Agency theory and managerial ownership: evidence from Malaysia

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of managerial ownership in relation to agency theory in the Malaysian business environment. In addition to examining the total managerial shareholdings, this study also investigates the association between direct and indirect managerial...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mustapha, Mazlina, Che Ahmad, Ayoib
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Group Publishing 2011
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/22805/1/Agency%20theory%20and%20managerial%20ownership.pdf
_version_ 1796970234901430272
author Mustapha, Mazlina
Che Ahmad, Ayoib
author_facet Mustapha, Mazlina
Che Ahmad, Ayoib
author_sort Mustapha, Mazlina
collection UPM
description Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of managerial ownership in relation to agency theory in the Malaysian business environment. In addition to examining the total managerial shareholdings, this study also investigates the association between direct and indirect managerial shareholdings with agency costs. Design/methodology/approach: The data for the study is obtained from two sources, namely primary (questionnaire) and secondary (annual reports) data. The sample companies are 235 companies listed on Bursa Malaysia for the financial year ended 2006. Multiple regression analysis is used to estimate the relationship between the variables. Findings: The results of the study indicate that managerial ownership in various segments has an inverse relationship with total monitoring costs as predicted in agency theory. This finding is consistent with earlier studies in western countries and supports the convergence of interest hypothesis. Originality/value: This study gives a unique contribution to corporate governance studies relating to the effect of ownership structure in relation to agency theory in Malaysian companies, one of the countries in Asia. Previous studies claimed that it is unknown whether the agency theory findings in western countries have equal impact in Asian organizations. Previous literature also indicates that there is a possibility that given the cultural differences, the typical nature of agents in agency theory may not be the case with regard to non‐western countries. Thus, this study provides evidence that support prior research findings in western countries relating to the effect of managerial ownership on the agency relationship which is reflected in its agency costs.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T07:55:02Z
format Article
id upm.eprints-22805
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T07:55:02Z
publishDate 2011
publisher Emerald Group Publishing
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-228052015-10-16T07:52:13Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/22805/ Agency theory and managerial ownership: evidence from Malaysia Mustapha, Mazlina Che Ahmad, Ayoib Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of managerial ownership in relation to agency theory in the Malaysian business environment. In addition to examining the total managerial shareholdings, this study also investigates the association between direct and indirect managerial shareholdings with agency costs. Design/methodology/approach: The data for the study is obtained from two sources, namely primary (questionnaire) and secondary (annual reports) data. The sample companies are 235 companies listed on Bursa Malaysia for the financial year ended 2006. Multiple regression analysis is used to estimate the relationship between the variables. Findings: The results of the study indicate that managerial ownership in various segments has an inverse relationship with total monitoring costs as predicted in agency theory. This finding is consistent with earlier studies in western countries and supports the convergence of interest hypothesis. Originality/value: This study gives a unique contribution to corporate governance studies relating to the effect of ownership structure in relation to agency theory in Malaysian companies, one of the countries in Asia. Previous studies claimed that it is unknown whether the agency theory findings in western countries have equal impact in Asian organizations. Previous literature also indicates that there is a possibility that given the cultural differences, the typical nature of agents in agency theory may not be the case with regard to non‐western countries. Thus, this study provides evidence that support prior research findings in western countries relating to the effect of managerial ownership on the agency relationship which is reflected in its agency costs. Emerald Group Publishing 2011 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/22805/1/Agency%20theory%20and%20managerial%20ownership.pdf Mustapha, Mazlina and Che Ahmad, Ayoib (2011) Agency theory and managerial ownership: evidence from Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26 (5). pp. 419-436. ISSN 0268-6902; ESSN: 1758-7735 10.1108/02686901111129571
spellingShingle Mustapha, Mazlina
Che Ahmad, Ayoib
Agency theory and managerial ownership: evidence from Malaysia
title Agency theory and managerial ownership: evidence from Malaysia
title_full Agency theory and managerial ownership: evidence from Malaysia
title_fullStr Agency theory and managerial ownership: evidence from Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Agency theory and managerial ownership: evidence from Malaysia
title_short Agency theory and managerial ownership: evidence from Malaysia
title_sort agency theory and managerial ownership evidence from malaysia
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/22805/1/Agency%20theory%20and%20managerial%20ownership.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mustaphamazlina agencytheoryandmanagerialownershipevidencefrommalaysia
AT cheahmadayoib agencytheoryandmanagerialownershipevidencefrommalaysia