Transitional justice and peacebuilding in Africa: Nexus or nemesis? / Muhammad Danial Azman

In what way have liberal peacebuilding interacted with the mechanisms commonly associated with Transitional Justice (TJ), and how has this enriched the debate of liberal peace and democracy in Africa? In two parts, this article briefly elucidates the intersection between Transitional Justice (TJ) an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Azman, M. D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Department of International and Strategic Studies 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/18525/1/Azman_2014.pdf
_version_ 1825721127960313856
author Azman, M. D.
author_facet Azman, M. D.
author_sort Azman, M. D.
collection UM
description In what way have liberal peacebuilding interacted with the mechanisms commonly associated with Transitional Justice (TJ), and how has this enriched the debate of liberal peace and democracy in Africa? In two parts, this article briefly elucidates the intersection between Transitional Justice (TJ) and liberal peacebuilding. The first part begins by revising Oliver Richmond’s four generations of practices in peacebuilding. A particular emphasis will be placed here on the fourth, the most contemporary framework for liberal peacebuilding, and the major criticisms that it has received in Africa. The second part acknowledges the sustained criticism of liberal peace in Africa, which is key to understanding the growing relevance of the ‘justice versus peace' debate in two specific forms of post-conflict reconstruction experiments in Africa. Two are: (i) transformation from peacekeeping to peacebuilding; (ii) a paradigm shift from the normative, liberal peace conviction that justice is a good project, to a legal, consequentialist argument that peace cannot be lastingly sustained without some form of criminal prosecution, resulting the increasing usage of human rights language in drafting peace agreements. The aims is to highlight the deeper affinity and deficiency that can be viewed as two sides of the same coin in the liberal cosmopolitan approach to post-Cold War International Relations (IR): peacebuilding as a political project concerned with sustainable peace, and TJ as a legal project that concerns itself with evaluating the modes of justice during the transitional phase.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T05:45:39Z
format Article
id um.eprints-18525
institution Universiti Malaya
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T05:45:39Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Department of International and Strategic Studies
record_format dspace
spelling um.eprints-185252018-02-12T02:18:37Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/18525/ Transitional justice and peacebuilding in Africa: Nexus or nemesis? / Muhammad Danial Azman Azman, M. D. DT Africa JA Political science (General) JX International law JZ International relations In what way have liberal peacebuilding interacted with the mechanisms commonly associated with Transitional Justice (TJ), and how has this enriched the debate of liberal peace and democracy in Africa? In two parts, this article briefly elucidates the intersection between Transitional Justice (TJ) and liberal peacebuilding. The first part begins by revising Oliver Richmond’s four generations of practices in peacebuilding. A particular emphasis will be placed here on the fourth, the most contemporary framework for liberal peacebuilding, and the major criticisms that it has received in Africa. The second part acknowledges the sustained criticism of liberal peace in Africa, which is key to understanding the growing relevance of the ‘justice versus peace' debate in two specific forms of post-conflict reconstruction experiments in Africa. Two are: (i) transformation from peacekeeping to peacebuilding; (ii) a paradigm shift from the normative, liberal peace conviction that justice is a good project, to a legal, consequentialist argument that peace cannot be lastingly sustained without some form of criminal prosecution, resulting the increasing usage of human rights language in drafting peace agreements. The aims is to highlight the deeper affinity and deficiency that can be viewed as two sides of the same coin in the liberal cosmopolitan approach to post-Cold War International Relations (IR): peacebuilding as a political project concerned with sustainable peace, and TJ as a legal project that concerns itself with evaluating the modes of justice during the transitional phase. Department of International and Strategic Studies 2014-12-25 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc_by_nd http://eprints.um.edu.my/18525/1/Azman_2014.pdf Azman, M. D. (2014) Transitional justice and peacebuilding in Africa: Nexus or nemesis? / Muhammad Danial Azman. Malaysian Journal of International Relations, 2. pp. 23-42. ISSN 2289-5043 (Print); 2600-8181 (electronic), https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/mjir/article/view/3196
spellingShingle DT Africa
JA Political science (General)
JX International law
JZ International relations
Azman, M. D.
Transitional justice and peacebuilding in Africa: Nexus or nemesis? / Muhammad Danial Azman
title Transitional justice and peacebuilding in Africa: Nexus or nemesis? / Muhammad Danial Azman
title_full Transitional justice and peacebuilding in Africa: Nexus or nemesis? / Muhammad Danial Azman
title_fullStr Transitional justice and peacebuilding in Africa: Nexus or nemesis? / Muhammad Danial Azman
title_full_unstemmed Transitional justice and peacebuilding in Africa: Nexus or nemesis? / Muhammad Danial Azman
title_short Transitional justice and peacebuilding in Africa: Nexus or nemesis? / Muhammad Danial Azman
title_sort transitional justice and peacebuilding in africa nexus or nemesis muhammad danial azman
topic DT Africa
JA Political science (General)
JX International law
JZ International relations
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/18525/1/Azman_2014.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT azmanmd transitionaljusticeandpeacebuildinginafricanexusornemesismuhammaddanialazman