Is the femoral neck geometry adequate for placement of the proximal femoral nail in the Malaysian population? A review of 100 cases

Issues that had been encountered during proximal femoral fracture fixation using proximal femoral nail include i) the adequacy of the femoral neck width in the local population and ii) the potential difficulty encountered during fixation in certain prefixed angles as determined by the implant. This...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chiu, Chee Kidd, Chan, Chris Yin Wei, Singh, Vivek Ajit
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Malaysian Medical Association 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/3595/1/is_the_femoral_neck_geometry_adequate_for_placement.pdf
_version_ 1825718826673635328
author Chiu, Chee Kidd
Chan, Chris Yin Wei
Singh, Vivek Ajit
author_facet Chiu, Chee Kidd
Chan, Chris Yin Wei
Singh, Vivek Ajit
author_sort Chiu, Chee Kidd
collection UM
description Issues that had been encountered during proximal femoral fracture fixation using proximal femoral nail include i) the adequacy of the femoral neck width in the local population and ii) the potential difficulty encountered during fixation in certain prefixed angles as determined by the implant. This was a retrospective, descriptive study evaluating the anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs of 100 consecutive patients, from January to August 2007, managed at University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur. The femoral neck width in the population studied was adequate for placement of femoral neck screw and anti-rotation pin or hip pin using the proximal femoral nail implant. (mean = 34.0±3.7mm, min = 24.6mm). There was no significant difference between the working area using an implant angled at 130° or 135° (P=0.91). Both femoral neck width and neck shaft angle of the Malaysian population studied were not a factor influencing the placement of femoral neck lag screws and anti-rotation pin.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T05:10:17Z
format Article
id um.eprints-3595
institution Universiti Malaya
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T05:10:17Z
publishDate 2009
publisher Malaysian Medical Association
record_format dspace
spelling um.eprints-35952020-07-13T07:35:49Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/3595/ Is the femoral neck geometry adequate for placement of the proximal femoral nail in the Malaysian population? A review of 100 cases Chiu, Chee Kidd Chan, Chris Yin Wei Singh, Vivek Ajit R Medicine Issues that had been encountered during proximal femoral fracture fixation using proximal femoral nail include i) the adequacy of the femoral neck width in the local population and ii) the potential difficulty encountered during fixation in certain prefixed angles as determined by the implant. This was a retrospective, descriptive study evaluating the anterior-posterior pelvic radiographs of 100 consecutive patients, from January to August 2007, managed at University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur. The femoral neck width in the population studied was adequate for placement of femoral neck screw and anti-rotation pin or hip pin using the proximal femoral nail implant. (mean = 34.0±3.7mm, min = 24.6mm). There was no significant difference between the working area using an implant angled at 130° or 135° (P=0.91). Both femoral neck width and neck shaft angle of the Malaysian population studied were not a factor influencing the placement of femoral neck lag screws and anti-rotation pin. Malaysian Medical Association 2009 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.um.edu.my/3595/1/is_the_femoral_neck_geometry_adequate_for_placement.pdf Chiu, Chee Kidd and Chan, Chris Yin Wei and Singh, Vivek Ajit (2009) Is the femoral neck geometry adequate for placement of the proximal femoral nail in the Malaysian population? A review of 100 cases. Medical Journal of Malaysia, 64 (1). pp. 22-26. ISSN 0300-5283, http://www.e-mjm.org/2009/v64n1/Proximal_Femoral.pdf
spellingShingle R Medicine
Chiu, Chee Kidd
Chan, Chris Yin Wei
Singh, Vivek Ajit
Is the femoral neck geometry adequate for placement of the proximal femoral nail in the Malaysian population? A review of 100 cases
title Is the femoral neck geometry adequate for placement of the proximal femoral nail in the Malaysian population? A review of 100 cases
title_full Is the femoral neck geometry adequate for placement of the proximal femoral nail in the Malaysian population? A review of 100 cases
title_fullStr Is the femoral neck geometry adequate for placement of the proximal femoral nail in the Malaysian population? A review of 100 cases
title_full_unstemmed Is the femoral neck geometry adequate for placement of the proximal femoral nail in the Malaysian population? A review of 100 cases
title_short Is the femoral neck geometry adequate for placement of the proximal femoral nail in the Malaysian population? A review of 100 cases
title_sort is the femoral neck geometry adequate for placement of the proximal femoral nail in the malaysian population a review of 100 cases
topic R Medicine
url http://eprints.um.edu.my/3595/1/is_the_femoral_neck_geometry_adequate_for_placement.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT chiucheekidd isthefemoralneckgeometryadequateforplacementoftheproximalfemoralnailinthemalaysianpopulationareviewof100cases
AT chanchrisyinwei isthefemoralneckgeometryadequateforplacementoftheproximalfemoralnailinthemalaysianpopulationareviewof100cases
AT singhvivekajit isthefemoralneckgeometryadequateforplacementoftheproximalfemoralnailinthemalaysianpopulationareviewof100cases