Analyzing the science achievement test: Perspective of classical test theory and Rasch analysis

Assessment in teaching and learning allows both instructor and students to evaluate the achievement, performance and improve upon it. The achievement test appears as one of the most commonly used assessment tools to determine students' gains in the cognitive domain. The study analysed science a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Law, Hui Haw, Sabariah Sharif, Crispina Gregory K Han
Format: Article
Language:English
English
Published: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34988/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34988/2/FULLTEXT.pdf
_version_ 1825715153987960832
author Law, Hui Haw
Sabariah Sharif
Crispina Gregory K Han
author_facet Law, Hui Haw
Sabariah Sharif
Crispina Gregory K Han
author_sort Law, Hui Haw
collection UMS
description Assessment in teaching and learning allows both instructor and students to evaluate the achievement, performance and improve upon it. The achievement test appears as one of the most commonly used assessment tools to determine students' gains in the cognitive domain. The study analysed science achievement test (SAT), a multiple-choice test for grade 10 senior secondary school students. The 50 SAT items were developed in compliance with the Malaysian science curriculum specification. The face and content validity of SAT were validated by experts in the science field. The SAT was administered with 50 students in a pilot study. The collected data was analysed using item analysis based on classical test theory (CTT) and Rasch analysis. In terms of difficulty index (p), item analysis showed that there were five difficult items, 33 moderately difficult items, and 12 easy items. Findings also reported eight items presented as poor items due to the poor discriminating power. The SAT showed a good coefficient of 0.862 for Kuder-Richardson 20 (KR-20) and 0.851 for the split half method. While the Rasch analysis showed a reliable and good separation for both item and person. Besides, the Rasch analysis displayed that there are two items should be refreshed or removed. The study revealed that the SAT was a solid, valid, and reliable tool, which is suitable to be used to measure the student’s achievement in science.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T03:22:30Z
format Article
id ums.eprints-34988
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
language English
English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T03:22:30Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
record_format dspace
spelling ums.eprints-349882022-12-05T00:01:25Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34988/ Analyzing the science achievement test: Perspective of classical test theory and Rasch analysis Law, Hui Haw Sabariah Sharif Crispina Gregory K Han LB1603-1696.6 Secondary education. High schools LB5-3640 Theory and practice of education Assessment in teaching and learning allows both instructor and students to evaluate the achievement, performance and improve upon it. The achievement test appears as one of the most commonly used assessment tools to determine students' gains in the cognitive domain. The study analysed science achievement test (SAT), a multiple-choice test for grade 10 senior secondary school students. The 50 SAT items were developed in compliance with the Malaysian science curriculum specification. The face and content validity of SAT were validated by experts in the science field. The SAT was administered with 50 students in a pilot study. The collected data was analysed using item analysis based on classical test theory (CTT) and Rasch analysis. In terms of difficulty index (p), item analysis showed that there were five difficult items, 33 moderately difficult items, and 12 easy items. Findings also reported eight items presented as poor items due to the poor discriminating power. The SAT showed a good coefficient of 0.862 for Kuder-Richardson 20 (KR-20) and 0.851 for the split half method. While the Rasch analysis showed a reliable and good separation for both item and person. Besides, the Rasch analysis displayed that there are two items should be refreshed or removed. The study revealed that the SAT was a solid, valid, and reliable tool, which is suitable to be used to measure the student’s achievement in science. Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science 2022 Article PeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34988/1/ABSTRACT.pdf text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34988/2/FULLTEXT.pdf Law, Hui Haw and Sabariah Sharif and Crispina Gregory K Han (2022) Analyzing the science achievement test: Perspective of classical test theory and Rasch analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11. pp. 1714-1724. ISSN 2252-8822 (P-ISSN) , 2620-5440 (E-ISSN) https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/22304 https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.22304 https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.22304
spellingShingle LB1603-1696.6 Secondary education. High schools
LB5-3640 Theory and practice of education
Law, Hui Haw
Sabariah Sharif
Crispina Gregory K Han
Analyzing the science achievement test: Perspective of classical test theory and Rasch analysis
title Analyzing the science achievement test: Perspective of classical test theory and Rasch analysis
title_full Analyzing the science achievement test: Perspective of classical test theory and Rasch analysis
title_fullStr Analyzing the science achievement test: Perspective of classical test theory and Rasch analysis
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing the science achievement test: Perspective of classical test theory and Rasch analysis
title_short Analyzing the science achievement test: Perspective of classical test theory and Rasch analysis
title_sort analyzing the science achievement test perspective of classical test theory and rasch analysis
topic LB1603-1696.6 Secondary education. High schools
LB5-3640 Theory and practice of education
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34988/1/ABSTRACT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/34988/2/FULLTEXT.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT lawhuihaw analyzingthescienceachievementtestperspectiveofclassicaltesttheoryandraschanalysis
AT sabariahsharif analyzingthescienceachievementtestperspectiveofclassicaltesttheoryandraschanalysis
AT crispinagregorykhan analyzingthescienceachievementtestperspectiveofclassicaltesttheoryandraschanalysis