Statistical optimization of the phytoremediation of arsenic by ludwigia octovalvis in a pilot reed bed using response surface methodology (RSM) versus an artificial neural network (ANN)

In this study, the removal of arsenic (As) by plant, Ludwigia octovalvis, in a pilot reed bed was optimized. A Box-Behnken design was employed including a comparative analysis of both Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for the prediction of maximum arsenic remo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Titah, Harmin Sulistiyaning, Halmi, Mohd Izuan Effendi, Sheikh Abdullah, Siti Rozaimah, Abu Hasan, Hassimi, Idris, Mushrifah, Anuar, Nurina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis 2018
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/73966/1/Statistical%20optimization%20of%20the%20phytoremediation%20of%20arsenic%20by%20ludwigia%20octovalvis%20in%20a%20pilot%20reed%20bed%20using%20response%20surface%20methodology%20%28RSM%29%20versus%20an%20artificial%20neural%20network%20%28ANN%29.pdf
_version_ 1825950279384694784
author Titah, Harmin Sulistiyaning
Halmi, Mohd Izuan Effendi
Sheikh Abdullah, Siti Rozaimah
Abu Hasan, Hassimi
Idris, Mushrifah
Anuar, Nurina
author_facet Titah, Harmin Sulistiyaning
Halmi, Mohd Izuan Effendi
Sheikh Abdullah, Siti Rozaimah
Abu Hasan, Hassimi
Idris, Mushrifah
Anuar, Nurina
author_sort Titah, Harmin Sulistiyaning
collection UPM
description In this study, the removal of arsenic (As) by plant, Ludwigia octovalvis, in a pilot reed bed was optimized. A Box-Behnken design was employed including a comparative analysis of both Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for the prediction of maximum arsenic removal. The predicted optimum condition using the desirability function of both models was 39 mg kg-1 for the arsenic concentration in soil, an elapsed time of 42 days (the sampling day) and an aeration rate of 0.22 L/min, with the predicted values of arsenic removal by RSM and ANN being 72.6% and 71.4%, respectively. The validation of the predicted optimum point showed an actual arsenic removal of 70.6%. This was achieved with the deviation between the validation value and the predicted values being within 3.49% (RSM) and 1.87% (ANN). The performance evaluation of the RSM and ANN models showed that ANN performs better than RSM with a higher R2 (0.97) close to 1.0 and very small Average Absolute Deviation (AAD) (0.02) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) (0.004) values close to zero. Both models were appropriate for the optimization of arsenic removal with ANN demonstrating significantly higher predictive and fitting ability than RSM.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T10:12:13Z
format Article
id upm.eprints-73966
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T10:12:13Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-739662020-05-15T18:39:10Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/73966/ Statistical optimization of the phytoremediation of arsenic by ludwigia octovalvis in a pilot reed bed using response surface methodology (RSM) versus an artificial neural network (ANN) Titah, Harmin Sulistiyaning Halmi, Mohd Izuan Effendi Sheikh Abdullah, Siti Rozaimah Abu Hasan, Hassimi Idris, Mushrifah Anuar, Nurina In this study, the removal of arsenic (As) by plant, Ludwigia octovalvis, in a pilot reed bed was optimized. A Box-Behnken design was employed including a comparative analysis of both Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for the prediction of maximum arsenic removal. The predicted optimum condition using the desirability function of both models was 39 mg kg-1 for the arsenic concentration in soil, an elapsed time of 42 days (the sampling day) and an aeration rate of 0.22 L/min, with the predicted values of arsenic removal by RSM and ANN being 72.6% and 71.4%, respectively. The validation of the predicted optimum point showed an actual arsenic removal of 70.6%. This was achieved with the deviation between the validation value and the predicted values being within 3.49% (RSM) and 1.87% (ANN). The performance evaluation of the RSM and ANN models showed that ANN performs better than RSM with a higher R2 (0.97) close to 1.0 and very small Average Absolute Deviation (AAD) (0.02) and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) (0.004) values close to zero. Both models were appropriate for the optimization of arsenic removal with ANN demonstrating significantly higher predictive and fitting ability than RSM. Taylor & Francis 2018 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/73966/1/Statistical%20optimization%20of%20the%20phytoremediation%20of%20arsenic%20by%20ludwigia%20octovalvis%20in%20a%20pilot%20reed%20bed%20using%20response%20surface%20methodology%20%28RSM%29%20versus%20an%20artificial%20neural%20network%20%28ANN%29.pdf Titah, Harmin Sulistiyaning and Halmi, Mohd Izuan Effendi and Sheikh Abdullah, Siti Rozaimah and Abu Hasan, Hassimi and Idris, Mushrifah and Anuar, Nurina (2018) Statistical optimization of the phytoremediation of arsenic by ludwigia octovalvis in a pilot reed bed using response surface methodology (RSM) versus an artificial neural network (ANN). International Journal of Phytoremediation, 20 (7). 721 - 729. ISSN 1522-6514; ESSN: 1549-7879 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29723047 10.1080/15226514.2017.1413337
spellingShingle Titah, Harmin Sulistiyaning
Halmi, Mohd Izuan Effendi
Sheikh Abdullah, Siti Rozaimah
Abu Hasan, Hassimi
Idris, Mushrifah
Anuar, Nurina
Statistical optimization of the phytoremediation of arsenic by ludwigia octovalvis in a pilot reed bed using response surface methodology (RSM) versus an artificial neural network (ANN)
title Statistical optimization of the phytoremediation of arsenic by ludwigia octovalvis in a pilot reed bed using response surface methodology (RSM) versus an artificial neural network (ANN)
title_full Statistical optimization of the phytoremediation of arsenic by ludwigia octovalvis in a pilot reed bed using response surface methodology (RSM) versus an artificial neural network (ANN)
title_fullStr Statistical optimization of the phytoremediation of arsenic by ludwigia octovalvis in a pilot reed bed using response surface methodology (RSM) versus an artificial neural network (ANN)
title_full_unstemmed Statistical optimization of the phytoremediation of arsenic by ludwigia octovalvis in a pilot reed bed using response surface methodology (RSM) versus an artificial neural network (ANN)
title_short Statistical optimization of the phytoremediation of arsenic by ludwigia octovalvis in a pilot reed bed using response surface methodology (RSM) versus an artificial neural network (ANN)
title_sort statistical optimization of the phytoremediation of arsenic by ludwigia octovalvis in a pilot reed bed using response surface methodology rsm versus an artificial neural network ann
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/73966/1/Statistical%20optimization%20of%20the%20phytoremediation%20of%20arsenic%20by%20ludwigia%20octovalvis%20in%20a%20pilot%20reed%20bed%20using%20response%20surface%20methodology%20%28RSM%29%20versus%20an%20artificial%20neural%20network%20%28ANN%29.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT titahharminsulistiyaning statisticaloptimizationofthephytoremediationofarsenicbyludwigiaoctovalvisinapilotreedbedusingresponsesurfacemethodologyrsmversusanartificialneuralnetworkann
AT halmimohdizuaneffendi statisticaloptimizationofthephytoremediationofarsenicbyludwigiaoctovalvisinapilotreedbedusingresponsesurfacemethodologyrsmversusanartificialneuralnetworkann
AT sheikhabdullahsitirozaimah statisticaloptimizationofthephytoremediationofarsenicbyludwigiaoctovalvisinapilotreedbedusingresponsesurfacemethodologyrsmversusanartificialneuralnetworkann
AT abuhasanhassimi statisticaloptimizationofthephytoremediationofarsenicbyludwigiaoctovalvisinapilotreedbedusingresponsesurfacemethodologyrsmversusanartificialneuralnetworkann
AT idrismushrifah statisticaloptimizationofthephytoremediationofarsenicbyludwigiaoctovalvisinapilotreedbedusingresponsesurfacemethodologyrsmversusanartificialneuralnetworkann
AT anuarnurina statisticaloptimizationofthephytoremediationofarsenicbyludwigiaoctovalvisinapilotreedbedusingresponsesurfacemethodologyrsmversusanartificialneuralnetworkann