Biomechanical comparison between cortical screw-rod construct versus pedicle screw-rod construct in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
OBJECTIVE: To compare construct stiffness of cortical screw (CS)-rod transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) construct (G2) versus pedicle screw (PS)-rod TLIF construct (G1) in the standardized porcine lumbar spine. METHODS: Six porcine lumbar spines (L2-L5) were separated into 12 functiona...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
SAGE Publications (UK and US)
2017
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1796960579066265600 |
|---|---|
| author | Chan, C.Y.W. Sem, S.W. Bashir, E.S. Saw, L.B. Shanmugam, R. Kwan, M.K. |
| author_facet | Chan, C.Y.W. Sem, S.W. Bashir, E.S. Saw, L.B. Shanmugam, R. Kwan, M.K. |
| author_sort | Chan, C.Y.W. |
| collection | UM |
| description | OBJECTIVE: To compare construct stiffness of cortical screw (CS)-rod transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) construct (G2) versus pedicle screw (PS)-rod TLIF construct (G1) in the standardized porcine lumbar spine.
METHODS: Six porcine lumbar spines (L2-L5) were separated into 12 functional spine units. Bilateral total facetectomies and interlaminar decompression were performed for all specimens. Non-destructive loading to assess stiffness in lateral bending, flexion and extension as well as axial rotation was performed using a universal material testing machine.
RESULTS: PS and CS constructs were significantly stiffer than the intact spine except in axial rotation. Using the normalized ratio to the intact spine, there is no significant difference between the stiffness of PS and CS: flexion (1.41 ± 0.27, 1.55 ± 0.32), extension (1.98 ± 0.49, 2.25 ± 0.44), right lateral flexion (1.93 ± 0.57, 1.55 ± 0.30), left lateral flexion (2.00 ± 0.73, 2.16 ± 0.20), right axial rotation (0.99 ± 0.21, 0.83 ± 0.26) and left axial rotation (0.96 ± 0.22, 0.92 ± 0.25).
CONCLUSION: The CS-rod TLIF construct provided comparable construct stiffness to a traditional PS-rod TLIF construct in a 'standardized' porcine lumbar spine model. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T05:46:44Z |
| format | Article |
| id | um.eprints-18923 |
| institution | Universiti Malaya |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T05:46:44Z |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publisher | SAGE Publications (UK and US) |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | um.eprints-189232018-07-27T01:18:23Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/18923/ Biomechanical comparison between cortical screw-rod construct versus pedicle screw-rod construct in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Chan, C.Y.W. Sem, S.W. Bashir, E.S. Saw, L.B. Shanmugam, R. Kwan, M.K. R Medicine OBJECTIVE: To compare construct stiffness of cortical screw (CS)-rod transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) construct (G2) versus pedicle screw (PS)-rod TLIF construct (G1) in the standardized porcine lumbar spine. METHODS: Six porcine lumbar spines (L2-L5) were separated into 12 functional spine units. Bilateral total facetectomies and interlaminar decompression were performed for all specimens. Non-destructive loading to assess stiffness in lateral bending, flexion and extension as well as axial rotation was performed using a universal material testing machine. RESULTS: PS and CS constructs were significantly stiffer than the intact spine except in axial rotation. Using the normalized ratio to the intact spine, there is no significant difference between the stiffness of PS and CS: flexion (1.41 ± 0.27, 1.55 ± 0.32), extension (1.98 ± 0.49, 2.25 ± 0.44), right lateral flexion (1.93 ± 0.57, 1.55 ± 0.30), left lateral flexion (2.00 ± 0.73, 2.16 ± 0.20), right axial rotation (0.99 ± 0.21, 0.83 ± 0.26) and left axial rotation (0.96 ± 0.22, 0.92 ± 0.25). CONCLUSION: The CS-rod TLIF construct provided comparable construct stiffness to a traditional PS-rod TLIF construct in a 'standardized' porcine lumbar spine model. SAGE Publications (UK and US) 2017 Article PeerReviewed Chan, C.Y.W. and Sem, S.W. and Bashir, E.S. and Saw, L.B. and Shanmugam, R. and Kwan, M.K. (2017) Biomechanical comparison between cortical screw-rod construct versus pedicle screw-rod construct in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 25 (1). pp. 1-8. ISSN 2309-4990, DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017690656 <https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017690656>. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2309499017690656 doi:10.1177/2309499017690656 |
| spellingShingle | R Medicine Chan, C.Y.W. Sem, S.W. Bashir, E.S. Saw, L.B. Shanmugam, R. Kwan, M.K. Biomechanical comparison between cortical screw-rod construct versus pedicle screw-rod construct in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion |
| title | Biomechanical comparison between cortical screw-rod construct versus pedicle screw-rod construct in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion |
| title_full | Biomechanical comparison between cortical screw-rod construct versus pedicle screw-rod construct in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion |
| title_fullStr | Biomechanical comparison between cortical screw-rod construct versus pedicle screw-rod construct in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion |
| title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical comparison between cortical screw-rod construct versus pedicle screw-rod construct in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion |
| title_short | Biomechanical comparison between cortical screw-rod construct versus pedicle screw-rod construct in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion |
| title_sort | biomechanical comparison between cortical screw rod construct versus pedicle screw rod construct in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion |
| topic | R Medicine |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chancyw biomechanicalcomparisonbetweencorticalscrewrodconstructversuspediclescrewrodconstructintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT semsw biomechanicalcomparisonbetweencorticalscrewrodconstructversuspediclescrewrodconstructintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT bashires biomechanicalcomparisonbetweencorticalscrewrodconstructversuspediclescrewrodconstructintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT sawlb biomechanicalcomparisonbetweencorticalscrewrodconstructversuspediclescrewrodconstructintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT shanmugamr biomechanicalcomparisonbetweencorticalscrewrodconstructversuspediclescrewrodconstructintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion AT kwanmk biomechanicalcomparisonbetweencorticalscrewrodconstructversuspediclescrewrodconstructintransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion |