On knowing, accounting and the methodological position of Geertz

As a consequence of calls to view accounting as a culturally defined discipline Geertz’s work has yielded significant debate among accounting scholars. This review paper argues that Geertz á la interpretive anthropology has been inaccurately characterised by many accounting methodologists. They over...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mustafa, Hasri, Gaffikin, Michael
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
English
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/9232/1/ID%209232.pdf
_version_ 1796967690323099648
author Mustafa, Hasri
Gaffikin, Michael
author_facet Mustafa, Hasri
Gaffikin, Michael
author_sort Mustafa, Hasri
collection UPM
description As a consequence of calls to view accounting as a culturally defined discipline Geertz’s work has yielded significant debate among accounting scholars. This review paper argues that Geertz á la interpretive anthropology has been inaccurately characterised by many accounting methodologists. They overlook the theoretical anchoring of Geertzian conceptions of culture schemes - “by isolating its elements”, “internal relationships”, and “in some general way” - that illustrate accounting as a kind of being of knowing – the form of what accounting comes to. This paper traces the implications of this on fundamental consequences for accounting research methodology and establishes a direction to critique from a position from where the claims of Geertz should apparently be held.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T07:17:35Z
format Conference or Workshop Item
id upm.eprints-9232
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
language English
English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T07:17:35Z
publishDate 2010
record_format dspace
spelling upm.eprints-92322013-11-08T07:26:07Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/9232/ On knowing, accounting and the methodological position of Geertz Mustafa, Hasri Gaffikin, Michael As a consequence of calls to view accounting as a culturally defined discipline Geertz’s work has yielded significant debate among accounting scholars. This review paper argues that Geertz á la interpretive anthropology has been inaccurately characterised by many accounting methodologists. They overlook the theoretical anchoring of Geertzian conceptions of culture schemes - “by isolating its elements”, “internal relationships”, and “in some general way” - that illustrate accounting as a kind of being of knowing – the form of what accounting comes to. This paper traces the implications of this on fundamental consequences for accounting research methodology and establishes a direction to critique from a position from where the claims of Geertz should apparently be held. 2010 Conference or Workshop Item NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/9232/1/ID%209232.pdf Mustafa, Hasri and Gaffikin, Michael (2010) On knowing, accounting and the methodological position of Geertz. In: The Sixth Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting, 12-13 July 2010, University of Sydney, Australia. . (Unpublished) Accounting Accounting - Research - Methodology English
spellingShingle Accounting
Accounting - Research - Methodology
Mustafa, Hasri
Gaffikin, Michael
On knowing, accounting and the methodological position of Geertz
title On knowing, accounting and the methodological position of Geertz
title_full On knowing, accounting and the methodological position of Geertz
title_fullStr On knowing, accounting and the methodological position of Geertz
title_full_unstemmed On knowing, accounting and the methodological position of Geertz
title_short On knowing, accounting and the methodological position of Geertz
title_sort on knowing accounting and the methodological position of geertz
topic Accounting
Accounting - Research - Methodology
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/9232/1/ID%209232.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mustafahasri onknowingaccountingandthemethodologicalpositionofgeertz
AT gaffikinmichael onknowingaccountingandthemethodologicalpositionofgeertz