Comparing impeller performance for solid-suspension in the transitional flow regime with Newtonian fluids

Particle suspension in Newtonian fluids of viscosities from 0.01 to 1 Pa s have been studied using Rushton turbines, pitched blade turbines, Chemineer HE-3 and Lightnin' A310 hydrofoils (all pumping downwards), and Ekato Intermig agitators. By comparison to the turbulent system (Ibrahim and Nie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ibrahim, Shaliza, Nienow, A.W.
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier 1999
Subjects:
_version_ 1796945917736124416
author Ibrahim, Shaliza
Nienow, A.W.
author_facet Ibrahim, Shaliza
Nienow, A.W.
author_sort Ibrahim, Shaliza
collection UM
description Particle suspension in Newtonian fluids of viscosities from 0.01 to 1 Pa s have been studied using Rushton turbines, pitched blade turbines, Chemineer HE-3 and Lightnin' A310 hydrofoils (all pumping downwards), and Ekato Intermig agitators. By comparison to the turbulent system (Ibrahim and Nienow, 1996), at high viscosity, there was less random particle movement across the base prior to suspension. On the other hand, once the agitation speed, N, was high enough to achieve suspension, i.e., N = N(js), particles remained longer in suspension after a reduction to N < N(js), though eventually with little or no hysterisis. Suspension at high viscosity was achieved with a lower mean specific energy dissipation rate, (ε(T))(js), when using large D/T impellers whether of the radial or axial type. Thus, at Re > 3000, the optimum overall configuration was a D/T of about 0.4 with the downward pumping HE-3 and pitched blade turbines, whilst at Re < 3000, the optimimum was the HE-3 at a D/T of about 0.5. The performance of dual Intermigs with D/T ratios of ~0.6 dramatically improved as the viscosity increased to 0.1 Pa s, and the single Intermig was the most efficient impeller at 1 Pa s. The Zwietering equation was found unsuitable for prediction of N(js) at low Re. Particle suspension in Newtonian fluids of viscosities from 0.01 to 1 Pa s have been studied using Rushton turbines, pitched blade turbines, Chemineer HE-3 and Lightnin' A310 hydrofoils (all pumping downwards), and Ekato Intermig agitators. By comparison to the turbulent system, at high viscosity, there was less random particle movement across the base prior to suspension. On the other hand, once the agitation speed, N, was high enough to achieve suspension, i.e., N = Njs, particles remained longer in suspension after a reduction to N&lt;Njs, though eventually with little or no hysterisis. Suspension at high viscosity was achieved with a lower mean specific energy dissipation rate, (εT)js, when using large D/T impellers whether of the radial or axial type. Thus, at Re&gt;3000, the optimum overall configuration was a D/T of about 0.4 with the downward pumping HE-3 and pitched blade turbines, whilst at Re&lt;3000, the optimimum was the HE-3 at a D/T of about 0.5. The performance of dual Intermigs with D/T ratios of approximately 0.6 dramatically improved as the viscosity increased to 0.1 Pa s, and the single Intermig was the most efficient impeller at 1 Pa s. The Zwietering equation was found unsuitable for prediction of Njs at low Re.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T05:23:48Z
format Article
id um.eprints-9414
institution Universiti Malaya
last_indexed 2024-03-06T05:23:48Z
publishDate 1999
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling um.eprints-94142019-09-25T09:22:35Z http://eprints.um.edu.my/9414/ Comparing impeller performance for solid-suspension in the transitional flow regime with Newtonian fluids Ibrahim, Shaliza Nienow, A.W. T Technology (General) TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Particle suspension in Newtonian fluids of viscosities from 0.01 to 1 Pa s have been studied using Rushton turbines, pitched blade turbines, Chemineer HE-3 and Lightnin' A310 hydrofoils (all pumping downwards), and Ekato Intermig agitators. By comparison to the turbulent system (Ibrahim and Nienow, 1996), at high viscosity, there was less random particle movement across the base prior to suspension. On the other hand, once the agitation speed, N, was high enough to achieve suspension, i.e., N = N(js), particles remained longer in suspension after a reduction to N < N(js), though eventually with little or no hysterisis. Suspension at high viscosity was achieved with a lower mean specific energy dissipation rate, (ε(T))(js), when using large D/T impellers whether of the radial or axial type. Thus, at Re > 3000, the optimum overall configuration was a D/T of about 0.4 with the downward pumping HE-3 and pitched blade turbines, whilst at Re < 3000, the optimimum was the HE-3 at a D/T of about 0.5. The performance of dual Intermigs with D/T ratios of ~0.6 dramatically improved as the viscosity increased to 0.1 Pa s, and the single Intermig was the most efficient impeller at 1 Pa s. The Zwietering equation was found unsuitable for prediction of N(js) at low Re. Particle suspension in Newtonian fluids of viscosities from 0.01 to 1 Pa s have been studied using Rushton turbines, pitched blade turbines, Chemineer HE-3 and Lightnin' A310 hydrofoils (all pumping downwards), and Ekato Intermig agitators. By comparison to the turbulent system, at high viscosity, there was less random particle movement across the base prior to suspension. On the other hand, once the agitation speed, N, was high enough to achieve suspension, i.e., N = Njs, particles remained longer in suspension after a reduction to N&lt;Njs, though eventually with little or no hysterisis. Suspension at high viscosity was achieved with a lower mean specific energy dissipation rate, (εT)js, when using large D/T impellers whether of the radial or axial type. Thus, at Re&gt;3000, the optimum overall configuration was a D/T of about 0.4 with the downward pumping HE-3 and pitched blade turbines, whilst at Re&lt;3000, the optimimum was the HE-3 at a D/T of about 0.5. The performance of dual Intermigs with D/T ratios of approximately 0.6 dramatically improved as the viscosity increased to 0.1 Pa s, and the single Intermig was the most efficient impeller at 1 Pa s. The Zwietering equation was found unsuitable for prediction of Njs at low Re. Elsevier 1999 Article PeerReviewed Ibrahim, Shaliza and Nienow, A.W. (1999) Comparing impeller performance for solid-suspension in the transitional flow regime with Newtonian fluids. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 77 (A8). pp. 721-727. ISSN 0263-8762, DOI https://doi.org/10.1205/026387699526863 <https://doi.org/10.1205/026387699526863>. https://doi.org/10.1205/026387699526863 doi:10.1205/026387699526863
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Ibrahim, Shaliza
Nienow, A.W.
Comparing impeller performance for solid-suspension in the transitional flow regime with Newtonian fluids
title Comparing impeller performance for solid-suspension in the transitional flow regime with Newtonian fluids
title_full Comparing impeller performance for solid-suspension in the transitional flow regime with Newtonian fluids
title_fullStr Comparing impeller performance for solid-suspension in the transitional flow regime with Newtonian fluids
title_full_unstemmed Comparing impeller performance for solid-suspension in the transitional flow regime with Newtonian fluids
title_short Comparing impeller performance for solid-suspension in the transitional flow regime with Newtonian fluids
title_sort comparing impeller performance for solid suspension in the transitional flow regime with newtonian fluids
topic T Technology (General)
TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
work_keys_str_mv AT ibrahimshaliza comparingimpellerperformanceforsolidsuspensioninthetransitionalflowregimewithnewtonianfluids
AT nienowaw comparingimpellerperformanceforsolidsuspensioninthetransitionalflowregimewithnewtonianfluids