Incentive schemes and foreign investment in the industrialization of Malaysia

Post-independence, Malaysia has implemented policies to encourage private foreign investment (PFI) in the manufacturing industries through a plethora of incentive schemes (tax relief, pioneer status, investment tax credits, export incentives, locational incentives). The incentive schemes aimed to re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karunaratne, N. D., Abdullah, M. B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of California Press 1978
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/40224/1/Incentive%20schemes%20and%20foreign%20investment%20in%20the%20industrialization%20of%20Malaysia.pdf
_version_ 1796973697055064064
author Karunaratne, N. D.
Abdullah, M. B.
author_facet Karunaratne, N. D.
Abdullah, M. B.
author_sort Karunaratne, N. D.
collection UPM
description Post-independence, Malaysia has implemented policies to encourage private foreign investment (PFI) in the manufacturing industries through a plethora of incentive schemes (tax relief, pioneer status, investment tax credits, export incentives, locational incentives). The incentive schemes aimed to rectify the skewed nature of PFI which has concentrated in traditional extractive industries pre-independence, by encouraging diversification into manufacturing. However, the statistical analysis of survey results reveal that the incentive packages were ineffective and PFI was attracted to Malaysia and Singapore in order to gain a beachhead as a centre for regional distribution. Furthermore, the incentive schemes promoted capital-intensive industries and were located in developed regions with good infrastructure and financial services. Furthermore, the incentive schemes perpetuated unprofitable projects resulting in a drain on potential fiscal revenue. The study clearly reveals that whilst incentives such as free trade zones (FTZ) and tax-concessions promoted export oriented industries, overall the incentive packages were ineffective or even counterproductive. It appears that PFI is attracted more by non-incentive factors such as political stability and sound macroeconomic policies rather than tax-incentives. The need to reshape policies to attract the type of PFI that will generate employment and develop the rural hinterland needs to be addressed. In this context the prospects for regional cooperation among the ASEAN countries to counteract the 'concessions war' by harmonization of tax and incentive policies is moot.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T08:46:26Z
format Article
id upm.eprints-40224
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T08:46:26Z
publishDate 1978
publisher University of California Press
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-402242015-10-28T03:09:51Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/40224/ Incentive schemes and foreign investment in the industrialization of Malaysia Karunaratne, N. D. Abdullah, M. B. Post-independence, Malaysia has implemented policies to encourage private foreign investment (PFI) in the manufacturing industries through a plethora of incentive schemes (tax relief, pioneer status, investment tax credits, export incentives, locational incentives). The incentive schemes aimed to rectify the skewed nature of PFI which has concentrated in traditional extractive industries pre-independence, by encouraging diversification into manufacturing. However, the statistical analysis of survey results reveal that the incentive packages were ineffective and PFI was attracted to Malaysia and Singapore in order to gain a beachhead as a centre for regional distribution. Furthermore, the incentive schemes promoted capital-intensive industries and were located in developed regions with good infrastructure and financial services. Furthermore, the incentive schemes perpetuated unprofitable projects resulting in a drain on potential fiscal revenue. The study clearly reveals that whilst incentives such as free trade zones (FTZ) and tax-concessions promoted export oriented industries, overall the incentive packages were ineffective or even counterproductive. It appears that PFI is attracted more by non-incentive factors such as political stability and sound macroeconomic policies rather than tax-incentives. The need to reshape policies to attract the type of PFI that will generate employment and develop the rural hinterland needs to be addressed. In this context the prospects for regional cooperation among the ASEAN countries to counteract the 'concessions war' by harmonization of tax and incentive policies is moot. University of California Press 1978-03 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/40224/1/Incentive%20schemes%20and%20foreign%20investment%20in%20the%20industrialization%20of%20Malaysia.pdf Karunaratne, N. D. and Abdullah, M. B. (1978) Incentive schemes and foreign investment in the industrialization of Malaysia. Asian Survey, 18 (3). pp. 261-274. ISSN 0004-4687
spellingShingle Karunaratne, N. D.
Abdullah, M. B.
Incentive schemes and foreign investment in the industrialization of Malaysia
title Incentive schemes and foreign investment in the industrialization of Malaysia
title_full Incentive schemes and foreign investment in the industrialization of Malaysia
title_fullStr Incentive schemes and foreign investment in the industrialization of Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Incentive schemes and foreign investment in the industrialization of Malaysia
title_short Incentive schemes and foreign investment in the industrialization of Malaysia
title_sort incentive schemes and foreign investment in the industrialization of malaysia
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/40224/1/Incentive%20schemes%20and%20foreign%20investment%20in%20the%20industrialization%20of%20Malaysia.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT karunaratnend incentiveschemesandforeigninvestmentintheindustrializationofmalaysia
AT abdullahmb incentiveschemesandforeigninvestmentintheindustrializationofmalaysia