Different slaughtering techniques and possible physiological and biomolecular effects

The aim of the study was to identify possible physiological and biomolecular changes during slaughtering. For slaughtering, before the neck cutting, chickens are immobilized manually or immobilized using shackles. Neck cutting is generally performed using automated knife, often results in decapitati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zaman, R., Shahdan, I.A., Idid, S.Z., Abdurazaq, N.B., Rahman, M.T.
Format: Article
Published: Malaysian Society of Applied Biology 2017
Subjects:
_version_ 1825721182939250688
author Zaman, R.
Shahdan, I.A.
Idid, S.Z.
Abdurazaq, N.B.
Rahman, M.T.
author_facet Zaman, R.
Shahdan, I.A.
Idid, S.Z.
Abdurazaq, N.B.
Rahman, M.T.
author_sort Zaman, R.
collection UM
description The aim of the study was to identify possible physiological and biomolecular changes during slaughtering. For slaughtering, before the neck cutting, chickens are immobilized manually or immobilized using shackles. Neck cutting is generally performed using automated knife, often results in decapitation. Both of these immobilization and neck cutting conditions are expected to influence muscle contraction and blood loss. We have investigated the activity and transcription of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) which terminates cholinergic synaptic transmission by hydrolysing the neurotransmitter acetylcholine that is responsible for muscle contraction and relaxation. We have also analysed the residual haemoglobin content of the skeletal muscle as indicator of blood loss. Skeletal muscle sample was collected from the chickens that were slaughtered either by decapitation (C) or by severance of the jugular veins, carotid arteries, oesophagus and trachea only (P); whilst immediately after slaughtering, chickens were either released (R) or manually constrained (T). Differences in the conditions of slaughtering: CR, PR or PT did not affect blood loss as measured by the residual Hb content and the amount of Zn and Fe either in muscle or liver, deducing no significant difference (p>0.05) in blood loss due to different type of slaughtering. No significant differences (p>0.05) were observed in AChE activity in muscles taken from all slaughter groups. However, AChE transcripts were detected in muscles from chickens from PT and CR groups which might be due to the decapitation and/or constrained muscular activity after neck cutting. Hence the results of the current study indicate that, constraining during slaughtering and decapitation might induce stress to the animals.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T05:46:29Z
format Article
id um.eprints-18835
institution Universiti Malaya
last_indexed 2024-03-06T05:46:29Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Malaysian Society of Applied Biology
record_format dspace
spelling um.eprints-188352018-06-07T07:50:46Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/18835/ Different slaughtering techniques and possible physiological and biomolecular effects Zaman, R. Shahdan, I.A. Idid, S.Z. Abdurazaq, N.B. Rahman, M.T. RK Dentistry The aim of the study was to identify possible physiological and biomolecular changes during slaughtering. For slaughtering, before the neck cutting, chickens are immobilized manually or immobilized using shackles. Neck cutting is generally performed using automated knife, often results in decapitation. Both of these immobilization and neck cutting conditions are expected to influence muscle contraction and blood loss. We have investigated the activity and transcription of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) which terminates cholinergic synaptic transmission by hydrolysing the neurotransmitter acetylcholine that is responsible for muscle contraction and relaxation. We have also analysed the residual haemoglobin content of the skeletal muscle as indicator of blood loss. Skeletal muscle sample was collected from the chickens that were slaughtered either by decapitation (C) or by severance of the jugular veins, carotid arteries, oesophagus and trachea only (P); whilst immediately after slaughtering, chickens were either released (R) or manually constrained (T). Differences in the conditions of slaughtering: CR, PR or PT did not affect blood loss as measured by the residual Hb content and the amount of Zn and Fe either in muscle or liver, deducing no significant difference (p>0.05) in blood loss due to different type of slaughtering. No significant differences (p>0.05) were observed in AChE activity in muscles taken from all slaughter groups. However, AChE transcripts were detected in muscles from chickens from PT and CR groups which might be due to the decapitation and/or constrained muscular activity after neck cutting. Hence the results of the current study indicate that, constraining during slaughtering and decapitation might induce stress to the animals. Malaysian Society of Applied Biology 2017 Article PeerReviewed Zaman, R. and Shahdan, I.A. and Idid, S.Z. and Abdurazaq, N.B. and Rahman, M.T. (2017) Different slaughtering techniques and possible physiological and biomolecular effects. Malaysian Applied Biology, 46 (4). pp. 103-109. ISSN 0126-8643, http://www.mabjournal.com/images/46_4_December_2017/46_04_12.pdf
spellingShingle RK Dentistry
Zaman, R.
Shahdan, I.A.
Idid, S.Z.
Abdurazaq, N.B.
Rahman, M.T.
Different slaughtering techniques and possible physiological and biomolecular effects
title Different slaughtering techniques and possible physiological and biomolecular effects
title_full Different slaughtering techniques and possible physiological and biomolecular effects
title_fullStr Different slaughtering techniques and possible physiological and biomolecular effects
title_full_unstemmed Different slaughtering techniques and possible physiological and biomolecular effects
title_short Different slaughtering techniques and possible physiological and biomolecular effects
title_sort different slaughtering techniques and possible physiological and biomolecular effects
topic RK Dentistry
work_keys_str_mv AT zamanr differentslaughteringtechniquesandpossiblephysiologicalandbiomoleculareffects
AT shahdania differentslaughteringtechniquesandpossiblephysiologicalandbiomoleculareffects
AT ididsz differentslaughteringtechniquesandpossiblephysiologicalandbiomoleculareffects
AT abdurazaqnb differentslaughteringtechniquesandpossiblephysiologicalandbiomoleculareffects
AT rahmanmt differentslaughteringtechniquesandpossiblephysiologicalandbiomoleculareffects