study, we evaluate the performance of the four different peak models using the extreme learning machine (ELM)-based peak detection algorithm. We found that the Dingle model gave the best performance, with 72 % accuracy in the analysis of real EEG data. Statistical analysis conferred that the Dingle model afforded significantly better mean testing accuracy than did the Acir and Liu models, which were in the range 37–52 %. Meanwhile, the Dingle model has no significant difference compared to Dumpala model. SpringerOpen 2016 Article PeerReviewed Adam, A. and Ibrahim, Z. and Mokhtar, N. and Shapiai, M.I. and Cumming, P. and Mubin, M. (2016) Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal. SpringerPlus, 5 (1). p. 1036. ISSN 2193-1801, DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0 <https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0>. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0 doi:10.1186/s40064-016-2697-0 |
| spellingShingle | TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering Adam, A. Ibrahim, Z. Mokhtar, N. Shapiai, M.I. Cumming, P. Mubin, M. Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal |
| title | Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal |
| title_full | Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal |
| title_short | Evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine-based peak detection for EEG signal |
| title_sort | evaluation of different time domain peak models using extreme learning machine based peak detection for eeg signal |
| topic | TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT adama evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal AT ibrahimz evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal AT mokhtarn evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal AT shapiaimi evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal AT cummingp evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal AT mubinm evaluationofdifferenttimedomainpeakmodelsusingextremelearningmachinebasedpeakdetectionforeegsignal |