Islam and Muslims in the New York Times: two versions, two camps

This paper discusses the coverage of Islam and Muslims in the New York Times (NYT) in the wake of the 9/11 events and the ensuing two years. The study shows that coverage of Islam and Muslims takes a new trajectory regarding their representation by which the NYT departs from a monolithic representat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alazzany, Murad Ali Obaid Abdullah, Wong, Bee Eng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press 2014
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/34279/1/Islam%20and%20Muslims%20in%20the%20New%20York%20Times%20Two%20Versions%2C.pdf
_version_ 1825948418667708416
author Alazzany, Murad Ali Obaid Abdullah
Wong, Bee Eng
author_facet Alazzany, Murad Ali Obaid Abdullah
Wong, Bee Eng
author_sort Alazzany, Murad Ali Obaid Abdullah
collection UPM
description This paper discusses the coverage of Islam and Muslims in the New York Times (NYT) in the wake of the 9/11 events and the ensuing two years. The study shows that coverage of Islam and Muslims takes a new trajectory regarding their representation by which the NYT departs from a monolithic representation towards a fragmented perception. It stays away from the previous themes that have been constantly projected about Islam and Muslims in the western media and provides a more diverse picture. As such, it showed Islam to have two versions, moderate and extremist, and portrayed Muslims based on these two versions. A myriad of diverse themes are manifested and projected in relation to the different versions and camps of Islam and Muslims. From another perspective, the NYT utilizes the essentialization strategy to affiliate extremism to all Islamic movements operating in the domain of politics. It lumps all of them together, portraying them as a threat without concern as to whether they seek political means or use violence to achieve their goals. No distinction is made among these movements in regard to whether they are traditional, modern, violent or peaceful. In adopting this strategy, it thus becomes unclear where moderate Islam ends and where extremism or fundamentalism begins. This dichotomy of Islam and Muslims camps and the essentialization of political Islam are revealed in the light of a multi-disciplinary approach of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) in which a textual analysis and a critical linguistic approach are adopted.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T08:28:31Z
format Article
id upm.eprints-34279
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T08:28:31Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-342792015-12-10T02:48:35Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/34279/ Islam and Muslims in the New York Times: two versions, two camps Alazzany, Murad Ali Obaid Abdullah Wong, Bee Eng This paper discusses the coverage of Islam and Muslims in the New York Times (NYT) in the wake of the 9/11 events and the ensuing two years. The study shows that coverage of Islam and Muslims takes a new trajectory regarding their representation by which the NYT departs from a monolithic representation towards a fragmented perception. It stays away from the previous themes that have been constantly projected about Islam and Muslims in the western media and provides a more diverse picture. As such, it showed Islam to have two versions, moderate and extremist, and portrayed Muslims based on these two versions. A myriad of diverse themes are manifested and projected in relation to the different versions and camps of Islam and Muslims. From another perspective, the NYT utilizes the essentialization strategy to affiliate extremism to all Islamic movements operating in the domain of politics. It lumps all of them together, portraying them as a threat without concern as to whether they seek political means or use violence to achieve their goals. No distinction is made among these movements in regard to whether they are traditional, modern, violent or peaceful. In adopting this strategy, it thus becomes unclear where moderate Islam ends and where extremism or fundamentalism begins. This dichotomy of Islam and Muslims camps and the essentialization of political Islam are revealed in the light of a multi-disciplinary approach of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) in which a textual analysis and a critical linguistic approach are adopted. Universiti Putra Malaysia Press 2014-02 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/34279/1/Islam%20and%20Muslims%20in%20the%20New%20York%20Times%20Two%20Versions%2C.pdf Alazzany, Murad Ali Obaid Abdullah and Wong, Bee Eng (2014) Islam and Muslims in the New York Times: two versions, two camps. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 22 (spec. Feb.). pp. 33-58. ISSN 0128-7702; ESSN: 2231-8534 http://www.pertanika.upm.edu.my/Pertanika%20PAPERS/JSSH%20Vol.%2022%20(S)%20Feb.%202014/03%20Page%2033-58%20(JSSH%201036-2013).pdf
spellingShingle Alazzany, Murad Ali Obaid Abdullah
Wong, Bee Eng
Islam and Muslims in the New York Times: two versions, two camps
title Islam and Muslims in the New York Times: two versions, two camps
title_full Islam and Muslims in the New York Times: two versions, two camps
title_fullStr Islam and Muslims in the New York Times: two versions, two camps
title_full_unstemmed Islam and Muslims in the New York Times: two versions, two camps
title_short Islam and Muslims in the New York Times: two versions, two camps
title_sort islam and muslims in the new york times two versions two camps
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/34279/1/Islam%20and%20Muslims%20in%20the%20New%20York%20Times%20Two%20Versions%2C.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alazzanymuradaliobaidabdullah islamandmuslimsinthenewyorktimestwoversionstwocamps
AT wongbeeeng islamandmuslimsinthenewyorktimestwoversionstwocamps