Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology)
Recent clinical trials have raised concerns about the safety and efficacy of ABSORB™ bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS). The difference in the vascular healing process between SYNERGY™ bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) and BVS remains unclear. The aim of the ENHANCE...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer Verlag
2020
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1825722309807177728 |
|---|---|
| author | Wan Ahmad, Wan Azman Nakayoshi, Takaharu Mahmood Zuhdi, Ahmad Syadi Ismail, Muhammad Dzafir Abidin, Imran Zainal Ino, Yasushi Kubo, Takashi Akasaka, Takashi Fukumoto, Yoshihiro Ueno, Takafumi |
| author_facet | Wan Ahmad, Wan Azman Nakayoshi, Takaharu Mahmood Zuhdi, Ahmad Syadi Ismail, Muhammad Dzafir Abidin, Imran Zainal Ino, Yasushi Kubo, Takashi Akasaka, Takashi Fukumoto, Yoshihiro Ueno, Takafumi |
| author_sort | Wan Ahmad, Wan Azman |
| collection | UM |
| description | Recent clinical trials have raised concerns about the safety and efficacy of ABSORB™ bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS). The difference in the vascular healing process between SYNERGY™ bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) and BVS remains unclear. The aim of the ENHANCE study was to compare vascular healing on BP-EES versus BVS by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy (CAS) at 4- and 12-month follow-ups. This is a prospective, non-randomized, single center clinical trial. Thirteen eligible patients with multivessel disease were enrolled. BP-EES and BVS were simultaneously implanted in the same patients, but in different coronary vessels. Imaging follow-up with both OCT and CAS was completed in 11 patients at 12 months. Neointimal coverage rates were similar between the two groups based on OCT measurements. The neointimal thickness of BP-EES was significantly thicker at the 12th month than at the 4th month, whereas the neointimal thickness of BVS did not change between the measurements taken at the 4th and 12th month. Existence of intra-stent thrombus was significantly higher in the BVS group, compared to the BP-EES group. On the other hand, CAS revealed that red-thrombi and yellow-plaque were more frequently observed in BVS at 4 months and up to 12-month follow-ups than in BP-EES. These findings suggested that the evidence of instability remained up to 12 months in the vascular healing with BVS, compared to that with BP-EES. Vascular healing of the stented wall was recognized at the very early phase after BP-EES implantation. However, vascular healing with BVS was still incomplete after 12 months. © 2019, The Author(s). |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T06:03:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | um.eprints-24771 |
| institution | Universiti Malaya |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T06:03:43Z |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publisher | Springer Verlag |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | um.eprints-247712020-06-10T08:08:02Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/24771/ Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology) Wan Ahmad, Wan Azman Nakayoshi, Takaharu Mahmood Zuhdi, Ahmad Syadi Ismail, Muhammad Dzafir Abidin, Imran Zainal Ino, Yasushi Kubo, Takashi Akasaka, Takashi Fukumoto, Yoshihiro Ueno, Takafumi R Medicine Recent clinical trials have raised concerns about the safety and efficacy of ABSORB™ bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS). The difference in the vascular healing process between SYNERGY™ bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) and BVS remains unclear. The aim of the ENHANCE study was to compare vascular healing on BP-EES versus BVS by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and coronary angioscopy (CAS) at 4- and 12-month follow-ups. This is a prospective, non-randomized, single center clinical trial. Thirteen eligible patients with multivessel disease were enrolled. BP-EES and BVS were simultaneously implanted in the same patients, but in different coronary vessels. Imaging follow-up with both OCT and CAS was completed in 11 patients at 12 months. Neointimal coverage rates were similar between the two groups based on OCT measurements. The neointimal thickness of BP-EES was significantly thicker at the 12th month than at the 4th month, whereas the neointimal thickness of BVS did not change between the measurements taken at the 4th and 12th month. Existence of intra-stent thrombus was significantly higher in the BVS group, compared to the BP-EES group. On the other hand, CAS revealed that red-thrombi and yellow-plaque were more frequently observed in BVS at 4 months and up to 12-month follow-ups than in BP-EES. These findings suggested that the evidence of instability remained up to 12 months in the vascular healing with BVS, compared to that with BP-EES. Vascular healing of the stented wall was recognized at the very early phase after BP-EES implantation. However, vascular healing with BVS was still incomplete after 12 months. © 2019, The Author(s). Springer Verlag 2020 Article PeerReviewed Wan Ahmad, Wan Azman and Nakayoshi, Takaharu and Mahmood Zuhdi, Ahmad Syadi and Ismail, Muhammad Dzafir and Abidin, Imran Zainal and Ino, Yasushi and Kubo, Takashi and Akasaka, Takashi and Fukumoto, Yoshihiro and Ueno, Takafumi (2020) Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology). Heart and Vessels, 35 (4). pp. 463-473. ISSN 0910-8327, DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01516-9 <https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01516-9>. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-019-01516-9 doi:10.1007/s00380-019-01516-9 |
| spellingShingle | R Medicine Wan Ahmad, Wan Azman Nakayoshi, Takaharu Mahmood Zuhdi, Ahmad Syadi Ismail, Muhammad Dzafir Abidin, Imran Zainal Ino, Yasushi Kubo, Takashi Akasaka, Takashi Fukumoto, Yoshihiro Ueno, Takafumi Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology) |
| title | Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology) |
| title_full | Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology) |
| title_fullStr | Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology) |
| title_short | Different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy (the ENHANCE study: ENdothelial Healing Assessment with Novel Coronary tEchnology) |
| title_sort | different vascular healing process between bioabsorbable polymer coated everolimus eluting stents versus bioresorbable vascular scaffolds via optical coherence tomography and coronary angioscopy the enhance study endothelial healing assessment with novel coronary technology |
| topic | R Medicine |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT wanahmadwanazman differentvascularhealingprocessbetweenbioabsorbablepolymercoatedeverolimuselutingstentsversusbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsviaopticalcoherencetomographyandcoronaryangioscopytheenhancestudyendothelialhealingassessmentwithnovelcoronarytechnology AT nakayoshitakaharu differentvascularhealingprocessbetweenbioabsorbablepolymercoatedeverolimuselutingstentsversusbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsviaopticalcoherencetomographyandcoronaryangioscopytheenhancestudyendothelialhealingassessmentwithnovelcoronarytechnology AT mahmoodzuhdiahmadsyadi differentvascularhealingprocessbetweenbioabsorbablepolymercoatedeverolimuselutingstentsversusbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsviaopticalcoherencetomographyandcoronaryangioscopytheenhancestudyendothelialhealingassessmentwithnovelcoronarytechnology AT ismailmuhammaddzafir differentvascularhealingprocessbetweenbioabsorbablepolymercoatedeverolimuselutingstentsversusbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsviaopticalcoherencetomographyandcoronaryangioscopytheenhancestudyendothelialhealingassessmentwithnovelcoronarytechnology AT abidinimranzainal differentvascularhealingprocessbetweenbioabsorbablepolymercoatedeverolimuselutingstentsversusbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsviaopticalcoherencetomographyandcoronaryangioscopytheenhancestudyendothelialhealingassessmentwithnovelcoronarytechnology AT inoyasushi differentvascularhealingprocessbetweenbioabsorbablepolymercoatedeverolimuselutingstentsversusbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsviaopticalcoherencetomographyandcoronaryangioscopytheenhancestudyendothelialhealingassessmentwithnovelcoronarytechnology AT kubotakashi differentvascularhealingprocessbetweenbioabsorbablepolymercoatedeverolimuselutingstentsversusbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsviaopticalcoherencetomographyandcoronaryangioscopytheenhancestudyendothelialhealingassessmentwithnovelcoronarytechnology AT akasakatakashi differentvascularhealingprocessbetweenbioabsorbablepolymercoatedeverolimuselutingstentsversusbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsviaopticalcoherencetomographyandcoronaryangioscopytheenhancestudyendothelialhealingassessmentwithnovelcoronarytechnology AT fukumotoyoshihiro differentvascularhealingprocessbetweenbioabsorbablepolymercoatedeverolimuselutingstentsversusbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsviaopticalcoherencetomographyandcoronaryangioscopytheenhancestudyendothelialhealingassessmentwithnovelcoronarytechnology AT uenotakafumi differentvascularhealingprocessbetweenbioabsorbablepolymercoatedeverolimuselutingstentsversusbioresorbablevascularscaffoldsviaopticalcoherencetomographyandcoronaryangioscopytheenhancestudyendothelialhealingassessmentwithnovelcoronarytechnology |