Benchmarking working conditions for health and safety in the frontline healthcare industry: Perspectives from Australia and Malaysia

Aim: To present benchmarks for working conditions in healthcare industries as an initial effort into international surveillance. Background: The healthcare industry is fundamental to sustaining the health of Australians, yet it is under immense pressure. Budgets are limited, demands are increasing a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McLinton, Sarven Savia, Loh, May Young, Dollard, Maureen Frances, Tuckey, Michelle M.R., Idris, Mohd Awang, Morton, Sharon
Format: Article
Published: Wiley 2018
Subjects:
_version_ 1796961406354980864
author McLinton, Sarven Savia
Loh, May Young
Dollard, Maureen Frances
Tuckey, Michelle M.R.
Idris, Mohd Awang
Morton, Sharon
author_facet McLinton, Sarven Savia
Loh, May Young
Dollard, Maureen Frances
Tuckey, Michelle M.R.
Idris, Mohd Awang
Morton, Sharon
author_sort McLinton, Sarven Savia
collection UM
description Aim: To present benchmarks for working conditions in healthcare industries as an initial effort into international surveillance. Background: The healthcare industry is fundamental to sustaining the health of Australians, yet it is under immense pressure. Budgets are limited, demands are increasing as are workplace injuries and all of these factors compromise patient care. Urgent attention is needed to reduce strains on workers and costs in health care, however, little work has been done to benchmark psychosocial factors in healthcare working conditions in the Asia-Pacific. Intercultural comparisons are important to provide an evidence base for public policy. Design: A cross-sectional design was used (like other studies of prevalence), including a mixed-methods approach with qualitative interviews to better contextualize the results. Methods: Data on psychosocial factors and other work variables were collected from healthcare workers in three hospitals in Australia (N = 1,258) and Malaysia (N = 1,125). 2015 benchmarks were calculated for each variable and comparison was conducted via independent samples t tests. Healthcare samples were also compared with benchmarks for non-healthcare general working populations from their respective countries: Australia (N = 973) and Malaysia (N = 225). Findings: Our study benchmarks healthcare working conditions in Australia and Malaysia against the general working population, identifying trends that indicate the industry is in need of intervention strategies and job redesign initiatives that better support psychological health and safety. Conclusion: We move toward a better understanding of the precursors of psychosocial safety climate in a broader context, including similarities and differences between Australia and Malaysia in national culture, government occupational health and safety policies and top-level management practices.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T05:53:46Z
format Article
id um.eprints-21306
institution Universiti Malaya
last_indexed 2024-03-06T05:53:46Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling um.eprints-213062019-05-27T02:37:06Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/21306/ Benchmarking working conditions for health and safety in the frontline healthcare industry: Perspectives from Australia and Malaysia McLinton, Sarven Savia Loh, May Young Dollard, Maureen Frances Tuckey, Michelle M.R. Idris, Mohd Awang Morton, Sharon GN Anthropology HM Sociology Aim: To present benchmarks for working conditions in healthcare industries as an initial effort into international surveillance. Background: The healthcare industry is fundamental to sustaining the health of Australians, yet it is under immense pressure. Budgets are limited, demands are increasing as are workplace injuries and all of these factors compromise patient care. Urgent attention is needed to reduce strains on workers and costs in health care, however, little work has been done to benchmark psychosocial factors in healthcare working conditions in the Asia-Pacific. Intercultural comparisons are important to provide an evidence base for public policy. Design: A cross-sectional design was used (like other studies of prevalence), including a mixed-methods approach with qualitative interviews to better contextualize the results. Methods: Data on psychosocial factors and other work variables were collected from healthcare workers in three hospitals in Australia (N = 1,258) and Malaysia (N = 1,125). 2015 benchmarks were calculated for each variable and comparison was conducted via independent samples t tests. Healthcare samples were also compared with benchmarks for non-healthcare general working populations from their respective countries: Australia (N = 973) and Malaysia (N = 225). Findings: Our study benchmarks healthcare working conditions in Australia and Malaysia against the general working population, identifying trends that indicate the industry is in need of intervention strategies and job redesign initiatives that better support psychological health and safety. Conclusion: We move toward a better understanding of the precursors of psychosocial safety climate in a broader context, including similarities and differences between Australia and Malaysia in national culture, government occupational health and safety policies and top-level management practices. Wiley 2018 Article PeerReviewed McLinton, Sarven Savia and Loh, May Young and Dollard, Maureen Frances and Tuckey, Michelle M.R. and Idris, Mohd Awang and Morton, Sharon (2018) Benchmarking working conditions for health and safety in the frontline healthcare industry: Perspectives from Australia and Malaysia. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74 (8). pp. 1851-1862. ISSN 0309-2402, DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13580 <https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13580>. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13580 doi:10.1111/jan.13580
spellingShingle GN Anthropology
HM Sociology
McLinton, Sarven Savia
Loh, May Young
Dollard, Maureen Frances
Tuckey, Michelle M.R.
Idris, Mohd Awang
Morton, Sharon
Benchmarking working conditions for health and safety in the frontline healthcare industry: Perspectives from Australia and Malaysia
title Benchmarking working conditions for health and safety in the frontline healthcare industry: Perspectives from Australia and Malaysia
title_full Benchmarking working conditions for health and safety in the frontline healthcare industry: Perspectives from Australia and Malaysia
title_fullStr Benchmarking working conditions for health and safety in the frontline healthcare industry: Perspectives from Australia and Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Benchmarking working conditions for health and safety in the frontline healthcare industry: Perspectives from Australia and Malaysia
title_short Benchmarking working conditions for health and safety in the frontline healthcare industry: Perspectives from Australia and Malaysia
title_sort benchmarking working conditions for health and safety in the frontline healthcare industry perspectives from australia and malaysia
topic GN Anthropology
HM Sociology
work_keys_str_mv AT mclintonsarvensavia benchmarkingworkingconditionsforhealthandsafetyinthefrontlinehealthcareindustryperspectivesfromaustraliaandmalaysia
AT lohmayyoung benchmarkingworkingconditionsforhealthandsafetyinthefrontlinehealthcareindustryperspectivesfromaustraliaandmalaysia
AT dollardmaureenfrances benchmarkingworkingconditionsforhealthandsafetyinthefrontlinehealthcareindustryperspectivesfromaustraliaandmalaysia
AT tuckeymichellemr benchmarkingworkingconditionsforhealthandsafetyinthefrontlinehealthcareindustryperspectivesfromaustraliaandmalaysia
AT idrismohdawang benchmarkingworkingconditionsforhealthandsafetyinthefrontlinehealthcareindustryperspectivesfromaustraliaandmalaysia
AT mortonsharon benchmarkingworkingconditionsforhealthandsafetyinthefrontlinehealthcareindustryperspectivesfromaustraliaandmalaysia