Balancing ambitions and realities: stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's forests

The jurisdictional approach concept emerged in response to the widespread failure of sectoral forest conservation projects. Despite its increasing popularity, understanding jurisdictional approach outcomes is challenging, given that many remain in either the formation or implementation stage. Furthe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ng, Julia Su Chen, Chervier, Colas, Carmenta, Rachel, Samdin, Zaiton, Azhar, Badrul, Karsenty, Alain
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature
_version_ 1825939415225073664
author Ng, Julia Su Chen
Chervier, Colas
Carmenta, Rachel
Samdin, Zaiton
Azhar, Badrul
Karsenty, Alain
author_facet Ng, Julia Su Chen
Chervier, Colas
Carmenta, Rachel
Samdin, Zaiton
Azhar, Badrul
Karsenty, Alain
author_sort Ng, Julia Su Chen
collection UPM
description The jurisdictional approach concept emerged in response to the widespread failure of sectoral forest conservation projects. Despite its increasing popularity, understanding jurisdictional approach outcomes is challenging, given that many remain in either the formation or implementation stage. Furthermore, diverse stakeholders hold different perspectives on what exactly a jurisdictional approach is intended to pursue. These different perspectives are important to unravel, as having a shared understanding of the outcomes is important to build the critical support needed for it. This study aims to add to the limited evidence with a case study in Sabah, Malaysia, which is committed to addressing a leading deforestation driver (palm oil) through sustainability certification in a jurisdiction. We used Q-methodology to explore stakeholder perceptions, revealing three distinct perspectives regarding what outcomes jurisdictional approaches should pursue. We asked about outcomes achievable within ten years (2022“2032) and considering real-world constraints. We found different perspectives regarding economic, environmental, governance, and smallholders welfare outcomes. However, we found consensus among stakeholders about some outcomes: (i) that achieving zero-deforestation is untenable, (ii) that issuing compensation or incentives to private land owners to not convert forests into plantations is unrealistic, (iii) that the human well-being of plantation workers could improve through better welfare, and (iv) the free, prior and informed consent given by local communities being required legally. The findings offer insights into key stakeholders perceptions of the deliverables of jurisdictional approaches and the difficulty of achieving its objectives under real-world constraints.
first_indexed 2024-09-25T03:39:45Z
format Article
id upm.eprints-106846
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
last_indexed 2024-09-25T03:39:45Z
publisher Springer Nature
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-1068462024-08-06T02:51:33Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/106846/ Balancing ambitions and realities: stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's forests Ng, Julia Su Chen Chervier, Colas Carmenta, Rachel Samdin, Zaiton Azhar, Badrul Karsenty, Alain The jurisdictional approach concept emerged in response to the widespread failure of sectoral forest conservation projects. Despite its increasing popularity, understanding jurisdictional approach outcomes is challenging, given that many remain in either the formation or implementation stage. Furthermore, diverse stakeholders hold different perspectives on what exactly a jurisdictional approach is intended to pursue. These different perspectives are important to unravel, as having a shared understanding of the outcomes is important to build the critical support needed for it. This study aims to add to the limited evidence with a case study in Sabah, Malaysia, which is committed to addressing a leading deforestation driver (palm oil) through sustainability certification in a jurisdiction. We used Q-methodology to explore stakeholder perceptions, revealing three distinct perspectives regarding what outcomes jurisdictional approaches should pursue. We asked about outcomes achievable within ten years (2022“2032) and considering real-world constraints. We found different perspectives regarding economic, environmental, governance, and smallholders welfare outcomes. However, we found consensus among stakeholders about some outcomes: (i) that achieving zero-deforestation is untenable, (ii) that issuing compensation or incentives to private land owners to not convert forests into plantations is unrealistic, (iii) that the human well-being of plantation workers could improve through better welfare, and (iv) the free, prior and informed consent given by local communities being required legally. The findings offer insights into key stakeholders perceptions of the deliverables of jurisdictional approaches and the difficulty of achieving its objectives under real-world constraints. Springer Nature Article PeerReviewed Ng, Julia Su Chen and Chervier, Colas and Carmenta, Rachel and Samdin, Zaiton and Azhar, Badrul and Karsenty, Alain Balancing ambitions and realities: stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's forests. Environmental Management, 73 (1). pp. 259-273. ISSN 0364-152X; ESSN: 1432-1009 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-023-01876-z 10.1007/s00267-023-01876-z
spellingShingle Ng, Julia Su Chen
Chervier, Colas
Carmenta, Rachel
Samdin, Zaiton
Azhar, Badrul
Karsenty, Alain
Balancing ambitions and realities: stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's forests
title Balancing ambitions and realities: stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's forests
title_full Balancing ambitions and realities: stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's forests
title_fullStr Balancing ambitions and realities: stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's forests
title_full_unstemmed Balancing ambitions and realities: stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's forests
title_short Balancing ambitions and realities: stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in Sabah's forests
title_sort balancing ambitions and realities stakeholder perspectives on jurisdictional approach outcomes in sabah s forests
work_keys_str_mv AT ngjuliasuchen balancingambitionsandrealitiesstakeholderperspectivesonjurisdictionalapproachoutcomesinsabahsforests
AT cherviercolas balancingambitionsandrealitiesstakeholderperspectivesonjurisdictionalapproachoutcomesinsabahsforests
AT carmentarachel balancingambitionsandrealitiesstakeholderperspectivesonjurisdictionalapproachoutcomesinsabahsforests
AT samdinzaiton balancingambitionsandrealitiesstakeholderperspectivesonjurisdictionalapproachoutcomesinsabahsforests
AT azharbadrul balancingambitionsandrealitiesstakeholderperspectivesonjurisdictionalapproachoutcomesinsabahsforests
AT karsentyalain balancingambitionsandrealitiesstakeholderperspectivesonjurisdictionalapproachoutcomesinsabahsforests