A Modified CRITIC Method to Estimate the Objective Weights of Decision Criteria

In this study, we developed a modified version of the CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method, namely the Distance Correlation-based CRITIC (D-CRITIC) method. The usage of the method was illustrated by evaluating the weights of five smartphone criteria. The same evaluat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anath Rau Krishnan, Maznah Mat Kasim, Mohamad Rizal Abdul Hamid, Mohd Fahmi Ghazali
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/33587/2/A%20Modified%20CRITIC%20Method%20to%20Estimate%20the%20Objective%20Weights%20of%20Decision%20Criteria.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/33587/3/A%20Modified%20CRITIC%20Method%20to%20Estimate%20the%20Objective%20Weights%20of%20Decision%20Criteria%20_ABSTRACT.pdf
Description
Summary:In this study, we developed a modified version of the CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method, namely the Distance Correlation-based CRITIC (D-CRITIC) method. The usage of the method was illustrated by evaluating the weights of five smartphone criteria. The same evaluation was repeated using four other objective weighting methods, including the original CRITIC method. The results from all the methods were further analyzed based on three different tests (i.e., the distance correlation test, the Spearman rank-order correlation test, and the symmetric mean absolute percentage error test) to validate D-CRITIC. The tests revealed that D-CRITIC could produce more valid criteria weights and ranks than the original CRITIC method since D-CRITIC yielded a higher average distance correlation, a higher average Spearman rank-order correlation, and a lower symmetric mean absolute percentage error. Besides, additional sensitivity analysis indicated that D-CRITIC has the tendency to deliver more stable criteria weights and ranks with a larger decision matrix. The research has contributed an alternative objective weighting method to the area of multi-criteria decision-making through a unique extension of distance correlation. This study is also the first to propose the idea of a distance correlation test to compare the performance of different criteria weighting methods.