Comparative study between programming systems for incremental sheet forming process
Incremental Sheet Forming (ISF) is a method developed to form a desired surface feature on sheet metals in batch production series. Due to a lack of dedicated programming system to execute, control and monitor the whole ISF, researchers tried to utilize programming systems designed for chip making p...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
EDP Sciences
2014
|
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/50091/1/matecconf_icper2014_04009.pdf |
| _version_ | 1796975261500047360 |
|---|---|
| author | Moayedfar, Majid Abdul Rani, Ahmad Majdi Salehi, Pouria Tad, Varaha Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Rao |
| author_facet | Moayedfar, Majid Abdul Rani, Ahmad Majdi Salehi, Pouria Tad, Varaha Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Rao |
| author_sort | Moayedfar, Majid |
| collection | UPM |
| description | Incremental Sheet Forming (ISF) is a method developed to form a desired surface feature on sheet metals in batch production series. Due to a lack of dedicated programming system to execute, control and monitor the whole ISF, researchers tried to utilize programming systems designed for chip making process to suits for ISF. In this work, experiments were conducted to find suitability and quality of ISF parts produced by using manual CNC part programming. Therefore, ISF was carried out on stainless steel sheets using Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling machines. Prior to running the experiments, a ball-point shaped tool made of bronze alloy was fabricated due to its superior ability to reduce the amount of friction and improve the surface quality of the stainless steel sheet metal. The experiments also employed the method of forming in negative direction with a blank mould and the tool which helped to shape the desired part quickly. The programming was generated using the MasterCAM software for the CNC milling machine and edited before transferring to the machine. However, the programming for the machine was written manually to show the differences of output date between software programming and manual programming. From the results, best method of programming was found and minimum amount of contact area between tool and sheet metal achieved. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T09:08:57Z |
| format | Conference or Workshop Item |
| id | upm.eprints-50091 |
| institution | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T09:08:57Z |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publisher | EDP Sciences |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | upm.eprints-500912017-02-01T04:42:09Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/50091/ Comparative study between programming systems for incremental sheet forming process Moayedfar, Majid Abdul Rani, Ahmad Majdi Salehi, Pouria Tad, Varaha Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Rao Incremental Sheet Forming (ISF) is a method developed to form a desired surface feature on sheet metals in batch production series. Due to a lack of dedicated programming system to execute, control and monitor the whole ISF, researchers tried to utilize programming systems designed for chip making process to suits for ISF. In this work, experiments were conducted to find suitability and quality of ISF parts produced by using manual CNC part programming. Therefore, ISF was carried out on stainless steel sheets using Computer Numerical Control (CNC) milling machines. Prior to running the experiments, a ball-point shaped tool made of bronze alloy was fabricated due to its superior ability to reduce the amount of friction and improve the surface quality of the stainless steel sheet metal. The experiments also employed the method of forming in negative direction with a blank mould and the tool which helped to shape the desired part quickly. The programming was generated using the MasterCAM software for the CNC milling machine and edited before transferring to the machine. However, the programming for the machine was written manually to show the differences of output date between software programming and manual programming. From the results, best method of programming was found and minimum amount of contact area between tool and sheet metal achieved. EDP Sciences 2014 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/50091/1/matecconf_icper2014_04009.pdf Moayedfar, Majid and Abdul Rani, Ahmad Majdi and Salehi, Pouria and Tad, Varaha Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Rao (2014) Comparative study between programming systems for incremental sheet forming process. In: 4th International Conference on Production, Energy and Reliability (ICPER 2014), 3-5 June 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. (pp. 1-5). http://www.matec-conferences.org/articles/matecconf/abs/2014/04/matecconf_icper2014_04009/matecconf_icper2014_04009.html 10.1051/matecconf/20141304009 |
| spellingShingle | Moayedfar, Majid Abdul Rani, Ahmad Majdi Salehi, Pouria Tad, Varaha Venkata Lakshmi Narasimha Rao Comparative study between programming systems for incremental sheet forming process |
| title | Comparative study between programming systems for incremental sheet forming process |
| title_full | Comparative study between programming systems for incremental sheet forming process |
| title_fullStr | Comparative study between programming systems for incremental sheet forming process |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative study between programming systems for incremental sheet forming process |
| title_short | Comparative study between programming systems for incremental sheet forming process |
| title_sort | comparative study between programming systems for incremental sheet forming process |
| url | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/50091/1/matecconf_icper2014_04009.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT moayedfarmajid comparativestudybetweenprogrammingsystemsforincrementalsheetformingprocess AT abdulraniahmadmajdi comparativestudybetweenprogrammingsystemsforincrementalsheetformingprocess AT salehipouria comparativestudybetweenprogrammingsystemsforincrementalsheetformingprocess AT tadvarahavenkatalakshminarasimharao comparativestudybetweenprogrammingsystemsforincrementalsheetformingprocess |