Tensile and physical properties of linear low-density polyethylene-natural rubber composite: comparison between size and filler types
Linear Low-Density Polyethylene-Natural Rubber (LLDPE-NR) composites in the ratio of 70:20 were made with different loadings of nanosilica and micro-scale Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA). Linear Low-Density Polyethylene grafted with maleic anhydride (LLDPE-g-MAH) of 10 wt% was added as a compatibiliser. Th...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
Materials and Energy Research Center
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41560/1/ABSTRACT.pdf https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41560/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf |
_version_ | 1825715887527690240 |
---|---|
author | Yanuar Z. Arief Mohamad Zul Hilmey Makmud Sahari Japar Siti Junian Mat Uzir Wahit |
author_facet | Yanuar Z. Arief Mohamad Zul Hilmey Makmud Sahari Japar Siti Junian Mat Uzir Wahit |
author_sort | Yanuar Z. Arief |
collection | UMS |
description | Linear Low-Density Polyethylene-Natural Rubber (LLDPE-NR) composites in the ratio of 70:20 were made with different loadings of nanosilica and micro-scale Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA). Linear Low-Density Polyethylene grafted with maleic anhydride (LLDPE-g-MAH) of 10 wt% was added as a compatibiliser. The composites were produced by using two-roll mill machine. The tensile properties of the composites were determined by carrying out tensile test. From the test, it was found that the tensile strength of LLDPE-NR decreased with increasing weight percentages of POFA in the composition. Tensile strength of LLDPE-NR increased with increasing nanosilica content of the composition. The water absorption test was done on all samples, and it was found that water absorption of LLDPE-NR nanocomposites decreased with increasing nanosilica content. However, water absorption of LLDPE-NR microcomposites increased with increasing POFA content. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-09T00:52:55Z |
format | Article |
id | ums.eprints-41560 |
institution | Universiti Malaysia Sabah |
language | English English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-09T00:52:55Z |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Materials and Energy Research Center |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | ums.eprints-415602024-10-24T04:14:08Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41560/ Tensile and physical properties of linear low-density polyethylene-natural rubber composite: comparison between size and filler types Yanuar Z. Arief Mohamad Zul Hilmey Makmud Sahari Japar Siti Junian Mat Uzir Wahit Q1-390 Science (General) T1-995 Technology (General) Linear Low-Density Polyethylene-Natural Rubber (LLDPE-NR) composites in the ratio of 70:20 were made with different loadings of nanosilica and micro-scale Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA). Linear Low-Density Polyethylene grafted with maleic anhydride (LLDPE-g-MAH) of 10 wt% was added as a compatibiliser. The composites were produced by using two-roll mill machine. The tensile properties of the composites were determined by carrying out tensile test. From the test, it was found that the tensile strength of LLDPE-NR decreased with increasing weight percentages of POFA in the composition. Tensile strength of LLDPE-NR increased with increasing nanosilica content of the composition. The water absorption test was done on all samples, and it was found that water absorption of LLDPE-NR nanocomposites decreased with increasing nanosilica content. However, water absorption of LLDPE-NR microcomposites increased with increasing POFA content. Materials and Energy Research Center 2016 Article NonPeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41560/1/ABSTRACT.pdf text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41560/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf Yanuar Z. Arief and Mohamad Zul Hilmey Makmud and Sahari Japar and Siti Junian and Mat Uzir Wahit (2016) Tensile and physical properties of linear low-density polyethylene-natural rubber composite: comparison between size and filler types. International Journal of Engineering, 29 (9). pp. 1257-1262. ISSN 1025-2495 https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ije.2016.29.09c.11 |
spellingShingle | Q1-390 Science (General) T1-995 Technology (General) Yanuar Z. Arief Mohamad Zul Hilmey Makmud Sahari Japar Siti Junian Mat Uzir Wahit Tensile and physical properties of linear low-density polyethylene-natural rubber composite: comparison between size and filler types |
title | Tensile and physical properties of linear low-density polyethylene-natural rubber composite: comparison between size and filler types |
title_full | Tensile and physical properties of linear low-density polyethylene-natural rubber composite: comparison between size and filler types |
title_fullStr | Tensile and physical properties of linear low-density polyethylene-natural rubber composite: comparison between size and filler types |
title_full_unstemmed | Tensile and physical properties of linear low-density polyethylene-natural rubber composite: comparison between size and filler types |
title_short | Tensile and physical properties of linear low-density polyethylene-natural rubber composite: comparison between size and filler types |
title_sort | tensile and physical properties of linear low density polyethylene natural rubber composite comparison between size and filler types |
topic | Q1-390 Science (General) T1-995 Technology (General) |
url | https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41560/1/ABSTRACT.pdf https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/41560/2/FULL%20TEXT.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanuarzarief tensileandphysicalpropertiesoflinearlowdensitypolyethylenenaturalrubbercompositecomparisonbetweensizeandfillertypes AT mohamadzulhilmeymakmud tensileandphysicalpropertiesoflinearlowdensitypolyethylenenaturalrubbercompositecomparisonbetweensizeandfillertypes AT saharijapar tensileandphysicalpropertiesoflinearlowdensitypolyethylenenaturalrubbercompositecomparisonbetweensizeandfillertypes AT sitijunian tensileandphysicalpropertiesoflinearlowdensitypolyethylenenaturalrubbercompositecomparisonbetweensizeandfillertypes AT matuzirwahit tensileandphysicalpropertiesoflinearlowdensitypolyethylenenaturalrubbercompositecomparisonbetweensizeandfillertypes |