Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines

Formulaic sequences play a crucial role in building academic discourse. From among the variety of formulaic expressions, lexical bundles have been shown to serve particular facilitative functions in academic discourse. Defined as strings of word forms that commonly co-occur in natural discourse, lex...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রধান লেখক: Kashiha, Hadi, Chan, Swee Heng
বিন্যাস: প্রবন্ধ
ভাষা:English
প্রকাশিত: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2014
অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/57110/1/Discourse%20functions%20of%20formulaic%20sequences%20in%20academic%20speech%20across%20two%20disciplines.pdf
_version_ 1825931547160608768
author Kashiha, Hadi
Chan, Swee Heng
author_facet Kashiha, Hadi
Chan, Swee Heng
author_sort Kashiha, Hadi
collection UPM
description Formulaic sequences play a crucial role in building academic discourse. From among the variety of formulaic expressions, lexical bundles have been shown to serve particular facilitative functions in academic discourse. Defined as strings of word forms that commonly co-occur in natural discourse, lexical bundles are characterized statistically by their frequency of occurrence and they contribute significantly to fluency in speech and writing. While previous research had focused on the use of these expressions in academic research articles across disciplines or on the difference between spoken and written registers, little research has been carried out to find out the language use of academic lectures from different disciplines in terms of the use of these bundles, orally. Taking into account this consideration, the present study aimed to investigate how lexical bundles are used by academic lecturers from different disciplinary communities. With the aim of comparing their language selection, the most frequent four-word lexical bundles in academic lectures of two disciplines, namely politics and chemistry were identified and categorized. The procedure adopts Biber et al.’s (2004) functional categorization of lexical bundles to investigate the communicative purposes that lexical bundles convey in the lectures of the two groups and to see whether there were any disciplinary differences with regard to the bundles used. Based on the findings, there were some marked variations found across the two disciplines in terms of discourse functions of the lexical bundles. It seemed that academic lectures rely heavily on the use of specific word combinations to fulfill those functions related to their discipline.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T09:28:24Z
format Article
id upm.eprints-57110
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T09:28:24Z
publishDate 2014
publisher Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-571102017-09-07T04:58:05Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/57110/ Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines Kashiha, Hadi Chan, Swee Heng Formulaic sequences play a crucial role in building academic discourse. From among the variety of formulaic expressions, lexical bundles have been shown to serve particular facilitative functions in academic discourse. Defined as strings of word forms that commonly co-occur in natural discourse, lexical bundles are characterized statistically by their frequency of occurrence and they contribute significantly to fluency in speech and writing. While previous research had focused on the use of these expressions in academic research articles across disciplines or on the difference between spoken and written registers, little research has been carried out to find out the language use of academic lectures from different disciplines in terms of the use of these bundles, orally. Taking into account this consideration, the present study aimed to investigate how lexical bundles are used by academic lecturers from different disciplinary communities. With the aim of comparing their language selection, the most frequent four-word lexical bundles in academic lectures of two disciplines, namely politics and chemistry were identified and categorized. The procedure adopts Biber et al.’s (2004) functional categorization of lexical bundles to investigate the communicative purposes that lexical bundles convey in the lectures of the two groups and to see whether there were any disciplinary differences with regard to the bundles used. Based on the findings, there were some marked variations found across the two disciplines in terms of discourse functions of the lexical bundles. It seemed that academic lectures rely heavily on the use of specific word combinations to fulfill those functions related to their discipline. Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 2014 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/57110/1/Discourse%20functions%20of%20formulaic%20sequences%20in%20academic%20speech%20across%20two%20disciplines.pdf Kashiha, Hadi and Chan, Swee Heng (2014) Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 14 (2). pp. 15-27. ISSN 1675-8021; ESSN: 2550-2131 http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/article/view/4555
spellingShingle Kashiha, Hadi
Chan, Swee Heng
Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
title Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
title_full Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
title_fullStr Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
title_full_unstemmed Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
title_short Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
title_sort discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic speech across two disciplines
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/57110/1/Discourse%20functions%20of%20formulaic%20sequences%20in%20academic%20speech%20across%20two%20disciplines.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kashihahadi discoursefunctionsofformulaicsequencesinacademicspeechacrosstwodisciplines
AT chansweeheng discoursefunctionsofformulaicsequencesinacademicspeechacrosstwodisciplines