Key components of working capital management: investment performance in Malaysia
This study attempts to examine the role of working capital management components on four commons which are distinctive dimensions of business investment performance in Malaysia. The analysis covers 431 listed companies for the period 2000-2017 post the Asian financial crisis. The four performance in...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Growing Science
2019
|
Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/81167/1/CAPITAL.pdf |
_version_ | 1825951396940218368 |
---|---|
author | Loo, Pui Yan Lau, Wei Theng |
author_facet | Loo, Pui Yan Lau, Wei Theng |
author_sort | Loo, Pui Yan |
collection | UPM |
description | This study attempts to examine the role of working capital management components on four commons which are distinctive dimensions of business investment performance in Malaysia. The analysis covers 431 listed companies for the period 2000-2017 post the Asian financial crisis. The four performance indicators are return on assets (to proxy book return on overall business assets), return on equity (to proxy book return on shareholders’ fund), Tobin’s Q (to proxy firm valuation) and stock performance (to proxy real shareholder wealth). Our results indicate that working capital components of receivables collection period, inventory conversion period, payables deferral period, overall cash conversion cycle, current ratio, quick ratio, and cash ratio have generally exhibited important relationships with investment performance before and after the 2007-2008 subprime crisis. We would like to highlight the very robust negative effect of receivables collection period and cash conversion cycle. In addition, it is worth noting the distinctive roles of cash conversion cycle components and working capital liquidity ratios. While overly high liquidity position is usually viewed as inefficiency and detrimental for profitability, our panel data analysis consistently show that a high liquid position is favourable if the impact of cash conversion cycle is well considered. Hence, it is crucial for managers to prioritize the importance of working capital requirements to enhance the value of investors. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-06T10:29:24Z |
format | Article |
id | upm.eprints-81167 |
institution | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-06T10:29:24Z |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Growing Science |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | upm.eprints-811672021-06-19T16:40:51Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/81167/ Key components of working capital management: investment performance in Malaysia Loo, Pui Yan Lau, Wei Theng This study attempts to examine the role of working capital management components on four commons which are distinctive dimensions of business investment performance in Malaysia. The analysis covers 431 listed companies for the period 2000-2017 post the Asian financial crisis. The four performance indicators are return on assets (to proxy book return on overall business assets), return on equity (to proxy book return on shareholders’ fund), Tobin’s Q (to proxy firm valuation) and stock performance (to proxy real shareholder wealth). Our results indicate that working capital components of receivables collection period, inventory conversion period, payables deferral period, overall cash conversion cycle, current ratio, quick ratio, and cash ratio have generally exhibited important relationships with investment performance before and after the 2007-2008 subprime crisis. We would like to highlight the very robust negative effect of receivables collection period and cash conversion cycle. In addition, it is worth noting the distinctive roles of cash conversion cycle components and working capital liquidity ratios. While overly high liquidity position is usually viewed as inefficiency and detrimental for profitability, our panel data analysis consistently show that a high liquid position is favourable if the impact of cash conversion cycle is well considered. Hence, it is crucial for managers to prioritize the importance of working capital requirements to enhance the value of investors. Growing Science 2019 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/81167/1/CAPITAL.pdf Loo, Pui Yan and Lau, Wei Theng (2019) Key components of working capital management: investment performance in Malaysia. Management Science Letters, 9 (12). pp. 1995-1964. ISSN 1923-9335; ESSN: 1923-9343 http://growingscience.com/beta/msl/3314-key-components-of-working-capital-management-investment-performance-in-malaysia.html 10.5267/j.msl.2019.7.010 |
spellingShingle | Loo, Pui Yan Lau, Wei Theng Key components of working capital management: investment performance in Malaysia |
title | Key components of working capital management: investment performance in Malaysia |
title_full | Key components of working capital management: investment performance in Malaysia |
title_fullStr | Key components of working capital management: investment performance in Malaysia |
title_full_unstemmed | Key components of working capital management: investment performance in Malaysia |
title_short | Key components of working capital management: investment performance in Malaysia |
title_sort | key components of working capital management investment performance in malaysia |
url | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/81167/1/CAPITAL.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT loopuiyan keycomponentsofworkingcapitalmanagementinvestmentperformanceinmalaysia AT lauweitheng keycomponentsofworkingcapitalmanagementinvestmentperformanceinmalaysia |