Long-Term Nasogastric Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding in Older Asians With Dysphagia: A Pragmatic Study

Background: A barrier to gastrostomy feeding exists among Asian clinicians and caregivers due to negative perceptions regarding complications. We compared clinical and nutrition outcomes in older dysphagic Asian patients with nasogastric (NG) or gastrostomy tube feeding using a pragmatic study desig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaafar, Mohamad Hasif, Mahadeva, Sanjiv, Tan, Kit Mun, Chin, Ai-Vyrn, Kamaruzzaman, Shahrul Bahyah, Khor, Hui Min, Saedon, Nor 'Izzati, Tan, Maw Pin
Format: Article
Published: Wiley 2018
Subjects:
_version_ 1796961954259009536
author Jaafar, Mohamad Hasif
Mahadeva, Sanjiv
Tan, Kit Mun
Chin, Ai-Vyrn
Kamaruzzaman, Shahrul Bahyah
Khor, Hui Min
Saedon, Nor 'Izzati
Tan, Maw Pin
author_facet Jaafar, Mohamad Hasif
Mahadeva, Sanjiv
Tan, Kit Mun
Chin, Ai-Vyrn
Kamaruzzaman, Shahrul Bahyah
Khor, Hui Min
Saedon, Nor 'Izzati
Tan, Maw Pin
author_sort Jaafar, Mohamad Hasif
collection UM
description Background: A barrier to gastrostomy feeding exists among Asian clinicians and caregivers due to negative perceptions regarding complications. We compared clinical and nutrition outcomes in older dysphagic Asian patients with nasogastric (NG) or gastrostomy tube feeding using a pragmatic study design. Methods: The choice of enteral tube access was determined by managing clinicians and patients/caregivers. Comparisons of tube feeding methods were made during a 4-month period, adjusting statistically for inherent confounders. Results: A total of 102 participants (NG: n = 52, gastrostomy: n = 50) were recruited over 2 years from 2013 to 2015. Subjects on long-term NG tube feeding were older (82.67 ± 7.15 years vs 76.88 ± 7.37 years; P <.001) but both groups had similar clinical indications (stroke: 63.5% NG vs 54% gastrostomy; P =.33). After adjustment for confounders, gastrostomy feeding was associated with fewer tube-related complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06–0.60) and better complication-free survival rate (aOR = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.12–0.89) at 4-month follow-up. Anthropometric and biochemical nutrition parameters improved significantly in both groups at 4 months, but no significant differences were observed at the end of the study. Conclusion: Gastrostomy feeding is associated with a greater 4-month complication-free survival and lower tube-related complications compared with long-term NG feeding in older Asians with dysphagia. However, no differences in nutrition outcomes were observed between NG and gastrostomy feeding at 4 months. © 2018 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
first_indexed 2024-03-06T06:01:49Z
format Article
id um.eprints-24106
institution Universiti Malaya
last_indexed 2024-03-06T06:01:49Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling um.eprints-241062020-03-26T05:21:54Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/24106/ Long-Term Nasogastric Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding in Older Asians With Dysphagia: A Pragmatic Study Jaafar, Mohamad Hasif Mahadeva, Sanjiv Tan, Kit Mun Chin, Ai-Vyrn Kamaruzzaman, Shahrul Bahyah Khor, Hui Min Saedon, Nor 'Izzati Tan, Maw Pin R Medicine Background: A barrier to gastrostomy feeding exists among Asian clinicians and caregivers due to negative perceptions regarding complications. We compared clinical and nutrition outcomes in older dysphagic Asian patients with nasogastric (NG) or gastrostomy tube feeding using a pragmatic study design. Methods: The choice of enteral tube access was determined by managing clinicians and patients/caregivers. Comparisons of tube feeding methods were made during a 4-month period, adjusting statistically for inherent confounders. Results: A total of 102 participants (NG: n = 52, gastrostomy: n = 50) were recruited over 2 years from 2013 to 2015. Subjects on long-term NG tube feeding were older (82.67 ± 7.15 years vs 76.88 ± 7.37 years; P <.001) but both groups had similar clinical indications (stroke: 63.5% NG vs 54% gastrostomy; P =.33). After adjustment for confounders, gastrostomy feeding was associated with fewer tube-related complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.06–0.60) and better complication-free survival rate (aOR = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.12–0.89) at 4-month follow-up. Anthropometric and biochemical nutrition parameters improved significantly in both groups at 4 months, but no significant differences were observed at the end of the study. Conclusion: Gastrostomy feeding is associated with a greater 4-month complication-free survival and lower tube-related complications compared with long-term NG feeding in older Asians with dysphagia. However, no differences in nutrition outcomes were observed between NG and gastrostomy feeding at 4 months. © 2018 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Wiley 2018 Article PeerReviewed Jaafar, Mohamad Hasif and Mahadeva, Sanjiv and Tan, Kit Mun and Chin, Ai-Vyrn and Kamaruzzaman, Shahrul Bahyah and Khor, Hui Min and Saedon, Nor 'Izzati and Tan, Maw Pin (2018) Long-Term Nasogastric Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding in Older Asians With Dysphagia: A Pragmatic Study. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 34 (2). pp. 280-289. ISSN 0884-5336, DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10195 <https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10195>. https://doi.org/10.1002/ncp.10195 doi:10.1002/ncp.10195
spellingShingle R Medicine
Jaafar, Mohamad Hasif
Mahadeva, Sanjiv
Tan, Kit Mun
Chin, Ai-Vyrn
Kamaruzzaman, Shahrul Bahyah
Khor, Hui Min
Saedon, Nor 'Izzati
Tan, Maw Pin
Long-Term Nasogastric Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding in Older Asians With Dysphagia: A Pragmatic Study
title Long-Term Nasogastric Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding in Older Asians With Dysphagia: A Pragmatic Study
title_full Long-Term Nasogastric Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding in Older Asians With Dysphagia: A Pragmatic Study
title_fullStr Long-Term Nasogastric Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding in Older Asians With Dysphagia: A Pragmatic Study
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Nasogastric Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding in Older Asians With Dysphagia: A Pragmatic Study
title_short Long-Term Nasogastric Versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Feeding in Older Asians With Dysphagia: A Pragmatic Study
title_sort long term nasogastric versus percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube feeding in older asians with dysphagia a pragmatic study
topic R Medicine
work_keys_str_mv AT jaafarmohamadhasif longtermnasogastricversuspercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomytubefeedinginolderasianswithdysphagiaapragmaticstudy
AT mahadevasanjiv longtermnasogastricversuspercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomytubefeedinginolderasianswithdysphagiaapragmaticstudy
AT tankitmun longtermnasogastricversuspercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomytubefeedinginolderasianswithdysphagiaapragmaticstudy
AT chinaivyrn longtermnasogastricversuspercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomytubefeedinginolderasianswithdysphagiaapragmaticstudy
AT kamaruzzamanshahrulbahyah longtermnasogastricversuspercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomytubefeedinginolderasianswithdysphagiaapragmaticstudy
AT khorhuimin longtermnasogastricversuspercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomytubefeedinginolderasianswithdysphagiaapragmaticstudy
AT saedonnorizzati longtermnasogastricversuspercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomytubefeedinginolderasianswithdysphagiaapragmaticstudy
AT tanmawpin longtermnasogastricversuspercutaneousendoscopicgastrostomytubefeedinginolderasianswithdysphagiaapragmaticstudy