Red flags in patients presenting with headache: Clinical indications for neuroimaging

Headache is a very common patient complaint but secondary causes for headache are unusual. Neuroimaging is both expensive and has a low yield in this group. Most patients with intracranial pathology have clinical features that would raise a "red flag". Appropriate selection of patients wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sobri, M., Lamont, A.C., Alias, N.A., Win, M.N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The British Institute of Radiology 2003
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/114408/1/114408.pdf
_version_ 1824452402944671744
author Sobri, M.
Lamont, A.C.
Alias, N.A.
Win, M.N.
author_facet Sobri, M.
Lamont, A.C.
Alias, N.A.
Win, M.N.
author_sort Sobri, M.
collection UPM
description Headache is a very common patient complaint but secondary causes for headache are unusual. Neuroimaging is both expensive and has a low yield in this group. Most patients with intracranial pathology have clinical features that would raise a "red flag". Appropriate selection of patients with headache for neuroimaging to look for secondary causes is very important. Red flags act as screening tools to help in identifying those patients presenting with headache who would benefit from prompt neuroimaging, and may increase the yield. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical features in patients with headache using neuroimaging as a screening tool for intracranial pathology. 20 red flags were defined. A retrospective study of 111 patients was performed and the outcomes were divided into positive and negative. Abnormal neuroimaging was present in 39 patients. Results were analysed using the Logistic Regression model. Sensitivity and specificity of red flags were analysed to establish the cut-off point to predict abnormal neuroimaging and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve plotted to show the sensitivity of the diagnostic test. Three red flag features proved to be statistically significant with the p-value of less than 0.05 on both univariate and multivariate analysis. These were: paralysis; papilloedema; and "drowsiness, confusion, memory impairment and loss of consciousness". In addition, if three or more red flags from the list were present, this showed strong indication of abnormal neuroimaging, from cut-off point of ROC curve (area under the curve =0.76).
first_indexed 2025-02-19T02:49:58Z
format Article
id upm.eprints-114408
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-19T02:49:58Z
publishDate 2003
publisher The British Institute of Radiology
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-1144082025-02-05T03:49:37Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/114408/ Red flags in patients presenting with headache: Clinical indications for neuroimaging Sobri, M. Lamont, A.C. Alias, N.A. Win, M.N. Headache is a very common patient complaint but secondary causes for headache are unusual. Neuroimaging is both expensive and has a low yield in this group. Most patients with intracranial pathology have clinical features that would raise a "red flag". Appropriate selection of patients with headache for neuroimaging to look for secondary causes is very important. Red flags act as screening tools to help in identifying those patients presenting with headache who would benefit from prompt neuroimaging, and may increase the yield. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical features in patients with headache using neuroimaging as a screening tool for intracranial pathology. 20 red flags were defined. A retrospective study of 111 patients was performed and the outcomes were divided into positive and negative. Abnormal neuroimaging was present in 39 patients. Results were analysed using the Logistic Regression model. Sensitivity and specificity of red flags were analysed to establish the cut-off point to predict abnormal neuroimaging and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve plotted to show the sensitivity of the diagnostic test. Three red flag features proved to be statistically significant with the p-value of less than 0.05 on both univariate and multivariate analysis. These were: paralysis; papilloedema; and "drowsiness, confusion, memory impairment and loss of consciousness". In addition, if three or more red flags from the list were present, this showed strong indication of abnormal neuroimaging, from cut-off point of ROC curve (area under the curve =0.76). The British Institute of Radiology 2003 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/114408/1/114408.pdf Sobri, M. and Lamont, A.C. and Alias, N.A. and Win, M.N. (2003) Red flags in patients presenting with headache: Clinical indications for neuroimaging. British Journal of Radiology, 76 (908). pp. 532-535. ISSN 0007-1285; eISSN: 0007-1285 https://academic.oup.com/bjr/article/76/908/532-535/7470561 10.1259/bjr/89012738
spellingShingle Sobri, M.
Lamont, A.C.
Alias, N.A.
Win, M.N.
Red flags in patients presenting with headache: Clinical indications for neuroimaging
title Red flags in patients presenting with headache: Clinical indications for neuroimaging
title_full Red flags in patients presenting with headache: Clinical indications for neuroimaging
title_fullStr Red flags in patients presenting with headache: Clinical indications for neuroimaging
title_full_unstemmed Red flags in patients presenting with headache: Clinical indications for neuroimaging
title_short Red flags in patients presenting with headache: Clinical indications for neuroimaging
title_sort red flags in patients presenting with headache clinical indications for neuroimaging
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/114408/1/114408.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sobrim redflagsinpatientspresentingwithheadacheclinicalindicationsforneuroimaging
AT lamontac redflagsinpatientspresentingwithheadacheclinicalindicationsforneuroimaging
AT aliasna redflagsinpatientspresentingwithheadacheclinicalindicationsforneuroimaging
AT winmn redflagsinpatientspresentingwithheadacheclinicalindicationsforneuroimaging