Performance investigation and analysis of routing protocols in MANET

Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is a significant and confirms research area. The routing protocol should distinguish and keep an exceptional route among source and target. There are several assailants that able to create problems in the network, for example, a flooding assailant that causes a sag in s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Al-Hiti, Ahmed Shakir, Sahbudin, R.K.Z., Hashim, Fazirulhisyam, Zulkiflee, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medwell Journals 2018
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/75265/1/Performance30.pdf
_version_ 1825950434859155456
author Al-Hiti, Ahmed Shakir
Sahbudin, R.K.Z.
Hashim, Fazirulhisyam
Zulkiflee, M.
author_facet Al-Hiti, Ahmed Shakir
Sahbudin, R.K.Z.
Hashim, Fazirulhisyam
Zulkiflee, M.
author_sort Al-Hiti, Ahmed Shakir
collection UPM
description Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is a significant and confirms research area. The routing protocol should distinguish and keep an exceptional route among source and target. There are several assailants that able to create problems in the network, for example, a flooding assailant that causes a sag in several packages. In this study, it creates an investigation and analysis of lateness, normalized routing loads and packet delivery fractions of MANET, 2 routing protocols using Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and User Datagram Protocol (UDP), under normal conditions and under dropping packet cases. This comparison is important when choosing the better transfer package from the source to the target and the traffic kind in the network by routing protocol. The results show that AOMDV is better than AODV using TCP and UDP. In a normal condition, the delay of packets in AOMDV reaches its maximum at 0.1967, 0.3116 and 0.2832 with TCP and at 0.045, 0.0386 and 0.094 with UDP in the first, second and third scenarios, respectively. In dropping packets condition, the delay of packets in AOMDV reaches its maximum at 0.0162, 0.0587 and 0.0224 with TCP and at 0.0151, 0.0201 and 0.014 with UDP in the 1st-3rd scenarios, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T10:14:33Z
format Article
id upm.eprints-75265
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T10:14:33Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Medwell Journals
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-752652019-10-14T03:10:44Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/75265/ Performance investigation and analysis of routing protocols in MANET Al-Hiti, Ahmed Shakir Sahbudin, R.K.Z. Hashim, Fazirulhisyam Zulkiflee, M. Mobile Ad-hoc Network (MANET) is a significant and confirms research area. The routing protocol should distinguish and keep an exceptional route among source and target. There are several assailants that able to create problems in the network, for example, a flooding assailant that causes a sag in several packages. In this study, it creates an investigation and analysis of lateness, normalized routing loads and packet delivery fractions of MANET, 2 routing protocols using Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) and User Datagram Protocol (UDP), under normal conditions and under dropping packet cases. This comparison is important when choosing the better transfer package from the source to the target and the traffic kind in the network by routing protocol. The results show that AOMDV is better than AODV using TCP and UDP. In a normal condition, the delay of packets in AOMDV reaches its maximum at 0.1967, 0.3116 and 0.2832 with TCP and at 0.045, 0.0386 and 0.094 with UDP in the first, second and third scenarios, respectively. In dropping packets condition, the delay of packets in AOMDV reaches its maximum at 0.0162, 0.0587 and 0.0224 with TCP and at 0.0151, 0.0201 and 0.014 with UDP in the 1st-3rd scenarios, respectively. Medwell Journals 2018 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/75265/1/Performance30.pdf Al-Hiti, Ahmed Shakir and Sahbudin, R.K.Z. and Hashim, Fazirulhisyam and Zulkiflee, M. (2018) Performance investigation and analysis of routing protocols in MANET. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 13 (21). 9038 - 9048. ISSN 1816-949X; ESSN: 1818-7803 http://medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=jeasci.2018.9038.9048 10.3923/jeasci.2018.9038.9048
spellingShingle Al-Hiti, Ahmed Shakir
Sahbudin, R.K.Z.
Hashim, Fazirulhisyam
Zulkiflee, M.
Performance investigation and analysis of routing protocols in MANET
title Performance investigation and analysis of routing protocols in MANET
title_full Performance investigation and analysis of routing protocols in MANET
title_fullStr Performance investigation and analysis of routing protocols in MANET
title_full_unstemmed Performance investigation and analysis of routing protocols in MANET
title_short Performance investigation and analysis of routing protocols in MANET
title_sort performance investigation and analysis of routing protocols in manet
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/75265/1/Performance30.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alhitiahmedshakir performanceinvestigationandanalysisofroutingprotocolsinmanet
AT sahbudinrkz performanceinvestigationandanalysisofroutingprotocolsinmanet
AT hashimfazirulhisyam performanceinvestigationandanalysisofroutingprotocolsinmanet
AT zulkifleem performanceinvestigationandanalysisofroutingprotocolsinmanet