Oral lichenoid reactions during antimalarial prophylaxis with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine combination

The prevalence of clinically observed oral lichenoid reaction in 186 Malay army personnel using Fansidar for 9 weeks was found to be 4.8. The prevalence was found to be 0.5 in 186 army personnel who had stopped using Fansidar for 2 months and 0 in 143 army personnel (control group) who had not used...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zain, R.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organisation 1989
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/2588/1/Oral_lichenoid_reactions_during_antimalarial_prophylaxis_with_sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine_combination.pdf
_version_ 1796944885126791168
author Zain, R.B.
author_facet Zain, R.B.
author_sort Zain, R.B.
collection UM
description The prevalence of clinically observed oral lichenoid reaction in 186 Malay army personnel using Fansidar for 9 weeks was found to be 4.8. The prevalence was found to be 0.5 in 186 army personnel who had stopped using Fansidar for 2 months and 0 in 143 army personnel (control group) who had not used Fansidar for at least 4 months. The lesion showed a higher prevalence for the gingiva. There was no correlation between cigarette smoking and the occurrence of these lesions in each group
first_indexed 2024-03-06T05:08:24Z
format Article
id um.eprints-2588
institution Universiti Malaya
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T05:08:24Z
publishDate 1989
publisher Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organisation
record_format dspace
spelling um.eprints-25882014-10-21T02:05:49Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/2588/ Oral lichenoid reactions during antimalarial prophylaxis with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine combination Zain, R.B. Oral surger The prevalence of clinically observed oral lichenoid reaction in 186 Malay army personnel using Fansidar for 9 weeks was found to be 4.8. The prevalence was found to be 0.5 in 186 army personnel who had stopped using Fansidar for 2 months and 0 in 143 army personnel (control group) who had not used Fansidar for at least 4 months. The lesion showed a higher prevalence for the gingiva. There was no correlation between cigarette smoking and the occurrence of these lesions in each group Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organisation 1989 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.um.edu.my/2588/1/Oral_lichenoid_reactions_during_antimalarial_prophylaxis_with_sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine_combination.pdf Zain, R.B. (1989) Oral lichenoid reactions during antimalarial prophylaxis with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine combination. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, 20 (2). pp. 253-256. ISSN 0038-3619,
spellingShingle Oral surger
Zain, R.B.
Oral lichenoid reactions during antimalarial prophylaxis with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine combination
title Oral lichenoid reactions during antimalarial prophylaxis with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine combination
title_full Oral lichenoid reactions during antimalarial prophylaxis with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine combination
title_fullStr Oral lichenoid reactions during antimalarial prophylaxis with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine combination
title_full_unstemmed Oral lichenoid reactions during antimalarial prophylaxis with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine combination
title_short Oral lichenoid reactions during antimalarial prophylaxis with sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine combination
title_sort oral lichenoid reactions during antimalarial prophylaxis with sulphadoxine pyrimethamine combination
topic Oral surger
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/2588/1/Oral_lichenoid_reactions_during_antimalarial_prophylaxis_with_sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine_combination.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT zainrb orallichenoidreactionsduringantimalarialprophylaxiswithsulphadoxinepyrimethaminecombination