Rejected sago starch as a coating material to mitigate urea-nitrogen emission

Urea–nitrogen is commonly lost through ammonia (NH3) volatilization, denitrification, and nitrate (NO3−) leaching. Rejected sago starch (RSS), which is a by-product of sago flour extraction, could be used to minimize NH3 volatilization from urea. Urea granules were coated with different concentratio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kavitha, Rajan, Latifah, Omar, Ahmed, Osumanu Haruna, Primus, Walter Charles, Susilawati, Kasim
Format: Article
Published: MDPI 2022
_version_ 1825938786396143616
author Kavitha, Rajan
Latifah, Omar
Ahmed, Osumanu Haruna
Primus, Walter Charles
Susilawati, Kasim
author_facet Kavitha, Rajan
Latifah, Omar
Ahmed, Osumanu Haruna
Primus, Walter Charles
Susilawati, Kasim
author_sort Kavitha, Rajan
collection UPM
description Urea–nitrogen is commonly lost through ammonia (NH3) volatilization, denitrification, and nitrate (NO3−) leaching. Rejected sago starch (RSS), which is a by-product of sago flour extraction, could be used to minimize NH3 volatilization from urea. Urea granules were coated with different concentrations of RSS (2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, and 6%), and their effects on NH3 emission, soil pH, exchangeable ammonium (NH4+), and available NO3− were determined. The urea was coated with RSS and homogenized using a mini rotary machine. The RSS-coated urea granules were dyed to differentiate their concentrations. The effectiveness of the RSS as a coating material was determined using a closed-dynamic air flow system. The soil used in the NH3 volatilization was the Bekenu series (Sandy loam, Typic Paleudults). This study compared seven different mixture treatments: soil alone (S), 5 g of uncoated urea (U), 5 g of 2% RSS-coated urea (CU1), 5 g of 3% RSS-coated urea (CU2), 5 g of 4% RSS-coated urea (CU3), 5 g of 5% RSS-coated urea (CU4), and 5 g of 6% RSS-coated urea (CU5). Urea coated with RSS, particularly CU1, effectively minimized NH3 loss and improved the retention of soil exchangeable NH4+ and available NO3− compared with uncoated urea because the RSS serves as a barrier to minimizing the concentration of NH3 from urea hydrolysis. Urea could be coated with RSS at the 2% concentration to enhance urea–N efficiency through a reduction in NH3 emission from urea. RSS-coated urea could be an alternative for farmers because of its controlled release of N and economical benefits. Field planting using rice as a test crop to solidify the effectiveness of RSS-coated urea in improving N retention from urea is still ongoing.
first_indexed 2024-09-25T03:37:28Z
format Article
id upm.eprints-103021
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
last_indexed 2024-09-25T03:37:28Z
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-1030212024-06-23T01:11:28Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/103021/ Rejected sago starch as a coating material to mitigate urea-nitrogen emission Kavitha, Rajan Latifah, Omar Ahmed, Osumanu Haruna Primus, Walter Charles Susilawati, Kasim Urea–nitrogen is commonly lost through ammonia (NH3) volatilization, denitrification, and nitrate (NO3−) leaching. Rejected sago starch (RSS), which is a by-product of sago flour extraction, could be used to minimize NH3 volatilization from urea. Urea granules were coated with different concentrations of RSS (2%, 3%, 4%, 5%, and 6%), and their effects on NH3 emission, soil pH, exchangeable ammonium (NH4+), and available NO3− were determined. The urea was coated with RSS and homogenized using a mini rotary machine. The RSS-coated urea granules were dyed to differentiate their concentrations. The effectiveness of the RSS as a coating material was determined using a closed-dynamic air flow system. The soil used in the NH3 volatilization was the Bekenu series (Sandy loam, Typic Paleudults). This study compared seven different mixture treatments: soil alone (S), 5 g of uncoated urea (U), 5 g of 2% RSS-coated urea (CU1), 5 g of 3% RSS-coated urea (CU2), 5 g of 4% RSS-coated urea (CU3), 5 g of 5% RSS-coated urea (CU4), and 5 g of 6% RSS-coated urea (CU5). Urea coated with RSS, particularly CU1, effectively minimized NH3 loss and improved the retention of soil exchangeable NH4+ and available NO3− compared with uncoated urea because the RSS serves as a barrier to minimizing the concentration of NH3 from urea hydrolysis. Urea could be coated with RSS at the 2% concentration to enhance urea–N efficiency through a reduction in NH3 emission from urea. RSS-coated urea could be an alternative for farmers because of its controlled release of N and economical benefits. Field planting using rice as a test crop to solidify the effectiveness of RSS-coated urea in improving N retention from urea is still ongoing. MDPI 2022 Article PeerReviewed Kavitha, Rajan and Latifah, Omar and Ahmed, Osumanu Haruna and Primus, Walter Charles and Susilawati, Kasim (2022) Rejected sago starch as a coating material to mitigate urea-nitrogen emission. Agronomy, 12 (4). art. no. 941. pp. 1-17. ISSN 2073-4395 https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/12/4/941 10.3390/agronomy12040941
spellingShingle Kavitha, Rajan
Latifah, Omar
Ahmed, Osumanu Haruna
Primus, Walter Charles
Susilawati, Kasim
Rejected sago starch as a coating material to mitigate urea-nitrogen emission
title Rejected sago starch as a coating material to mitigate urea-nitrogen emission
title_full Rejected sago starch as a coating material to mitigate urea-nitrogen emission
title_fullStr Rejected sago starch as a coating material to mitigate urea-nitrogen emission
title_full_unstemmed Rejected sago starch as a coating material to mitigate urea-nitrogen emission
title_short Rejected sago starch as a coating material to mitigate urea-nitrogen emission
title_sort rejected sago starch as a coating material to mitigate urea nitrogen emission
work_keys_str_mv AT kavitharajan rejectedsagostarchasacoatingmaterialtomitigateureanitrogenemission
AT latifahomar rejectedsagostarchasacoatingmaterialtomitigateureanitrogenemission
AT ahmedosumanuharuna rejectedsagostarchasacoatingmaterialtomitigateureanitrogenemission
AT primuswaltercharles rejectedsagostarchasacoatingmaterialtomitigateureanitrogenemission
AT susilawatikasim rejectedsagostarchasacoatingmaterialtomitigateureanitrogenemission