Estimating nitrate leaching and denitrification by simultaneous use of Br and 15N tracers
Losses or nitrogen (N) by leaching were estimated in three experiments using bromide (Br) as a tracer. An estimate or denitrification was also made, by difference, by combining the estimate of leaching with a measure of total loss of applied N using 15N. This was compared with a direct measure of de...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Published: |
Wiley
1994
|
_version_ | 1825940608316866560 |
---|---|
author | Bakar, Rosenani Abu Goulding, Keith W T Webster, Colin P Poulton, Paul R Powlson, David S |
author_facet | Bakar, Rosenani Abu Goulding, Keith W T Webster, Colin P Poulton, Paul R Powlson, David S |
author_sort | Bakar, Rosenani Abu |
collection | UPM |
description | Losses or nitrogen (N) by leaching were estimated in three experiments using bromide (Br) as a tracer. An estimate or denitrification was also made, by difference, by combining the estimate of leaching with a measure of total loss of applied N using 15N. This was compared with a direct measure of denitrification made using acetylene inhibition. Bromide proved to be a poor tracer for nitrate (NO3) leaching at two of the three sites, Brimstone and Hoosfield. Performance was rather better at the Broad Mead site. Problems in using Br were associated with (a) difficulties in measuring small concentrations of Br close to background in soil, and (b) reactions involving N such as immobilisation and mineralisation that rapidly change NO3 pools but do not affect Br. Use of Br in field experiments is unlikely to provide reliable estimates of NO3 leaching over timescales of several weeks as used here unless much more frequent sampling is done. Simultaneous measurements of total losses of N using a 15N tracer were combined with estimates of NO3 leaching using Br to calculate denitrification; these estimates were compared with measurements of denitrification using acetylene inhibition. Agreement was poor because of (i) the lack of reliability of the acetylene inhibition technique, and (ii) the very large errors associated with calculating denitrification as the difference between an estimate of NO3 leaching and total N losses. |
first_indexed | 2025-03-07T13:04:21Z |
format | Article |
id | upm.eprints-115069 |
institution | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
last_indexed | 2025-03-07T13:04:21Z |
publishDate | 1994 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | upm.eprints-1150692025-02-19T02:48:13Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/115069/ Estimating nitrate leaching and denitrification by simultaneous use of Br and 15N tracers Bakar, Rosenani Abu Goulding, Keith W T Webster, Colin P Poulton, Paul R Powlson, David S Losses or nitrogen (N) by leaching were estimated in three experiments using bromide (Br) as a tracer. An estimate or denitrification was also made, by difference, by combining the estimate of leaching with a measure of total loss of applied N using 15N. This was compared with a direct measure of denitrification made using acetylene inhibition. Bromide proved to be a poor tracer for nitrate (NO3) leaching at two of the three sites, Brimstone and Hoosfield. Performance was rather better at the Broad Mead site. Problems in using Br were associated with (a) difficulties in measuring small concentrations of Br close to background in soil, and (b) reactions involving N such as immobilisation and mineralisation that rapidly change NO3 pools but do not affect Br. Use of Br in field experiments is unlikely to provide reliable estimates of NO3 leaching over timescales of several weeks as used here unless much more frequent sampling is done. Simultaneous measurements of total losses of N using a 15N tracer were combined with estimates of NO3 leaching using Br to calculate denitrification; these estimates were compared with measurements of denitrification using acetylene inhibition. Agreement was poor because of (i) the lack of reliability of the acetylene inhibition technique, and (ii) the very large errors associated with calculating denitrification as the difference between an estimate of NO3 leaching and total N losses. Wiley 1994 Article PeerReviewed Bakar, Rosenani Abu and Goulding, Keith W T and Webster, Colin P and Poulton, Paul R and Powlson, David S (1994) Estimating nitrate leaching and denitrification by simultaneous use of Br and 15N tracers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 66 (4). pp. 509-519. ISSN 0022-5142; eISSN: 1097-0010 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsfa.2740660414 10.1002/jsfa.2740660414 |
spellingShingle | Bakar, Rosenani Abu Goulding, Keith W T Webster, Colin P Poulton, Paul R Powlson, David S Estimating nitrate leaching and denitrification by simultaneous use of Br and 15N tracers |
title | Estimating nitrate leaching and denitrification by simultaneous use of Br and 15N tracers |
title_full | Estimating nitrate leaching and denitrification by simultaneous use of Br and 15N tracers |
title_fullStr | Estimating nitrate leaching and denitrification by simultaneous use of Br and 15N tracers |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating nitrate leaching and denitrification by simultaneous use of Br and 15N tracers |
title_short | Estimating nitrate leaching and denitrification by simultaneous use of Br and 15N tracers |
title_sort | estimating nitrate leaching and denitrification by simultaneous use of br and 15n tracers |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bakarrosenaniabu estimatingnitrateleachinganddenitrificationbysimultaneoususeofbrand15ntracers AT gouldingkeithwt estimatingnitrateleachinganddenitrificationbysimultaneoususeofbrand15ntracers AT webstercolinp estimatingnitrateleachinganddenitrificationbysimultaneoususeofbrand15ntracers AT poultonpaulr estimatingnitrateleachinganddenitrificationbysimultaneoususeofbrand15ntracers AT powlsondavids estimatingnitrateleachinganddenitrificationbysimultaneoususeofbrand15ntracers |