Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the revised-skin management needs assessment checklist questionnaire in Malay language

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the revised-skin management needs assessment checklist questionnaire in Malay language

Show other versions (1)

Pressure injury (PI) related knowledge can be used as an outcome indicator of a PI education program. In Malaysia, no scale has been translated and validated for measuring PI-related knowledge among patients with a PI. The purpose of this study was to cross-culturally adapt, translate and determine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Deena Clare Thomas, Ping Lei Chui, Abqariyah Yahya, Jiann Wen Yap
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Tissue Viability Society 2022
Subjects:
BF1-990 Psychology
PL5051-5497 Malayan (Indonesian) languages
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/33677/1/Translation%2C%20cross-cultural%20adaptation%20and%20validation%20of%20the%20revised-skin%20management%20needs%20assessment%20checklist%20questionnaire%20in%20Malay%20language.ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/33677/2/Translation%2C%20cross-cultural%20adaptation%20and%20validation%20of%20the%20revised-skin%20management%20needs%20assessment%20checklist%20questionnaire%20in%20Malay%20language%20-%20FULLTEXT.pdf
Description
Summary:Pressure injury (PI) related knowledge can be used as an outcome indicator of a PI education program. In Malaysia, no scale has been translated and validated for measuring PI-related knowledge among patients with a PI. The purpose of this study was to cross-culturally adapt, translate and determine the validity and reliability of the Malay version of the revised-Skin Management Need Assessment Checklist (revised-SMnac). The instrument was initially written in English and translated into the Malay language. The internal consistency, construct validity, and test-retest reliability were examined after the item and scale's cross-cultural equivalence and content validity were evaluated. Construct validity was determined through the administration of the instrument amongst 170 hospitalised patients with a PI. Content validity index (CVI) was further determined through validation by a panel of five wound care experts. The instrument's stability was determined by the test-retest model with a two-week interval. The content validity of the item-CVI (I-CVI) was >79%, indicating that all 17-items were appropriate, while the scale-CVI (S-CVI) of >0.83 indicated an acceptable scale. The Cronbach's Alpha was .994 indicated good internal consistency. Test-retest showed a good intra-class correlation coefficient, ICC = 0.955 with 95% CI [0.992–0.996]. The Malay version of the revised-SMnac demonstrated to be a valid and reliable tool to measure PI-related knowledge among the Malay-speaking patient population in Malaysia. The tool is recommended for use to measure the effectiveness of education programs related to PI care in future studies.

Similar Items