Does disclosure of enforcement strategies affect tax minimisation? a multi-method approach

Tax gap and tax legitimacy are major concerns in every tax jurisdiction. There are inconsistent findings on the impact of legality and probability of detection on non-compliance behaviour. This study combines economic and socio-psychological elements by exploring how do disclosures of enforcement st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chong, K-Rine, Yusri, Yusniyati, Ong, Tze San, Selamat, Aslam Izah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia 2018
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/22660/1/33%29%20Does%20Disclosure%20of%20Enforcement%20Strategies.pdf
_version_ 1825925196617351168
author Chong, K-Rine
Yusri, Yusniyati
Ong, Tze San
Selamat, Aslam Izah
author_facet Chong, K-Rine
Yusri, Yusniyati
Ong, Tze San
Selamat, Aslam Izah
author_sort Chong, K-Rine
collection UPM
description Tax gap and tax legitimacy are major concerns in every tax jurisdiction. There are inconsistent findings on the impact of legality and probability of detection on non-compliance behaviour. This study combines economic and socio-psychological elements by exploring how do disclosures of enforcement strategies and legality affect tax minimisation under different tax climate. Multi-method approach is applied with a classroom experiment and a survey which comprises three subgroups, namely postgraduate, employed, and self-employed group. It is discovered that, the experimental subjects assigned under the antagonistic climate will carry on with their tax minimisation decision regardless of the disclosures of enforcements and legality. Interestingly, while such disclosure of enforcements is significant to ‘postgraduate’ and ‘employed’ survey respondents under both climates, legality is only significant to both subgroups under synergistic climate. Without any significant relationships between disclosures and minimisation, self-employed individuals are unresponsive towards enforcements probably because it is easier for them to manipulate their reported income. In sum, perhaps other socio-psychological factors should be prioritised in addition to stringent enforcement to reduce illegal tax minimisation.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T07:54:36Z
format Article
id upm.eprints-22660
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T07:54:36Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-226602019-11-12T07:35:36Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/22660/ Does disclosure of enforcement strategies affect tax minimisation? a multi-method approach Chong, K-Rine Yusri, Yusniyati Ong, Tze San Selamat, Aslam Izah Tax gap and tax legitimacy are major concerns in every tax jurisdiction. There are inconsistent findings on the impact of legality and probability of detection on non-compliance behaviour. This study combines economic and socio-psychological elements by exploring how do disclosures of enforcement strategies and legality affect tax minimisation under different tax climate. Multi-method approach is applied with a classroom experiment and a survey which comprises three subgroups, namely postgraduate, employed, and self-employed group. It is discovered that, the experimental subjects assigned under the antagonistic climate will carry on with their tax minimisation decision regardless of the disclosures of enforcements and legality. Interestingly, while such disclosure of enforcements is significant to ‘postgraduate’ and ‘employed’ survey respondents under both climates, legality is only significant to both subgroups under synergistic climate. Without any significant relationships between disclosures and minimisation, self-employed individuals are unresponsive towards enforcements probably because it is easier for them to manipulate their reported income. In sum, perhaps other socio-psychological factors should be prioritised in addition to stringent enforcement to reduce illegal tax minimisation. Faculty of Economics and Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia 2018 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/22660/1/33%29%20Does%20Disclosure%20of%20Enforcement%20Strategies.pdf Chong, K-Rine and Yusri, Yusniyati and Ong, Tze San and Selamat, Aslam Izah (2018) Does disclosure of enforcement strategies affect tax minimisation? a multi-method approach. International Journal of Economics and Management, 12 (spec. 2). pp. 759-769. ISSN 1823-836X; ESSN: 2600-9390 http://www.ijem.upm.edu.my/vol12_noS2/33)%20Does%20Disclosure%20of%20Enforcement%20Strategies.pdf
spellingShingle Chong, K-Rine
Yusri, Yusniyati
Ong, Tze San
Selamat, Aslam Izah
Does disclosure of enforcement strategies affect tax minimisation? a multi-method approach
title Does disclosure of enforcement strategies affect tax minimisation? a multi-method approach
title_full Does disclosure of enforcement strategies affect tax minimisation? a multi-method approach
title_fullStr Does disclosure of enforcement strategies affect tax minimisation? a multi-method approach
title_full_unstemmed Does disclosure of enforcement strategies affect tax minimisation? a multi-method approach
title_short Does disclosure of enforcement strategies affect tax minimisation? a multi-method approach
title_sort does disclosure of enforcement strategies affect tax minimisation a multi method approach
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/22660/1/33%29%20Does%20Disclosure%20of%20Enforcement%20Strategies.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT chongkrine doesdisclosureofenforcementstrategiesaffecttaxminimisationamultimethodapproach
AT yusriyusniyati doesdisclosureofenforcementstrategiesaffecttaxminimisationamultimethodapproach
AT ongtzesan doesdisclosureofenforcementstrategiesaffecttaxminimisationamultimethodapproach
AT selamataslamizah doesdisclosureofenforcementstrategiesaffecttaxminimisationamultimethodapproach