A retrospective study of oral fractures in cats and dogs presented to Universiti Veterinary Hospital (UVH) from 2010 to 2013

The medical records and radiograph for dogs and cats that had been diagnosed with oral fractures at Universiti of Veterinary Hospital, Universiti Putra Malaysia between 2010 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. 137 of oral fractures cases in 88 cats and four dogs were identified in this study. Pat...

全面介绍

书目详细资料
主要作者: Teh, Ai Ling
格式: Project Paper Report
语言:English
出版: 2015
在线阅读:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/83389/1/FPV%202015%209%20-%20IR.pdf
_version_ 1825951727477587968
author Teh, Ai Ling
author_facet Teh, Ai Ling
author_sort Teh, Ai Ling
collection UPM
description The medical records and radiograph for dogs and cats that had been diagnosed with oral fractures at Universiti of Veterinary Hospital, Universiti Putra Malaysia between 2010 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. 137 of oral fractures cases in 88 cats and four dogs were identified in this study. Patient signalment, clinical signs, types of trauma, locations of fracture, types of fractures, treatment options and complication were noted. The most common locations of oral fracture in both cats (24%) and dogs (50%) were mandibular fractures. A complete and transverse mandibular fracture was the most common fractures type in cats (65%). But in dogs 50% was complete and oblique mandibular fracture. Majority of the cases were brought in due to road traffic accident cats (59%) and in dogs (50%). Most of cases presented with single location fractures (72%). The most common multiple fractures were temporomandibular junction luxation and mandibular fractures (two locations), and mandibular symphysis separation, temporomandibular joint luxation and zygomatic arch fractures (three different locations). Majority of cats (46%) were surgically stabilized compare to dogs (50%) which were stabilized with conventional treatment. The most common surgical approach was cerclage wire repair (62%) in both cats and dogs. Most of cases stabilized surgically has malocclusion (42%). Majority cases stabilized surgically were responded well (50%). However, there were cases stabilized surgically (79%) but died either before the surgery due to severe trauma or after the surgery due to other complication.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T10:34:19Z
format Project Paper Report
id upm.eprints-83389
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T10:34:19Z
publishDate 2015
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-833892020-09-15T08:06:52Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/83389/ A retrospective study of oral fractures in cats and dogs presented to Universiti Veterinary Hospital (UVH) from 2010 to 2013 Teh, Ai Ling The medical records and radiograph for dogs and cats that had been diagnosed with oral fractures at Universiti of Veterinary Hospital, Universiti Putra Malaysia between 2010 to 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. 137 of oral fractures cases in 88 cats and four dogs were identified in this study. Patient signalment, clinical signs, types of trauma, locations of fracture, types of fractures, treatment options and complication were noted. The most common locations of oral fracture in both cats (24%) and dogs (50%) were mandibular fractures. A complete and transverse mandibular fracture was the most common fractures type in cats (65%). But in dogs 50% was complete and oblique mandibular fracture. Majority of the cases were brought in due to road traffic accident cats (59%) and in dogs (50%). Most of cases presented with single location fractures (72%). The most common multiple fractures were temporomandibular junction luxation and mandibular fractures (two locations), and mandibular symphysis separation, temporomandibular joint luxation and zygomatic arch fractures (three different locations). Majority of cats (46%) were surgically stabilized compare to dogs (50%) which were stabilized with conventional treatment. The most common surgical approach was cerclage wire repair (62%) in both cats and dogs. Most of cases stabilized surgically has malocclusion (42%). Majority cases stabilized surgically were responded well (50%). However, there were cases stabilized surgically (79%) but died either before the surgery due to severe trauma or after the surgery due to other complication. 2015-03 Project Paper Report NonPeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/83389/1/FPV%202015%209%20-%20IR.pdf Teh, Ai Ling (2015) A retrospective study of oral fractures in cats and dogs presented to Universiti Veterinary Hospital (UVH) from 2010 to 2013. [Project Paper Report]
spellingShingle Teh, Ai Ling
A retrospective study of oral fractures in cats and dogs presented to Universiti Veterinary Hospital (UVH) from 2010 to 2013
title A retrospective study of oral fractures in cats and dogs presented to Universiti Veterinary Hospital (UVH) from 2010 to 2013
title_full A retrospective study of oral fractures in cats and dogs presented to Universiti Veterinary Hospital (UVH) from 2010 to 2013
title_fullStr A retrospective study of oral fractures in cats and dogs presented to Universiti Veterinary Hospital (UVH) from 2010 to 2013
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective study of oral fractures in cats and dogs presented to Universiti Veterinary Hospital (UVH) from 2010 to 2013
title_short A retrospective study of oral fractures in cats and dogs presented to Universiti Veterinary Hospital (UVH) from 2010 to 2013
title_sort retrospective study of oral fractures in cats and dogs presented to universiti veterinary hospital uvh from 2010 to 2013
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/83389/1/FPV%202015%209%20-%20IR.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tehailing aretrospectivestudyoforalfracturesincatsanddogspresentedtouniversitiveterinaryhospitaluvhfrom2010to2013
AT tehailing retrospectivestudyoforalfracturesincatsanddogspresentedtouniversitiveterinaryhospitaluvhfrom2010to2013