The efficacy of a quantitative cross cultural product design survey instrument

Background/Objectives: Designers and manufacturers often have difficulty in designing products that would be able to meet the demands and needs for various users from different cultures or nations. In an increasingly globalized world, meeting the needs and requirements for users from different cultu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Syed Mohamed, Muhammad Syafiq, Mohd Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri, Rahman, R.
Format: Article
Published: American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information 2014
_version_ 1825948697524961280
author Syed Mohamed, Muhammad Syafiq
Mohd Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri
Rahman, R.
author_facet Syed Mohamed, Muhammad Syafiq
Mohd Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri
Rahman, R.
author_sort Syed Mohamed, Muhammad Syafiq
collection UPM
description Background/Objectives: Designers and manufacturers often have difficulty in designing products that would be able to meet the demands and needs for various users from different cultures or nations. In an increasingly globalized world, meeting the needs and requirements for users from different cultural backgrounds is crucial for the safety and health of users, as well as survival of the company. In this research a cross cultural product design survey was tested for its suitability and reliability. Method/Statistical Analysis: A short review of the past cross cultural models such as Hofstede (1980), Hall (1973), Trompenaars (1997) and Lee (2001) was conducted, as well as the pilot testing of Lee’s quantitative cross cultural product design survey instrument and a pilot study involving 36 Malaysian undergraduate students were conducted. Reliability and suitability of survey instrument were tested with Cronbach’s Alpha and Kolmogrov Smirnov analysis. Results: Cronbach’s Alpha value for the overall survey instrument reliability was 0.387. Referring to the values for each scale in the survey instrument the highest Cronbach Alpha value was 0.499, and the lowest was -0.135. Kolmogorov Smirnov test showed that for almost all of the survey items responses had a non-normal data distribution. Conclusion/Application: A cross cultural product design survey needs to be reliable and valid. In this study, the proposed survey instrument showed poor reliability. Quantitative assessment method has yet to prove itself their suitability in cross cultural product design research.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T08:33:06Z
format Article
id upm.eprints-35695
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
last_indexed 2024-03-06T08:33:06Z
publishDate 2014
publisher American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-356952016-02-04T00:57:17Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/35695/ The efficacy of a quantitative cross cultural product design survey instrument Syed Mohamed, Muhammad Syafiq Mohd Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri Rahman, R. Background/Objectives: Designers and manufacturers often have difficulty in designing products that would be able to meet the demands and needs for various users from different cultures or nations. In an increasingly globalized world, meeting the needs and requirements for users from different cultural backgrounds is crucial for the safety and health of users, as well as survival of the company. In this research a cross cultural product design survey was tested for its suitability and reliability. Method/Statistical Analysis: A short review of the past cross cultural models such as Hofstede (1980), Hall (1973), Trompenaars (1997) and Lee (2001) was conducted, as well as the pilot testing of Lee’s quantitative cross cultural product design survey instrument and a pilot study involving 36 Malaysian undergraduate students were conducted. Reliability and suitability of survey instrument were tested with Cronbach’s Alpha and Kolmogrov Smirnov analysis. Results: Cronbach’s Alpha value for the overall survey instrument reliability was 0.387. Referring to the values for each scale in the survey instrument the highest Cronbach Alpha value was 0.499, and the lowest was -0.135. Kolmogorov Smirnov test showed that for almost all of the survey items responses had a non-normal data distribution. Conclusion/Application: A cross cultural product design survey needs to be reliable and valid. In this study, the proposed survey instrument showed poor reliability. Quantitative assessment method has yet to prove itself their suitability in cross cultural product design research. American-Eurasian Network for Scientific Information 2014 Article PeerReviewed Syed Mohamed, Muhammad Syafiq and Mohd Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri and Rahman, R. (2014) The efficacy of a quantitative cross cultural product design survey instrument. Advances in Environmental Biology, 8 (15). pp. 207-212. ISSN 1995-0756; ESSN: 1998-1066 http://www.aensiweb.com/old/aeb_Special8-ICEOH_2014.html
spellingShingle Syed Mohamed, Muhammad Syafiq
Mohd Tamrin, Shamsul Bahri
Rahman, R.
The efficacy of a quantitative cross cultural product design survey instrument
title The efficacy of a quantitative cross cultural product design survey instrument
title_full The efficacy of a quantitative cross cultural product design survey instrument
title_fullStr The efficacy of a quantitative cross cultural product design survey instrument
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of a quantitative cross cultural product design survey instrument
title_short The efficacy of a quantitative cross cultural product design survey instrument
title_sort efficacy of a quantitative cross cultural product design survey instrument
work_keys_str_mv AT syedmohamedmuhammadsyafiq theefficacyofaquantitativecrossculturalproductdesignsurveyinstrument
AT mohdtamrinshamsulbahri theefficacyofaquantitativecrossculturalproductdesignsurveyinstrument
AT rahmanr theefficacyofaquantitativecrossculturalproductdesignsurveyinstrument
AT syedmohamedmuhammadsyafiq efficacyofaquantitativecrossculturalproductdesignsurveyinstrument
AT mohdtamrinshamsulbahri efficacyofaquantitativecrossculturalproductdesignsurveyinstrument
AT rahmanr efficacyofaquantitativecrossculturalproductdesignsurveyinstrument