Systematic literature review of Ecological Discourse Analysis from 2014 to 2023
One of the crucial foci of contemporary linguistics is upon the complex human-nature relationship within the Anthropocene. An essential methodology of eco-linguistics is Ecological Discourse Analysis (EDA), a field that combines linguistics and ecology. The philosophical underpinning of EDA is roote...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
Academy Publication
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/114379/1/114379.pdf |
| _version_ | 1824452397529825280 |
|---|---|
| author | Chu, Aixuan Ang, Lay Hoon Abdul Halim, Hazlina |
| author_facet | Chu, Aixuan Ang, Lay Hoon Abdul Halim, Hazlina |
| author_sort | Chu, Aixuan |
| collection | UPM |
| description | One of the crucial foci of contemporary linguistics is upon the complex human-nature relationship within the Anthropocene. An essential methodology of eco-linguistics is Ecological Discourse Analysis (EDA), a field that combines linguistics and ecology. The philosophical underpinning of EDA is rooted in an ecological thematic framework, emphasizing the significance of biodiversity and sustainability in the natural world. Despite gaining attention over the past decade, EDA still lacks a comprehensive explanation to adequately and accurately explain the fundamental assertion of its philosophical framework: it gives undue prominence to language biodiversity and sustainability. This systematic literature review, conducted using the PRISMA 2020 paradigm, covers studies from 2014 to 2023. It examines 38 works on EDA across several genres. Further clues illustrate the application of EDA to various genres, often informed by theoretical frameworks associated with systemic functional linguistics, cognitive linguistics, and corpus linguistics. EDA research concentrates on ecological discourse and advocating for protection, exposing the lack of nomenclature, analytical framework, application domain, theoretical framework, and objectives. Furthermore, EDA faces challenges in effectively addressing ecological issues within discourse construction because it does not have a sound theoretical paradigm or enough systematicity. Furthermore, the texts analyzed using EDA predominantly focus on ecological discourse, with only a few studies incorporating non-ecological literary texts. This underscores the necessity of expanding the scope of ecological linguistic research. |
| first_indexed | 2025-02-19T02:49:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | upm.eprints-114379 |
| institution | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
| language | English English |
| last_indexed | 2025-02-19T02:49:53Z |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Academy Publication |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | upm.eprints-1143792025-01-20T00:51:15Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/114379/ Systematic literature review of Ecological Discourse Analysis from 2014 to 2023 Chu, Aixuan Ang, Lay Hoon Abdul Halim, Hazlina One of the crucial foci of contemporary linguistics is upon the complex human-nature relationship within the Anthropocene. An essential methodology of eco-linguistics is Ecological Discourse Analysis (EDA), a field that combines linguistics and ecology. The philosophical underpinning of EDA is rooted in an ecological thematic framework, emphasizing the significance of biodiversity and sustainability in the natural world. Despite gaining attention over the past decade, EDA still lacks a comprehensive explanation to adequately and accurately explain the fundamental assertion of its philosophical framework: it gives undue prominence to language biodiversity and sustainability. This systematic literature review, conducted using the PRISMA 2020 paradigm, covers studies from 2014 to 2023. It examines 38 works on EDA across several genres. Further clues illustrate the application of EDA to various genres, often informed by theoretical frameworks associated with systemic functional linguistics, cognitive linguistics, and corpus linguistics. EDA research concentrates on ecological discourse and advocating for protection, exposing the lack of nomenclature, analytical framework, application domain, theoretical framework, and objectives. Furthermore, EDA faces challenges in effectively addressing ecological issues within discourse construction because it does not have a sound theoretical paradigm or enough systematicity. Furthermore, the texts analyzed using EDA predominantly focus on ecological discourse, with only a few studies incorporating non-ecological literary texts. This underscores the necessity of expanding the scope of ecological linguistic research. Academy Publication 2024-11-13 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/114379/1/114379.pdf Chu, Aixuan and Ang, Lay Hoon and Abdul Halim, Hazlina (2024) Systematic literature review of Ecological Discourse Analysis from 2014 to 2023. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14 (11). pp. 3431-3442. ISSN 1799-2591; eISSN: 2053-0692 https://tpls.academypublication.com/index.php/tpls/article/view/9051 Linguistics Discourse analysis 10.17507/tpls.1411.12 English |
| spellingShingle | Linguistics Discourse analysis Chu, Aixuan Ang, Lay Hoon Abdul Halim, Hazlina Systematic literature review of Ecological Discourse Analysis from 2014 to 2023 |
| title | Systematic literature review of Ecological Discourse Analysis from 2014 to 2023 |
| title_full | Systematic literature review of Ecological Discourse Analysis from 2014 to 2023 |
| title_fullStr | Systematic literature review of Ecological Discourse Analysis from 2014 to 2023 |
| title_full_unstemmed | Systematic literature review of Ecological Discourse Analysis from 2014 to 2023 |
| title_short | Systematic literature review of Ecological Discourse Analysis from 2014 to 2023 |
| title_sort | systematic literature review of ecological discourse analysis from 2014 to 2023 |
| topic | Linguistics Discourse analysis |
| url | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/114379/1/114379.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT chuaixuan systematicliteraturereviewofecologicaldiscourseanalysisfrom2014to2023 AT anglayhoon systematicliteraturereviewofecologicaldiscourseanalysisfrom2014to2023 AT abdulhalimhazlina systematicliteraturereviewofecologicaldiscourseanalysisfrom2014to2023 |