On comparison between logistic regression and geographically weighted logistic regression: with application to Indonesian poverty data

The linear models generally rely on the assumption of independence. This assumption is not accomplished in social sciences in which observations are usually correlated. In the case of socioeconomic data, the phenomenon of spatial dependence will lead to the problem of spatial-nonstationarity. There...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saefuddin, Asep, Setiabudi, Nur Andi, Fitrianto, Anwar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IDOSI Publications 2012
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/44211/1/On%20comparison%20between%20logistic%20regression%20and%20geographically%20weighted%20logistic%20regression%20with%20application%20to%20Indonesian%20poverty%20data.pdf
_version_ 1825929505799143424
author Saefuddin, Asep
Setiabudi, Nur Andi
Fitrianto, Anwar
author_facet Saefuddin, Asep
Setiabudi, Nur Andi
Fitrianto, Anwar
author_sort Saefuddin, Asep
collection UPM
description The linear models generally rely on the assumption of independence. This assumption is not accomplished in social sciences in which observations are usually correlated. In the case of socioeconomic data, the phenomenon of spatial dependence will lead to the problem of spatial-nonstationarity. There are many methods proposed in dealing with spatial-nonstationarity, including geographically weighted regression (GWR), to accommodate local-spatial effect on the observations. The method estimates local parameters in each location rather than single parameter in the global model. GWR can be applied to linear, logistic and Poisson regression. This paper explores properties of GWR for logistic regression, i.e. geographically weighted logistic regression. Application of the model to Indonesia poverty give a contradict results compared to the global logistic model. Statistical tools of model comparison are residuals sum of square, Pearson X², deviance, log likelihood, Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, spatial autocorrelation coefficient and power of classification accuracy. In general, the logistic GWR performed better than the global one.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T08:57:44Z
format Article
id upm.eprints-44211
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T08:57:44Z
publishDate 2012
publisher IDOSI Publications
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-442112020-07-09T07:21:15Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/44211/ On comparison between logistic regression and geographically weighted logistic regression: with application to Indonesian poverty data Saefuddin, Asep Setiabudi, Nur Andi Fitrianto, Anwar The linear models generally rely on the assumption of independence. This assumption is not accomplished in social sciences in which observations are usually correlated. In the case of socioeconomic data, the phenomenon of spatial dependence will lead to the problem of spatial-nonstationarity. There are many methods proposed in dealing with spatial-nonstationarity, including geographically weighted regression (GWR), to accommodate local-spatial effect on the observations. The method estimates local parameters in each location rather than single parameter in the global model. GWR can be applied to linear, logistic and Poisson regression. This paper explores properties of GWR for logistic regression, i.e. geographically weighted logistic regression. Application of the model to Indonesia poverty give a contradict results compared to the global logistic model. Statistical tools of model comparison are residuals sum of square, Pearson X², deviance, log likelihood, Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, spatial autocorrelation coefficient and power of classification accuracy. In general, the logistic GWR performed better than the global one. IDOSI Publications 2012 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/44211/1/On%20comparison%20between%20logistic%20regression%20and%20geographically%20weighted%20logistic%20regression%20with%20application%20to%20Indonesian%20poverty%20data.pdf Saefuddin, Asep and Setiabudi, Nur Andi and Fitrianto, Anwar (2012) On comparison between logistic regression and geographically weighted logistic regression: with application to Indonesian poverty data. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19 (2). pp. 205-210. ISSN 1818-4952; ESSN: 1991-6426 https://www.idosi.org/wasj/wasj19(2)2012.htm 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.19.02.528
spellingShingle Saefuddin, Asep
Setiabudi, Nur Andi
Fitrianto, Anwar
On comparison between logistic regression and geographically weighted logistic regression: with application to Indonesian poverty data
title On comparison between logistic regression and geographically weighted logistic regression: with application to Indonesian poverty data
title_full On comparison between logistic regression and geographically weighted logistic regression: with application to Indonesian poverty data
title_fullStr On comparison between logistic regression and geographically weighted logistic regression: with application to Indonesian poverty data
title_full_unstemmed On comparison between logistic regression and geographically weighted logistic regression: with application to Indonesian poverty data
title_short On comparison between logistic regression and geographically weighted logistic regression: with application to Indonesian poverty data
title_sort on comparison between logistic regression and geographically weighted logistic regression with application to indonesian poverty data
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/44211/1/On%20comparison%20between%20logistic%20regression%20and%20geographically%20weighted%20logistic%20regression%20with%20application%20to%20Indonesian%20poverty%20data.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT saefuddinasep oncomparisonbetweenlogisticregressionandgeographicallyweightedlogisticregressionwithapplicationtoindonesianpovertydata
AT setiabudinurandi oncomparisonbetweenlogisticregressionandgeographicallyweightedlogisticregressionwithapplicationtoindonesianpovertydata
AT fitriantoanwar oncomparisonbetweenlogisticregressionandgeographicallyweightedlogisticregressionwithapplicationtoindonesianpovertydata