Do African microfinance institutions need efficiency for financial stability and social outreach?
Microfinance institutions (MFIs) have the dual objective of providing social welfare and financial stability. We evaluated the financial efficiency of MFIs in sub-Saharan African countries by comparing their regional performances during the period 2004'2013. We addressed prevailing MFI heteroge...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Academy of Science of South Africa
2016
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1796960484074717184 |
|---|---|
| author | Azad, M.A.K. Munisamy, S. Masum, A.K.M. Wanke, P. |
| author_facet | Azad, M.A.K. Munisamy, S. Masum, A.K.M. Wanke, P. |
| author_sort | Azad, M.A.K. |
| collection | UM |
| description | Microfinance institutions (MFIs) have the dual objective of providing social welfare and financial stability. We evaluated the financial efficiency of MFIs in sub-Saharan African countries by comparing their regional performances during the period 2004'2013. We addressed prevailing MFI heterogeneity by using the concept of 'metafrontier'. The results showed that on an average, more than half the MFIs showed a drop in productivity. The measure of how much one country gets closer to or further away from world frontier technology is commonly known as the TGC score. In world frontier technology, East and South Asian countries have taken the lead (TGC score 1.0048) while sub-Saharan African countries lag behind (TGC score 1.0020). Most East and South Asian countries have a TGC score of 1, and most sub-Saharan African countries have a TGC score less than 1. This signifies that Asian countries lead world frontier technology and most African countries do not. The decomposition of efficiency scores showed that with regard to technical changes, African nations had progressed on average only 0.01%, and efficiency change scores had regressed by 0.59% annually. Significance: • First efficiency study on microfinance institutions and their heterogeneity in Africa. • The results show robust discrimination among the efficiency scores. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T05:45:18Z |
| format | Article |
| id | um.eprints-18398 |
| institution | Universiti Malaya |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T05:45:18Z |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publisher | Academy of Science of South Africa |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | um.eprints-183982017-11-30T07:17:31Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/18398/ Do African microfinance institutions need efficiency for financial stability and social outreach? Azad, M.A.K. Munisamy, S. Masum, A.K.M. Wanke, P. HF Commerce HG Finance Microfinance institutions (MFIs) have the dual objective of providing social welfare and financial stability. We evaluated the financial efficiency of MFIs in sub-Saharan African countries by comparing their regional performances during the period 2004'2013. We addressed prevailing MFI heterogeneity by using the concept of 'metafrontier'. The results showed that on an average, more than half the MFIs showed a drop in productivity. The measure of how much one country gets closer to or further away from world frontier technology is commonly known as the TGC score. In world frontier technology, East and South Asian countries have taken the lead (TGC score 1.0048) while sub-Saharan African countries lag behind (TGC score 1.0020). Most East and South Asian countries have a TGC score of 1, and most sub-Saharan African countries have a TGC score less than 1. This signifies that Asian countries lead world frontier technology and most African countries do not. The decomposition of efficiency scores showed that with regard to technical changes, African nations had progressed on average only 0.01%, and efficiency change scores had regressed by 0.59% annually. Significance: • First efficiency study on microfinance institutions and their heterogeneity in Africa. • The results show robust discrimination among the efficiency scores. Academy of Science of South Africa 2016 Article PeerReviewed Azad, M.A.K. and Munisamy, S. and Masum, A.K.M. and Wanke, P. (2016) Do African microfinance institutions need efficiency for financial stability and social outreach? South African Journal of Science, 112 (9-10). p. 20150474. ISSN 0038-2353, DOI https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150474 <https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150474>. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/20150474 doi:10.17159/sajs.2016/20150474 |
| spellingShingle | HF Commerce HG Finance Azad, M.A.K. Munisamy, S. Masum, A.K.M. Wanke, P. Do African microfinance institutions need efficiency for financial stability and social outreach? |
| title | Do African microfinance institutions need efficiency for financial stability and social outreach? |
| title_full | Do African microfinance institutions need efficiency for financial stability and social outreach? |
| title_fullStr | Do African microfinance institutions need efficiency for financial stability and social outreach? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Do African microfinance institutions need efficiency for financial stability and social outreach? |
| title_short | Do African microfinance institutions need efficiency for financial stability and social outreach? |
| title_sort | do african microfinance institutions need efficiency for financial stability and social outreach |
| topic | HF Commerce HG Finance |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT azadmak doafricanmicrofinanceinstitutionsneedefficiencyforfinancialstabilityandsocialoutreach AT munisamys doafricanmicrofinanceinstitutionsneedefficiencyforfinancialstabilityandsocialoutreach AT masumakm doafricanmicrofinanceinstitutionsneedefficiencyforfinancialstabilityandsocialoutreach AT wankep doafricanmicrofinanceinstitutionsneedefficiencyforfinancialstabilityandsocialoutreach |