A study on selection of probability distributions for at-site flood frequency analysis in Australia
The most direct method of design flood estimation is at-site flood frequency analysis, which relies on a relatively long period of recorded streamflow data at a given site. Selection of an appropriate probability distribution and associated parameter estimation procedure is of prime importance in at...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Springer
2013
|
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/28659/1/A%20study%20on%20selection%20of%20probability%20distributions%20for%20at.pdf |
| _version_ | 1825947359804129280 |
|---|---|
| author | Rahman, Ayesha S. Rahman, Ataur Zaman, Mohammad A. Haddad, Khaled Ahsan, Amimul Imteaz, Monzur Alam |
| author_facet | Rahman, Ayesha S. Rahman, Ataur Zaman, Mohammad A. Haddad, Khaled Ahsan, Amimul Imteaz, Monzur Alam |
| author_sort | Rahman, Ayesha S. |
| collection | UPM |
| description | The most direct method of design flood estimation is at-site flood frequency analysis, which relies on a relatively long period of recorded streamflow data at a given site. Selection of an appropriate probability distribution and associated parameter estimation procedure is of prime importance in at-site flood frequency analysis. The choice of the probability distribution for a given application is generally made arbitrarily as there is no sound physical basis to justify the selection. In this study, an attempt is made to investigate the suitability of as many as fifteen different probability distributions and three parameter estimation methods based on a large Australian annual maximum flood data set. A total of four goodness-of-fit tests are adopted, i.e., the Akaike information criterion, the Bayesian information criterion, Anderson–Darling test, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, to identify the best-fit probability distributions. Furthermore, the L-moments ratio diagram is used to make a visual assessment of the alternative distributions. It has been found that a single distribution cannot be specified as the best-fit distribution for all the Australian states as it was recommended in the Australian rainfall and runoff 1987. The log-Pearson 3, generalized extreme value, and generalized Pareto distributions have been identified as the top three best-fit distributions. It is thus recommended that these three distributions should be compared as a minimum in practical applications when making the final selection of the best-fit probability distribution in a given application in Australia. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T08:12:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | upm.eprints-28659 |
| institution | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T08:12:10Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publisher | Springer |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | upm.eprints-286592015-10-29T08:09:14Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/28659/ A study on selection of probability distributions for at-site flood frequency analysis in Australia Rahman, Ayesha S. Rahman, Ataur Zaman, Mohammad A. Haddad, Khaled Ahsan, Amimul Imteaz, Monzur Alam The most direct method of design flood estimation is at-site flood frequency analysis, which relies on a relatively long period of recorded streamflow data at a given site. Selection of an appropriate probability distribution and associated parameter estimation procedure is of prime importance in at-site flood frequency analysis. The choice of the probability distribution for a given application is generally made arbitrarily as there is no sound physical basis to justify the selection. In this study, an attempt is made to investigate the suitability of as many as fifteen different probability distributions and three parameter estimation methods based on a large Australian annual maximum flood data set. A total of four goodness-of-fit tests are adopted, i.e., the Akaike information criterion, the Bayesian information criterion, Anderson–Darling test, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, to identify the best-fit probability distributions. Furthermore, the L-moments ratio diagram is used to make a visual assessment of the alternative distributions. It has been found that a single distribution cannot be specified as the best-fit distribution for all the Australian states as it was recommended in the Australian rainfall and runoff 1987. The log-Pearson 3, generalized extreme value, and generalized Pareto distributions have been identified as the top three best-fit distributions. It is thus recommended that these three distributions should be compared as a minimum in practical applications when making the final selection of the best-fit probability distribution in a given application in Australia. Springer 2013-12 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/28659/1/A%20study%20on%20selection%20of%20probability%20distributions%20for%20at.pdf Rahman, Ayesha S. and Rahman, Ataur and Zaman, Mohammad A. and Haddad, Khaled and Ahsan, Amimul and Imteaz, Monzur Alam (2013) A study on selection of probability distributions for at-site flood frequency analysis in Australia. Natural Hazards, 69 (3). pp. 1803-1813. ISSN 0921-030X; ESSN: 1573-0840 10.1007/s11069-013-0775-y |
| spellingShingle | Rahman, Ayesha S. Rahman, Ataur Zaman, Mohammad A. Haddad, Khaled Ahsan, Amimul Imteaz, Monzur Alam A study on selection of probability distributions for at-site flood frequency analysis in Australia |
| title | A study on selection of probability distributions for at-site flood frequency analysis in Australia |
| title_full | A study on selection of probability distributions for at-site flood frequency analysis in Australia |
| title_fullStr | A study on selection of probability distributions for at-site flood frequency analysis in Australia |
| title_full_unstemmed | A study on selection of probability distributions for at-site flood frequency analysis in Australia |
| title_short | A study on selection of probability distributions for at-site flood frequency analysis in Australia |
| title_sort | study on selection of probability distributions for at site flood frequency analysis in australia |
| url | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/28659/1/A%20study%20on%20selection%20of%20probability%20distributions%20for%20at.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rahmanayeshas astudyonselectionofprobabilitydistributionsforatsitefloodfrequencyanalysisinaustralia AT rahmanataur astudyonselectionofprobabilitydistributionsforatsitefloodfrequencyanalysisinaustralia AT zamanmohammada astudyonselectionofprobabilitydistributionsforatsitefloodfrequencyanalysisinaustralia AT haddadkhaled astudyonselectionofprobabilitydistributionsforatsitefloodfrequencyanalysisinaustralia AT ahsanamimul astudyonselectionofprobabilitydistributionsforatsitefloodfrequencyanalysisinaustralia AT imteazmonzuralam astudyonselectionofprobabilitydistributionsforatsitefloodfrequencyanalysisinaustralia AT rahmanayeshas studyonselectionofprobabilitydistributionsforatsitefloodfrequencyanalysisinaustralia AT rahmanataur studyonselectionofprobabilitydistributionsforatsitefloodfrequencyanalysisinaustralia AT zamanmohammada studyonselectionofprobabilitydistributionsforatsitefloodfrequencyanalysisinaustralia AT haddadkhaled studyonselectionofprobabilitydistributionsforatsitefloodfrequencyanalysisinaustralia AT ahsanamimul studyonselectionofprobabilitydistributionsforatsitefloodfrequencyanalysisinaustralia AT imteazmonzuralam studyonselectionofprobabilitydistributionsforatsitefloodfrequencyanalysisinaustralia |